John Cassian, The Conferences
Conference XXI. Abbot Theonas: of the relaxation during the fifty days
Conlatio abbatis Theonae prima. De remissione Quinquagensimae.XXI. The First Conference of Abbot Theonas. On the Relaxation during the Fifty Days.
I. Quomodo Theonas ad abbatem Iohannem uenerit.
Priusquam uerba conlationis huiusce habitae cum summo uiro abbate Theona incipiamus euoluere, necessarium reor ut initium conuersionis eius breui sermone perstringam, quia ex hoc uel meritum uiri uel gratia euidentius poterit patere lectori, hic igitur adulescens admodum parentum studio imperioque conexus est uinculo coniugali. nam dum pudicitiae eius religiosa sedulitate prospiciunt et ancipitem lapsum lubricae uerentur aetatis, praeueniendos adulescentiae motus licito nuptiarum remedio crediderunt. cum ergo hic unius lustri tempus cum coniuge peregisset, uenit ad abbatem Iohannem, qui tunc temporis merito mirae sanctitatis electus diaconiae praesidebat. non enim ad hunc gradum quilibet propria uoluntate aut ambitione prouehitur, sed is quem cunctorum seniorum coetus aetatis praerogatiua et fidei atque uirtutum testimonio excellentiorem omnibus sublimioremque censuerit. ad hunc, inquam, beatum Iohannem cum piae deuotionis studio praedictus tunc iuuenis aduenisset deferens religiosa donaria inter ceteros possessores, qui certatim decimas uel primitias frugum suarum memorato seni de suis substantiis offerebant, uideretque eos senex cum multis ad se muneribus confluxisse et deuotioni eorum uicissitudinem cuperet repensare, coepit eis secundum apostolum spiritalia seminare, quorum metebat dona carnalia. denique ita sermonem adhortationis instituit.
CHAPTER I. How Theonas came to Abbot John.
Before we begin to set forth the words of this Conference held with that excellent man Abbot Theonas, I think it well to describe in a brief discourse the origin of his conversion, because from this the reader will be able to see more clearly both the excellence and the grace of the man. He then while still very young was by the desire and command of his parents joined in the tie of marriage, for as with pious anxiety they were careful about his chastity, and were afraid of a critical fall at a dangerous age, they thought that the passions of youth might be anticipated by the remedy of a lawful marriage. When then he had lived for five years with a wife, he came to Abbot John, who was then for his marvellous sanctity chosen to preside over the administration of the alms. For it is not anyone who likes who is of his own wish or ambition promoted to this office, but only he whom the congregation of all the Elders considers from the advantage of his age and the witness of his faith and virtues to be more excellent than, and superior to, all others. To this blessed John then the aforesaid young man had come in the eagerness of his pious devotion, bringing gifts of piety among other owners who were eager to offer tithes and first-fruits of their substance to the old man I mentioned, and when the old man saw them pouring in upon him with many gifts, and was anxious to make some recompense in return for their offerings, he began, as the Apostle says, to sow spiritual things to them whose carnal gifts he was reaping. And finally thus began his word of exhortation.
II. Exhortatio abbatis Iohannis ad Theonan et ceteros qui cum eo conuenerant.
Delector quidem, o filii, pia uestrorum munerum largitate, et deuotionem huius oblationis, cuius dispensatio mihi credita est, gratanter amplector, quia fideliter primitias uestras ac decimas indigentum usibus profuturas uelut sacrificium domino bonae suauitatis offertis, harum scilicet oblatione plenitudinem quoque fructuum uniuersaeque substantiae uestrae, ex qua haec domino delibastis, ubertim benedicendam credentes uosque secundum mandati illius fidem multiplici ubertate bonorum omnium etiam in hoc saeculo cumulandos: honora dominum de tuis iustis laboribus, et deliba ei de fructibus iustitiae tuae: ut inpleantur horrea tua abundantiae tritici, et uino torcularia tua redundent. quam deuotionem fideliter exsequentes scitote uos legis antiquae consummasse iustitiam, sub qua tunc positi et transgredientes eam reatum ineuitabiliter incurrebant et implentes ad perfectionis apicem peruenire non poterant.
CHAPTER II. The exhortation of Abbot John to Theonas and the others who had come together with him.
I am indeed delighted, my children, with the duteous liberality of your gifts; and your devout offering, the disposal of which is entrusted to me, I gratefully accept, because you are offering your firstfruits and tithes for the good and use of the needy, as a sacrifice to the Lord, of a sweet smelling savour, in the belief that by the offering of them, the abundance of your fruits and all your substance, from which you have taken away these for the Lord, will be richly blessed, and that you yourselves will according to the faith of His command be endowed even in this world with manifold richness in all good things: "Honour the Lord from thy righteous labours, and offer to Him of the fruits of thy righteousness; that thy garners may be full of abundance of wheat, and thy vats may overflow with wine." And as you are faithfully carrying out this service, you may know that you have fulfilled the righteousness of the old law, under which those who then lived if they transgressed it inevitably incurred guilt, while if they fulfilled it they could not attain to a pitch of perfection.
III. De decimarum et primitiarum oblatione.
Decimae siquidem praecepto domini usibus Leuitarum, oblationes uero ac primitiae erant sacerdotibus consecratae. sed primitiarum hic erat modus, ut quinquagensima pars uel frugum uel animalium templi et sacerdotum ministerio praeberetur: quem modum tepidiores quique infideliter minuentes, religiosiores uero etiam cumulantes, illi ex sexagensima, hi autem ex quadragensima fructuum suorum parte pendebant. iusti enim, quibus lex non est posita, sic probantur non esse sub lege, ut iustitias legis non solum implere, uerum etiam superare contendant sitque deuotio eorum legali maior imperio, quae obseruantiam cumulans praeceptorum uoluntaria addat ad debita.
CHAPTER III. Of the offering of tithes and firstfruits.
For indeed by the Lord's command tithes were consecrated to the service of the Levites, but oblations and firstfruits for the priests. But this was the law of the firstfruits; viz., that the fiftieth part of fruits or animals should be given for the service of the temple and the priests: and this proportion some who were faithlessly indifferent diminished, while those who were very religious increased it, so that the one gave only the sixtieth part, and the other gave the fortieth part of their fruits. For the righteous, for whom the law is not enacted, are thus shown to be not under the law, as they try not only to fulfil but even to exceed the righteousness of the law, and their devotion is greater than the legal requirement, as it goes beyond the observance of precepts and adds to what is due of its own free will.
IIII. Quod Abraham, Dauid ceterique sancti legis mandata fuerint supergressi.
Ita namque Abraham futurae legis praecepta legimus supergressum, cum superatis quattuor regibus de spoliis Sodomorum, quae sibi uelut uictori non inmerito debebantur, et quidem rege ipso cuius spolia reduxerat suppliciter offerente, nihil penitus adquiescit adtingere, sub diuini nominis testificatione proclamans: extendo manum meam ad dominum excelsum, qui fecit caelum et terram, si a filo subteminis usque ad corrigiam caligae accipiam ex omnibus quae tua sunt, sic Dauid praecepta legis cognoscimus supergressum, qui praecipiente Moyse, ut inimicis talio redderetur, non solum hoc non fecit, uerum etiam dilectione conplexus est persequentes et pro his domino pie supplicans etiam lugubriter fleuit et ultus est interfectos. ita Heliam quoque et Hieremiam probamus non fuisse sub lege, qui cum licito uti coniugio absque reprehensione potuerint, uirgines tamen perseuerare maluerunt. sic Helisaeum ac reliquos eiusdem propositi uiros Moysaica legimus superasse mandata, de quibus apostolus ita dicit: circumierunt in melotis et in pellibus caprinis angustiati, adflicti, egentes, quibus dignus non erat mundus, in solitudinibus errantes et montibus et speluncis et in cauernis terrae. quid de filiis Ionadab filii Rechab dicam, quos Hieremiae prophetae offerenti ex praecepto domini uinum ita legimus respondisse: non bibimus uinum: quia Ionadab filius Rechab, pater noster, praecepit nobis, dicens: non bibetis uinum uos, et filii uestri usque in sempiternum: et domum non aedificabitis, et sementem non seretis, et uineas non plantabitis, nec habebitis: sed in tabernaculis habitabitis cunctis diebus uestris? unde etiam ab eodem propheta merentur audire: haec dicit dominus exercituum deus Israhel: non deficiet uir de stirpe Ionadab filii Rechab, stans in conspectu meo cunctis diebus. qui omnes offerre possessionum suarum decimas non contenti, sed ipsa praedia respuentes semet ipsos potius deo ac suas animas obtulerunt, pro quibus nulla ab homine commutatio fieri potest, sicut dominus in euangelio contestatur: quam dabit homo commutationem pro anima sua?
CHAPTER IV. How Abraham, David, and other saints went beyond the requirement of the law.
For so we read that Abraham went beyond the requirement of the law which was afterwards to be given, when after his victory over the four kings, he would not touch any of the spoils of Sodom, which were fairly due to him as the conqueror, and which indeed the king himself, whose spoils he had rescued, offered him; and with an oath by the Divine name he exclaimed: I lift up my hand to the Lord Most High, who made heaven and earth, that I will not take from a thread to a shoe's latchet of all that is thine." So we know that David went beyond the requirement of the law, as, though Moses commanded that vengeance should be taken on enemies, he not only did not do this, but actually embraced his persecutors with love, and piously entreated the Lord for them, and wept bitterly and avenged them when they were slain. So we are sure that Elijah and Jeremiah were not under the law, as though they might without blame have taken advantage of lawful matrimony, yet they preferred to remain virgins. So we read that Elisha and others of the same mode of life went beyond the commands of Moses, as of them the Apostle speaks as follows: "They went about in sheepskins and in goatskins, they were oppressed, afflicted, in want, of whom the world was not worthy, they wandered about in deserts and in mountains, and in caves and in dens of the earth." What shall I say of the sons of Jonadab the son of Rechab, of whom we are told that, when at the Lord's bidding the prophet Jeremiah offered them wine, they replied: "We drink no wine: for Jonadab the son of Rechab, our father, commanded us, saying: Ye shall drink no wine, ye and your sons forever: and ye shall build no house, nor sow any seed, nor plant vineyards nor possess them: but ye shall dwell in tents all your days"? Wherefore also they were permitted to hear from the same prophet these words: "Thus saith the Lord God of hosts, the God of Israel: there shall not fail a man from the stock of Jonadab the son of Rechab to stand in My sight all the days;" as all of them were not satisfied with merely offering tithes of their possessions, but actually refused property, and offered the rather to God themselves and their souls, for which no redemption can be made by man, as the Lord testifies in the gospel: "For what shall a man give in exchange for his own soul?"
V. Quod sub euangelii gratia agentes superare debeant mandata legalia.
Quapropter scire debemus nos, a quibus non iam exigitur legale mandatum, sed quibus euangelicus cotidie intonat sermo: si uis perfectus esse, uade uende omnia quae habes et da pauperibus, et habebis thesaurum in caelo, et ueni sequere me, cum decimas de substantiis nostris offerimus deo, adhuc quodammodo sub legis sarcina detineri et necdum ad euangelicum illud fastigium peruenisse, quod obtemperantes sibi non tantum praesentis uitae beneficiis, sed etiam futuris praemiis muneratur. lex enim factoribus suis non regnorum caelestium praemia, sed uitae huius solacia repromisit dicens: qui fecerit haec, uiuet in eis. dominus autem discipulis suis beati, inquit, pauperes spiritu, quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum, et: omnis qui reliquit domum uel fratres aut sorores aut patrem aut matrem aut uxorem aut filios aut agrum propter nomen meum, centuplum accipiet et uitam aeternam possidebit. nec inmerito. non enim tam laudabile est si ab inlicitis quam si etiam a licitis temperemus et his propter eius reuerentiam non utamur, qui ea nobis propter infirmitatem nostram utenda permisit. itaque si etiam hi, qui decimas fructuum suorum fideliter offerentes praeceptis domini antiquioribus famulantur, necdum possunt euangelicum culmen ascendere, illi qui ne haec quidem faciunt quantum ab eo absint manifestissime peruidetis. nam quemadmodum poterunt euangelicae gratiae esse participes, qui consummare etiam leuiora legis praecepta contemnunt? quorum facilitatem usque adeo imperiosa legislatoris uerba testantur, ut etiam maledictum non inplentibus proponatur: maledictus enim inquit qui non permanserit in omnibus quae scripta sunt in libro legis, ut faciat ea. hic autem pro sublimitate et excellentia dicitur mandatorum: qui potest capere capiat, illic legiferi uiolenta conpulsio praeceptorum indicat paruitatem: contestor enim inquit uobis hodie caelum et terram, quod si non custodieritis mandata domini dei uestri, peribitis a facie terrae. hic magnificentia sublimium mandatorum ipsa non tam imperantis quam adhortantis condicione signatur: si uis perfectus esse, uade, fac hoc aut illud. ibi inexcusabile etiam recusantibus Moyses pondus inponit, hic consilio tantum uolentibus et ad perfectionem festinantibus Paulus occurrit. non enim generaliter praecipiendum erat nec ut ita dixerim canonice ab omnibus exigendum id quod propter mirificam sublimitatem ab omnibus passim non potest adprehendi, sed consilio omnes potius prouocantur ad gratiam, ut hi qui magni sunt possint perfectione uirtutum non inmerito coronari, qui autem parui sunt et mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi inplere non possunt, licet fulgore maiorum uelut siderum tecti latere uideantur, tamen a tenebris maledictionum quae in lege sunt alieni nec praesentium malorum cladibus addicantur nec supplicio plectantur aeterno. non ergo Christus ad illa uirtutum excelsa fastigia praecepti quemquam necessitate constringit, sed liberi arbitrii prouocat potestate et salubritate consilii ac desiderio perfectionis accendit. ubi enim praeceptum, ibi necessitas, consequenter et poena, custodientes uero haec, ad quae praefixae legis seueritate coguntur, poenam potius quae ab illa intentabatur effugiunt quam mercedem aut praemia consequuntur.
CHAPTER V. How those who live under the grace of the Gospel ought to go beyond the requirement of the law.
Wherefore we ought to know that we from whom the requirements of the law are no longer exacted, but in whose ears the word of the gospel daily sounds: "If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell all that thou hast and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come follow Me," when we offer to God tithes of our substance, are still in a way ground down beneath the burden of the law, and not able to rise to those heights of the gospel, those who conform to which are recompensed not only by blessings in this present life, but also by future rewards. For the law promises to those who obey it no rewards of the kingdom of heaven, but only solaces in this life, saying: "The man that doeth these things shall live in them." But the Lord says to His disciples: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven;" and: "Everyone that leaveth house or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or field for My name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit eternal life." And this with good reason. For it is not so praiseworthy for us to abstain from forbidden as from lawful things, and not to use these last out of reverence for Him, Who has permitted us to use them because of our weakness. And so if even those who, faithfully offering tithes of their fruits, are obedient to the more ancient precepts of the Lord, cannot yet climb the heights of the gospel, you can see very clearly how far short of it those fall who do not even do this. For how can those men be partakers of the grace of the gospel who disregard the fulfilment even of the lighter commands of the law, to the easy character of which the weighty words of the giver of the law bear testimony, as a curse is actually invoked on those who do not fulfil them; for it says: "Cursed is everyone that does not continue in all things that are written in the book of the law to do them." But here on account of the superiority and excellence of the commandments it is said: "He that can receive it, let him receive it." There the forcible compulsion of the lawgiver shows the easy character of the precepts; for he says: "I call heaven and earth to record against you this day, that if ye do not keep the commandments of the Lord your God ye shall perish from off the face of the earth." Here the grandeur of sublime commands is shown by the very fact that He does not order, but exhorts, saying: "if thou wilt be perfect go" and do this or that. There Moses lays a burden that cannot be refused on those who are unwilling: here Paul meets with counsels those who are willing and eager for perfection. For that was not to be enjoined as a general charge, nor to be required, if I may so say, as a regular rule from all, which could not be secured by all, owing to its wonderful and lofty nature; but by counsels all are rather stimulated to grace, that those who are great may deservedly be crowned by the perfection of their virtues, while those who are small, and not able to come up to "the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ," although they seem to be lost to sight and hidden as it were by the brightness of larger stars, may yet be free from the darkness of the curses which are in the law, and not adjudged to suffer present evils or visited with eternal punishment. Christ therefore does not constrain anyone, by the compulsion of a command, to those lofty heights of goodness, but stimulates them by the power of free will, and urges them on by wise counsels and the desire of perfection. For where there is a command, there is duty, and consequently punishment. But those who keep those things to which they are driven by the severity of the law established escape the punishment with which they were threatened, instead of obtaining rewards and a recompense.
VI. Quod euangelii gratia, sicut perfectis tribuit regna caelorum, ita ueniabiliter sustentet infirmos.
Itaque sicut fortes ad sublimia atque praecelsa euangelicus sermo sustollit, ita non patitur infirmos ad ima demergi, perfectis quidem tribuens beatitudinis plenitudinem, ueniam uero inpertiens fragilitate superatis. lex enim consummantes praecepta sua in utriusque meriti uelut quodam meditullio conlocauit, quantum a transgressorum damnatione secernens, tantum separans a gloria perfectorum. quod quidem quam infimum quamque miserabile sit, uel ex praesentis uitae statu et conparatione perspicite, in qua miserrimum ducitur, si hoc tantum quis studeat ac laboret, ne reus tantummodo inter honestos homines et non etiam locuples et honorabilis et gloriosus habeatur.
CHAPTER VI. How the grace of the gospel supports the weak so that they can obtain pardon, as it secures to the perfect the kingdom of God.
And as the word of the gospel raises those that are strong to sublime and lofty heights, so it suffers not the weak to be dragged down to the depths, for it secures to the perfect the fulness of blessing, and brings to those who are overcome through weakness pardon. For the law placed those who fulfilled its commands in a sort of middle state between what they deserved in either case, severing them from the condemnation due to transgressors, as it also kept them away from the glory of the perfect. But how wretched and miserable this is, you can see from comparing the state of this present life, in which it is considered a very poor thing for a man to sweat and labour only to avoid being regarded as guilty among good men, not also to be esteemed rich and honourable and renowned.
VII. Quod in nostra situm sit potestate, utrum sub euangelii gratia an sub legis uelimus terrore consistere.
Quamobrem in nostra hodie situm est potestate, utrum sub euangelii gratia an sub legis uelimus terrore consistere: cuilibet enim parti pro qualitate actus sui unumquemque necesse est adgregari. nam aut supergredientes legem suscipit Christi gratia aut certe inferiores uelut debitores suos sibique obnoxios lex retentat. reus namque legalium praeceptorum nequaquam euangelicam perfectionem ualebit adtingere, quamuis Christianum se et domini gratia liberatum inaniter glorietur. non solum enim hic credendus est adhuc esse sub lege, qui ea quae lex praecipit detractat inplere, sed etiam ille, qui ea tantum quae lex iubet obseruare contentus est ac nequaquam uocationi et gratiae Christi condignos exhibet fructus, ubi non dicitur: decimas tuas et primitias offeres domino deo tuo, sed: uade uende omnia quae habes et da pauperibus, et habebis thesaurum in caelo, et ueni sequere me, ubi ob perfectionis magnificentiam discipulo postulanti ne breuissimum quidem horae spatium pro patris conceditur sepultura et humanae caritatis officium diuini amoris uirtute praeuertitur.
CHAPTER VII. How it lies in our own power to choose whether to remain under the grace of the gospel or under the terror of the law.
Wherefore it lies today in our own power whether we choose to live under the grace of the gospel or under the terrors of the law: for each man must incline to one side or the other in accordance with the character of his actions, for either the grace of Christ welcomes those who go beyond the law, or else the law keeps its hold over the weaker ones as those who are its debtors and within its clutches. For one who is guilty as regards the precepts of the law will never be able to attain to the perfection of the gospel, even though he idly boasts that he is a Christian and freed by the Lord's grace: for we must not only regard as still under the law the man who refuses to fulfil what the law enjoins, but the man as well who is satisfied with the mere observance of what the law commands, and who never brings forth fruits worthy of his vocation and the grace of Christ, where it is not said: "Thou shalt offer to the Lord thy God thy tithes and firstfruits;" but: "Go and sell all that thou hast and give to the poor, and come follow Me;" where, owing to the grandeur of perfection, to the request of the disciple there is not granted even the very short space of an hour in which to bury his father, as the offices of human charity are outweighed by the virtue of Divine love.
VIII. Quemadmodum Theonas coniugem suam, ut et ipsa renuntiaret, hortatus sit.
Quibus auditis beatus Theonas inextinguibili desiderio euangelicae perfectionis accensus semen uerbi fecundo corde conceptum quasi profundis atque edomitis sui pectoris condidit sulcis, in eo uel maxime humiliatus atque conpunctus, quod eum senex non solum euangelicam perfectionem non adtigisse dixisset, sed etiam uix legis ipsius adimplesse mandata. siquidem cum decimas frugum suarum solitus esset diaconiae annis singulis pendere, primitiarum rationem ne audisse quidem se aliquando deflebat: quam tamen etiamsi similiter implesset, longe nihilominus secundum senis sententiam se ab euangelica perfectione distare suppliciter fatebatur. ad domum itaque reuertitur maestus illaque adfectus tristitia, quae paenitentiam ad salutem stabilem operatur, ac de sua iam uoluntate et definitione non dubius erga salutem coniugis omnem mentis sollicitudinem curamque conuertit, eamque ad desiderium quo fuerat ipse succensus exhortatione coepit simili prouocare et ut deo pariter in sanctimonia et castitate seruirent diurnis nocturnisque fletibus monere, dicens conuersionem melioris uitae nequaquam esse lentandam, quia necessitati subitae mortis uana spes inmaturae non praeiudicaret aetatis, quippe quae pueros, adulescentes ac iuuenes pari ut senes sorte praeriperet.
CHAPTER VIII. How Theonas exhorted his wife that she too should make her renunciation.
And when he had heard this the blessed Theonas was fired with an uncontrollable desire for the perfection of the gospel, and, committed, as it were, the seed of the word, which he had received in a fruitful heart, to the deep and broken furrows of his bosom, as he was greatly humiliated and conscience-stricken because the old man had said not only that he had failed to attain to the perfection of the gospel, but also that he had scarcely fulfilled the commands of the law; since though he was accustomed every year to pay the tithes of his fruits as alms, yet he mourned that he had never even heard of the law of the firstfruits; and even if he had in the same way fulfilled this, he humbly confessed that still he would in the old man's view have been very far from the perfection of the gospel. And so he returned home sad and filled with that sorrow which worketh repentance unto salvation, and of his own will and determination turns all his wife's care and anxiety of mind towards salvation; and began to stir her up to the same eager desire with which he himself had been inflamed, with the same sort of exhortations, and with tears day and night to urge her that together they might serve God in sanctity and chastity, telling her that their conversion to a better life ought not to be deferred because a vain hope in their youth would be no argument against the inevitableness of a sudden death, which carries off boys and youths and young persons equally with old men.
VIIII. Quemadmodum non adquiescente uxore sua ad monasterium peruolarit.
Cumque huiusmodi obsecrationibus iugiter persistenti coniunx durissima non praeberet adsensum seque diceret solacio maritali pro aetatis suae flore penitus abstinere non posse, ac proinde si quid deserta ab eo criminis admisisset, illi potius adscribendum qui coniugii foedera disrupisset: ad haec ille, cum diu condicionem naturae praetendisset humanae, quam fragilem et incertam periculosum esset carnalibus desideriis et operibus diutius inplicari, adiciens adstruebat non licere cuiquam eius se boni extorrem facere cui omnimodis inhaerendum esse didicisset, maiorisque esse periculi despicere cognitam bonitatem quam incognitam non amare: proinde se iam reatu etiam praeuaricationis inuolui, si inuentis tam praeclaris tamque caelestibus bonis terrena ac sordida praetulisset. ad omnem sane aetatem omnemque sexum perfectionis magnificentiam pertinere et uniuersa ecclesiae membra ad conscendendam sublimium meritorum celsitudinem prouocari dicente apostolo: sic currite ut conprehendatis, nec propter lentorum et segnium moras paratos atque alacres debere subsistere, cum rectius sit ut desides a praecurrentibus incitentur quam ut properantes a residentibus obligentur. proinde statutum sibi decretumque esse renuntiare saeculo ac mori mundo, ut uiuere possit deo, et si hanc beatitudinem nequeat obtinere, ut cum socia sua in consortium transeat Christi, malle se uel cum unius membri dispendio saluum fieri et uelut debilem intrare in regna caelorum quam cum soliditate corporis condemnari. adiciebat autem etiam ista dicens: si Moyses pro duritia cordis dimitti permittit uxores, quare hoc non sinat Christus pro desiderio castitatis, praesertim cum idem dominus inter ceteras adfectiones, id est patrum matrumque ac filiorum, quibus omnem reuerentiam non solum lex sed etiam ipse praeceperat exhiberi, tamen pro nomine suo ac desiderio perfectionis non solum contemnenda simpliciter, sed etiam odio habenda esse decernens coniungat eis similiter etiam nomen uxorum dicens: et omnis qui reliquit domum uel fratres aut sorores aut patrem aut matrem aut uxorem aut filios propter nomen meum, centuplum accipiet et uitam aeternam possidebit. in tantum ergo perfectioni quam praedicat nihil patitur conparari, ut illam quoque necessitudinem solui patris ac matris, quae secundum apostolum primum obtinet in repromissione mandatum (honora scilicet patrem ac matrem, quod est mandatum primum in repromissione, ut bene sit tibi et sis longaeuus super terram), eamque despici pro suo amore praecipiat. euidenter itaque sicut eos euangelicus sermo condemnat qui non interueniente adulterii crimine uxoria uincla disrumpunt, ita ob amorem Christi et desiderium castitatis his qui iugum carnale reiecerunt etiam centupla praemia repromittit. quapropter si fieri potest, ut ad hanc mihi optatissimam partem accepta tandem ratione flectaris, scilicet ut domino seruientes poenam gehennae pariter euitemus, caritatem coniugii non refuto, immo etiam maiore adhuc dilectione conplector. agnosco enim et ueneror adiutricem meam domini mihi sententia deputatam et indisrupto eidem foedere caritatis in Christo cohaerere non respuo, nec a me separo quod dominus mihi primae statim conditionis lege coniunxit, dummodo sis et ipsa quod conditor esse te uoluit. si uero non adiutrix esse uolueris sed deceptrix et adminiculum te non mihi, sed aduersario malueris exhibere, atque ob hoc adtributum putas coniugii sacramentum, ut te huic quae ingeritur fraudans saluti insuper et me a discipulatu retrahas saluatoris, ita illam abbatis Iohannis, immo Christi ore prolatam sententiam uiriliter adprehendam, ut me a spiritali bono nulla carnalis auellere possit adfectio. qui enim non oderit, inquit, patrem et matrem et filios et fratres et sorores et uxorem et agros, insuper et animam suam, non potest meus esse discipulus. cum ergo his atque huiusmodi uerbis muliebris non flecteretur intentio et in eadem obstinationis duritia permaneret, si ego te, inquit beatus Theonas, abstrahere a morte non possum, nec tu me separabis a Christo: tutius est autem mihi cum homine quam cum deo habere diuortium. adspirante itaque gratia dei definitionis suae exsecutionem instanter adgressus est nec intepescere per aliquam moram desiderii sui est passus ardorem. nam confestim omni mundana facultate nudatus ad monasterium peruolauit, ubi in breui tanto splendore sanctitatis et humilitatis enituit, ut beatae memoriae Iohanne ad dominum ex hac luce migrante, sancto quoque Helia, uiro qui non minor decessore suo fuit, similiter decedente tertius Theonas uniuersorum electus iudicio in diaconiae eis dispensatione successerit.
CHAPTER IX. How he fled to a monastery when his wife would not consent.
And when his wife was hard and would not consent to him as he constantly persisted with entreaties of this kind, but said that as she was in the flower of her age she could not altogether do without the solace of her husband, and further that supposing she was deserted by him and fell into sin, the guilt would rather be his who had broken the bonds of wedlock: to this he, when he had for a long while urged the condition of human nature (which being so weak and uncertain, it would be dangerous for it to be any longer mixed up with carnal desires and works), added the assertion that it was not right for anyone to cut himself off from that virtue to which he had learnt that he ought by all means to cleave, and that it was more dangerous to disregard goodness when discovered, than to fail to love it before it was discovered; further that he was already involved in the guilt of a fall if when he had discovered such grand and heavenly blessings he had preferred earthly and mean ones. Further that the grandeur of perfection was open to every age and either sex, and that all the members of the Church were urged to scale the heights of heavenly goodness when the Apostle said: "So run that ye may obtain;" nor should those who were ready and eager for it hang back because of the delays of the slow and dawdlers, as it is better for the sluggards to be urged on by those running before than for those who are doing their best to be hampered by the slothful. Further that he had determined and made up his mind to renounce the world and to die to the world that he might live to God, and that if he could not attain this happiness; viz., to pass with his wife into union with Christ, he would rather be saved even with the loss of one member, and enter into the kingdom of heaven as one maimed rather than be condemned with his body whole. But he also added and spoke as follows: If Moses suffered wives to be divorced for the hardness of their hearts, why should not Christ allow this for the desire of chastity, especially when the same Lord among those other affections; viz., for fathers and mothers and children (all due regard to which not only the law but He Himself also charged to be shown, yet for His name's sake and for the desire of perfection He decreed that they should not simply be disregarded but actually hated)—to these, I say, He joined also the mention of wives, saying: "And everyone that hath left house, or brethren or sisters or father or mother or wife or children for My name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold and shall inherit eternal life." So far then is He from allowing anything to be set against that perfection which He is proclaiming, that He actually enjoins that the ties to father and mother should be broken and disregarded out of love for Him, though according to the Apostle it is the first commandment with promise; viz., "Honour thy father and thy mother, which is the first commandment with promise, that it may be well with thee and that thy days may be long upon earth." And as the word of the gospel condemns those who break the chains of matrimony where there has been no sin of adultery, so it clearly promises a reward of an hundredfold to those who have cast off a carnal yoke out of love for Christ and the desire for chastity. Wherefore if it can be brought about that you may listen to reason and be turned together with me to this most desirable choice; viz., that we should together serve the Lord and escape the pains of hell, I will not refuse the affection of marriage, nay I will embrace it with a still greater love. For I acknowledge and honour my helpmeet assigned to me by the word of the Lord, and I do not refuse to be joined to her in an unbroken tie of love in Christ, nor do I separate from me what the Lord joined to me by the law of the original condition, if only you yourself will be what your Maker meant you to be. But if you will not be a helpmeet, but prefer to make yourself a deceiver and an assistance not to me but to the adversary, and fancy that the sacrament of matrimony was granted to you for this reason that you may deprive yourself of this salvation which is offered to you, and also hold me back from following the Saviour as a disciple, then I will resolutely lay hold on the words which were uttered by the lips of Abbot John, or rather of Christ Himself, so that no carnal affection may be able to tear me away from spiritual blessings, for He says: "He that hateth not father and mother and children and brothers and sisters and wife and lands, yea and his own soul also, cannot be My disciple, When then by these and such like words the woman's purpose was not moved and she persisted in the same obstinate hardness, If, said the blessed Theonas, I cannot drag you away from death, neither shall you separate me from Christ: but it is safer for me to be divorced from a human person than from God. And so by the aid of God's grace he at once set about the execution of his purpose and suffered not the ardour of his desire to grow cool through any delay. For at once he stripped himself of all his worldly goods, and fled to a monastery, where in a very short time he was so famous for the splendour of his sanctity and humility that when John of blessed memory departed this life to the Lord, and the holy Elias, a man who was no less great than his predecessor, had likewise died, Theonas was chosen by the judgment of all as the third to succeed them in the administration of the almsgiving.
X. Satisfactio pro eo, ne discidia coniugibus suadere uideamur.
Nemo autem existimet nos haec ad prouocanda coniugiorum diuortia texuisse, qui non solum nuptias minime condemnamus, uerum etiam apostolicam sequentes sententiam dicimus: honorabile coniugium in omnibus et torus inmaculatus, sed ut lectori initium conuersionis, quo tantus ille uir deo dicatus est, fideliter panderemus. a quo bona gratia hoc primum deposco, ut, siue hoc ei placeat siue displiceat, quoquo modo me a calumnia alienum esse concedens in suo hoc factum aut laudet aut reprehendat auctore. ego autem, qui non meam super hac re sententiam prompsi, sed rei gestae historiam simplici narratione conplexus sum, aequum est, ut sicut mihi de eorum qui hoc factum probant laude nihil uindico, ita eorum qui id inprobant non pulser inuidia. habeat ergo suum de illo ut diximus unusquisque iudicium: sed moneo, ut ita censuram sui castiget examinis, ne se aequiorem aut sanctiorem diuino credat esse iudicio, quo in eum etiam apostolicarum conlata sunt signa uirtutum, ut taceam de tantorum patrum sententia, a quibus factum eius non solum minime reprehensum, uerum etiam usque adeo conlaudatum esse manifestum est, ut eum summis ac sublimissimis uiris in diaconiae electione praetulerint. et puto tot spiritalium uirorum deo auctore prolatum non errasse iudicium, quod etiam tanta signorum, ut supra iam dictum est, admiratio confirmabat.
CHAPTER X. An explanation that we may not appear to recommend separation from wives.
But let no one imagine that we have invented this for the sake of encouraging divorce, as we not only in no way condemn marriage, but also, following the words of the Apostle, say: "Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled," but it was in order faithfully to show the reader the origin of the conversion by which this great man was dedicated to God. And I ask the reader kindly to allow that, whether he likes this or no, in either case I am free from blame, and to give the praise or blame for this act to its real author. But as for me, as I have not put forward an opinion of my own on this matter, but have given a simple narration of the history of the facts, it is fair that as I claim no praise from those who approve of what was done, so I should not be attacked by the hatred of those who disapprove of it. Let every man therefore, as we said, have his own opinion on the matter. But I advise him to restrain his censure in considering it, lest he come to fancy that he is more just and holy than the Divine judgment, whereby the signs even of Apostolic virtue were conferred upon him (viz., Theonas), not to mention the opinion of such great fathers by whom it is clear that his action was not only not blamed, but even so far praised that in the election to the office of almoner they preferred him to splendid and most excellent men. And I fancy that the judgment of so many spiritual men, uttered with God as its author, was not wrong, as it was, as was said above, confirmed by such wonderful signs.
XI. Inquisitio, cur in Aegypto totis diebus Quinquagensimae non ieiunetur nec genua in oratione curuentur.
Sed iam tempus est ut promissae disputationis ordinem persequamur. igitur abba Theonas cum diebus Quinquagensimae nos in nostra cellula uisitasset, uespertina orationum sollemnitate transacta humi paululum considentes coepimus diligentius percontari, cur apud eos tanta obseruantia caueretur, ne quis penitus totis Quinquagensimae diebus uel genua in oratione curuaret uel usque ad horam nonam ieiunare praesumeret, eoque id diligentius scrutabamur, quod nequaquam hoc tanta cautione seruari in Syriae monasteriis uideramus.
CHAPTER XI. An inquiry why in Egypt they do not fast during all the fifty days (of Easter) nor bend their knees in prayer.
But it is now time to follow out the plan of the promised discourse. So then when. Abbot Theonas had come to visit us in our cell during Eastertide after Evensong was over we sat for a little while on the ground and began diligently to consider why they were so very careful that no one should during the whole fifty days either bend his knees in prayer or venture to fast till the ninth hour, and we made our inquiry the more earnestly because we had never seen this custom so carefully observed in the monasteries of Syria.
XII. Responsio de natura eorum quae bona uel mala uel media sunt.
Ad haec abba Theonas tali usus est sermonis exordio. oportet quidem nos auctoritati patrum consuetudinique maiorum usque ad nostrum tempus per tantam annorum seriem protelatae etiam non percepta ratione concedere eamque, ut antiquitus tradita est, iugi obseruantia ac reuerentia custodire. uerumtamen quoniam causas huius rei et rationem uultis agnoscere, accipite breuiter ea quae a senioribus nostris tradita super hac institutione conperimus. uerumtamen antequam scripturae diuinae auctoritas proferatur, si placet, de natura ipsius ieiunii et qualitate pauca dicamus, ut disputationem nostram subsequens scripturarum confirmet auctoritas. diuina sapientia per Ecclesiasten omni rei, id est uniuersis seu prosperis seu quae aduersa putantur et tristia tempus esse proprium designauit dicens: omnibus tempus est, et tempus omni rei sub caelo. tempus pariendi et tempus moriendi, tempus plantandi et tempus euellendi quod plantatum est, tempus occidendi et tempus sanandi, tempus destruendi et tempus aedificandi, tempus plorandi et tempus ridendi, tempus plangendi et tempus saltandi, tempus mittendi lapides et tempus colligendi lapides, tempus amplectendi et tempus longe fieri ab amplexu, tempus adquirendi et tempus perdendi, tempus custodiendi et tempus expellendi, tempus disrumpendi et tempus sarciendi, tempus tacendi et tempus loquendi, tempus amandi et tempus odiendi, tempus belli et tempus pacis, et infra quia tempus est, inquit, omni rei et omni facto, nihil igitur ex his bonum esse perpetuum definiuit, nisi cum fuerit horum quid oportune et conpetenter expletum, ita ut haec eadem, quae nunc oportune gesta bene cedunt, si inportuno uel incongruo tempore praesumantur, inutilia inueniantur et noxia, absque his dumtaxat quae per se principaliter uel bona uel mala sunt nec aliquando possunt in contrarium deriuari, ut est iustitia, prudentia, fortitudo, temperantia ceteraeque uirtutes siue e diuerso uitia, quorum definitiones in aliam partem cadere omnino mutariue non possunt. si qua uero in utrumque effectum possunt aliquando transire, ut pro qualitate utentium uel bona inueniantur uel mala, haec non absolute pro sua natura, sed pro perpetrantis adfectu et oportunitate temporis uel utilia interdum uel noxia sentiuntur.
CHAPTER XII. The answer on the nature of things good, bad, and indifferent.
To this Abbot Theonas thus began his reply. It is indeed right for us, even when we cannot see the reason, to yield to the authority of the fathers and to a custom of our predecessors that has been continued through so many years down to our own time, and to observe it, as handed down from antiquity, with constant care and reverence. But since you want to know the reasons and grounds for this, receive in few words what we have heard as handed down by our Elders on this subject. But before we bring forward the authority of Holy Scripture, we will, if you please, say a little about the nature and character of the fast, that afterwards the authority of Holy Scripture may support our words. The Divine Wisdom has pointed out in Ecclesiastes that for everything, i.e., for all things happy or those which are considered unfortunate and unhappy, there is a right time: saying: "For all things there is a time, and a time for everything under the heaven. A time to bring forth and a time to die; a time to plant and a time to pull down what is planted; a time to kill and a time to heal; a time to destroy and a time to build; a time to weep and a time to laugh; a time to mourn and a time to dance; a time to cast away stones and a time to gather stones; a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing; a time to get and a time to lose; a time to keep and a time to send away; a time to scatter and a time to collect; a time to be silent and a time to speak; a time to love and a time to hate; a time for war and a time for peace;" and below: "For there is a time," it says, "for everything and for every deed." None therefore of these things does it lay down as always good, but only when any of them are fittingly done and at the right time, so that these very things which at one time, when done at the right moment, turn out well, if they are ventured on at a wrong or unsuitable time, are found to be useless or harmful; only excepting those things which are in their own nature good or bad, and which cannot ever be made the opposite, as, e.g., justice, prudence, fortitude, temperance and the rest of the virtues, or on the other hand, those faults, the description of which cannot possibly be altered or fall under the other head. But those things which can sometimes turn out with either result, so that, in accordance with the character of those who use them, they are found to be either good or bad, these we consider to be not absolutely in their own natures useful or injurious, but only so in accordance with the mind of the doer, and the suitableness of the time.
XIII. Quale bonum sit ieiunium.
Quamobrem nunc quaerendum est quid super ieiuniorum statu decernere debeamus, utrumnam similiter et ipsum bonum esse eo modo quo iustitiam, prudentiam, fortitudinem ac temperantiam diximus, quae in partem contrariam penitus transire non possunt, an medium quid, quod interdum factum possit prodesse et interdum praetermissum condemnare non possit, quodque nonnumquam egisse reprehensibile sit, nonnumquam praetermisisse laudabile. si enim in illa definitione uirtutum etiam ieiunium censeamus, ut inter principalia bona ciborum abstinentia conlocetur, erit profecto eorum mala et criminosa perceptio. quidquid enim principali bono contrarium est, sine dubio principale malum esse censendum est. quod definiri a nobis scripturarum sanctarum non permittit auctoritas. si enim tali sensu ac proposito ieiunemus, ut peccatum contrahi in escarum participatione credamus, non modo nullos fructus pro abstinentia consequemur, sed etiam reatum maximum ac sacrilegii crimen secundum apostolum contrahemus, abstinentes a cibis, quos deus creauit ad percipiendum cum gratiarum actione fidelibus et his qui cognouerunt ueritatem. quia omnis creatura dei bona, et nihil reiciendum quod cum gratiarum actione percipitur. qui enim putat quid commune esse, illi commune est. et idcirco ob solam perceptionem escae neminem legimus condemnatum, nisi forte iunctum quid fuerit uel postea subsecutum, per quod meruerit condemnari.
CHAPTER XIII. What kind of good fasting is.
Wherefore we must now inquire what we ought to hold about the state of fasting, whether we meant that it was good in the same sort of way as justice, prudence, fortitude and temperance, which cannot possibly be made anything else, or whether it is something indifferent which sometimes is useful when done, and may be sometimes omitted without condemnation; and which sometimes it is wrong to do, and sometimes laudable to omit. For if we hold fasting to be included in that list of virtues, so that abstinence from food is placed among those things which are good in themselves, then certainly the partaking of food will be bad and wrong. For whatever is the opposite of that which is in its own nature good, must certainly be held to be in its own nature bad. But this the authority of Holy Scripture does not allow to us to lay down. For if we fast with such thoughts and intentions, so as to think that we fall into sin by taking food, we shall not only gain no advantage by our abstinence but shall actually contract grievous guilt and fall into the sin of impiety, as the Apostle says: "Abstaining from meats which God has created to be received with thanksgiving by the faithful and those who know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused if it is partaken of with thanksgiving." For "if a man thinks that a thing is common, to him it is common." And therefore we never read that anyone is condemned simply for taking food, but only when something was joined with it or followed afterwards, for which he deserved condemnation.
XIIII. Quod non sit principale bonum ieiunium.
Itaque hoc medium esse etiam ex hoc manifestissime declaratur, quia sicut iustificat custoditum, ita non condemnat inruptum, nisi forte praecepti transgressio magis quam escarum perceptio puniatur. principali autem bono ita nullum esse oportet uacuum tempus, ut sine eo cuiquam esse non liceat, quia necesse est cessatione eius in malum conruere neglegentem. nec rursum principali malo ullum conceditur tempus, quia quod noxium semper est, numquam poterit, si admissum fuerit, non nocere uel in partem umquam laudabilem conmutari. ac perinde haec, quibus qualitates statutas uidemus et tempora et quae sic obseruata sanctificant ut omissa non polluant, media esse manifestum est, ut puta nuptias, agriculturam, diuitias, solitudinis remotionem, uigilias, sacrorum lectionem meditationemque librorum ipsaque ieiunia, de quibus principium sermonis exortum est. quae omnia diuina praeceptio uel sanctarum auctoritas scripturarum non ita incessabiliter obtinenda nec iugiter custodienda decreuit, ut ea paululum intermisisse nefarium sit. quidquid enim imperatiue decernitur, mortem inrogat non inpletum: quaecumque uero suadentur potius quam iubentur, facta prosunt, infacta non puniunt. et idcirco aut omnia haec aut certe quaedam pro causa, pro loco, pro modo, pro tempore circumspecte agere nos maiores nostri et prouide obseruare iusserunt, quia si congrue horum aliquid actitetur, aptum atque conueniens, si incongrue, ineptum esse constat ac noxium. acsi uelit quis in fratris aduentu, in quo Christum debet humanitate reficere et gratissima susceptione conplecti, austeritatem ieiunii custodire, nonne inhumanitatis potius crimen incurrit quam laudem aut meritum religionis adquirit? uel si, cum defectio et inbecillitas carnis reparationem uirium escae perceptione deposcit, non adquiescat aliquis rigorem abstinentiae relaxare, nonne magis crudelis sui corporis homicida quam salutis prouisor est aestimandus? ita etiam cum tempus festiuitatis escarum congruum fotum et refectionem necessariae absolutionis indulget, si quis ieiuniorum rigidam obseruantiam indisrupte uoluerit retentare, necesse est ut non tam religiosus quam inconditus atque inrationabilis habeatur. sed et illis haec nihilominus repperientur aduersa, qui humanam laudem ieiuniis aucupantur et inani ostentatione palloris famam sanctitatis adquirunt, quos in praesenti suam recepisse mercedem euangelicus sermo pronuntiat, uel quorum per prophetam dominus ieiunium detestatur. ad quorum personam cum sibi obiciens ante dixisset: quare ieiunauimus, et non aspexisti: humiliauimus animas nostras, et nescisti? confestim subiciens prodidit causas, cur non merentur audiri: ecce, inquit, in diebus ieiunii uestri inuenietur uoluntas uestra, et omnes debitores uestros repetitis. ecce ad lites et contentiones ieiunatis, et percutitis pugno impie. nolite ieiunare sicut usque ad hanc diem, ut audiatur in excelso clamor uester. numquid tale est ieiunium, quod elegi, per diem adfligere hominem animam suam? numquid contorquere quasi circulum caput suum, et saccum et cinerem sternere? numquid istud uocabitis ieiunium, et diem acceptabilem domino? deinde infert docens quomodo acceptabilis fiat continentia ieiunantis atque euidenter enuntiat per se solum ieiunium prodesse non posse, nisi has quae subiciuntur causas habuerit consequentes, nonne hoc est, inquiens, ieiunium, quod elegi? dissolue conligationes impietatis, solue fasciculos deprimentes, dimitte eos, qui confracti sunt, liberos, et omne onus disrumpe. frange esurienti panem tuum, et egenos, uagosque indue in domum tuam: cum uideris nudum, operi eum, et carnem tuam ne despexeris. tunc erumpet quasi mane lumen tuum, et sanitas tua citius orietur, et anteibit faciem tuam iustitia tua, et gloria domini colliget te. tunc inuocabis, et dominus exaudiet te: clamabis, et dicet: ecce adsum. uidetis ergo ieiunium nequaquam principale bonum a domino iudicari, eo quod non per semet ipsum, sed per alia opera bonum ac deo bene placitum fiat et rursum ex accedentibus causis non solum uanum, uerum etiam odibile censeatur dicente domino: cum ieiunauerint, non exaudiam preces eorum.
CHAPTER XIV. How fasting is not good in its own nature.
And so that it is a thing indifferent is very clearly shown from this also; viz., because as it brings justification when observed, so it does not bring condemnation when it is broken in upon; unless perhaps the transgression of a command rather than the partaking of food brings punishment. But in the case of a thing that is good in its own nature, no time should be without it, in such a way as that a man may do without it, for if it ceases, the man who is careless about it is sure to fall into mischief. Nor again is any time given for what is bad in its own nature, because what is hurtful cannot help hurting, if it is indulged in, nor can it ever be made of a praiseworthy character. And further it is clear that these things, for which we see conditions and times appointed, and which sanctify, when observed without corrupting us when they are neglected, are things indifferent, as, e.g., marriage, agriculture, riches, retirement into the desert, vigils, reading and meditation on Holy Scripture and fasting itself, from which our discussion took its rise. All of which things the Divine precepts and the authority of Holy Scripture decreed should not be so incessantly aimed at, or so constantly observed, as for it to be wrong for them to be for a time intermitted. For anything that is absolutely commanded brings death if it be not fulfilled: but whatever things we are urged to rather than commanded, when done are useful, when left undone bring no punishment. And therefore in the case of all or some of these things our predecessors commanded us either to do them with consideration, or to observe them carefully with regard to the reason, place, manner, and time, because if any of them are done suitably, it is fit and convenient, but if incongruously, then it becomes foolish and hurtful. And if at the coming of a brother, in whose person he ought to refresh Christ with courtesy and to embrace him with a most kindly welcome, a man should choose to observe a strict fast, would he not rather be guilty of incivility than gain the praise or reward of devoutness? or if when the failure or weakness of the flesh requires the strength to be restored by the partaking of food, a man will not consent to relax the rigour of his abstinence, is he not to be regarded as a cruel murderer of his own body rather than as one who is careful for his salvation? So too when a festival season permits a suitable indulgence in food and a necessarily liberal repast, if a man will resolutely cling to the strict observance of a fast he must be considered as not religious so much as boorish and unreasonable. But to those men also will these things be found bad, who are on the lookout for the praises of men by their fasts, and by a foolish show of paleness gain credit for sanctity, of whom the word of the Gospel tells us that they have received their reward in this life, and whose fast the Lord execrates by the prophet. In whose person he first objected to himself and said: "Wherefore have we fasted and Thou hast not regarded: wherefore have we humbled our souls, and Thou hast not known it?" and then at once he answered and explained the reasons why they did not deserve to be heard: "Behold," he says, "in the days of your fast your own will is found and you exact of all your debtors. Behold you fast for debates and strife, and strike with the fist wickedly. Do not fast as ye have done unto this day, to make your cry to be heard on high. Is this such a fast as I have chosen, for a man to afflict his soul for a day? Is it this, to wind his head about like a circle, and to spread sackcloth and ashes? Will ye call this a fast and a day acceptable to the Lord?" Then he proceeds to teach how the abstinence of one who fasts may become acceptable, and clearly lays down that fasting cannot be good of itself alone, but only when it has the following reasons which are added: "Is not this," he says, "the fast that I have chosen? Loose the bands of wickedness, undo the bundles that oppress, let them that are broken go free, and break asunder every burden. Deal thy bread to the hungry, and bring the needy and the harbourless into thine house: and when thou shalt see one naked cover him, and despise not thine own flesh. Then shalt thy light break forth as the morning and thy health shall speedily arise, and thy righteousness shall go before thy face and the glory of the Lord shall gather thee up. Then shalt thou call, and the Lord shall hear: thou shalt cry, and He shall say, Here am I." You see then that fasting is certainly not considered by the Lord as a thing that is good in its own nature, because it becomes good and well-pleasing to God not by itself but by other works, and again from the surrounding circumstances it may be regarded as not merely vain but actually hateful, as the Lord says: "When they fast I will not hear their prayers."
XV. Quod principale bonum non propter inferius bonum debeat exerceri.
Non enim misericordia, patientia et caritas uel illa praedictarum praecepta uirtutum, in quibus utique bonum est principale, propter ieiunia sunt tenenda, sed potius ieiunia propter illa, elaborandum est enim ut uirtutes illae, quae uere bonae sunt, ieiuniis adquirantur, non ut ad ieiuniorum terminum tendant illa exercitia uirtutum. ob hoc ergo est utilis carnis adflictio, ob hoc ei adhibenda est inediae medicina, ut per illam ad caritatem, in qua inmobile ac sine ulla temporis exceptione perpetuum bonum est, peruenire possimus. neque enim medicinae, aurificinae uel ceterarum quae in hoc mundo sunt artium disciplinae propter instrumenta quae ad eius opus pertinent exercentur et non potius ferramenta propter artis exercitium praeparantur. quae sicut utilia sunt peritis, ita superflua his qui artis ipsius nesciunt disciplinam, et sicut his, qui ad efficiendum opus suum eorum ministerio fulciuntur, plurimum prosunt, ita illis, qui cuius rei gratia instituta sint ignorantes sola eorum possessione contenti sunt, penitus prodesse non possunt, quia utilitatis suae summam in retentatione eorum tantum, non in operis consummatione constituunt. illud ergo est optimum principaliter, propter quod fiunt illa quae media sunt, ipsum uero praecipuum bonum non ob aliam causam, sed propter suam tantum agitur bonitatem.
CHAPTER XV. How a thing that is good in its own nature ought not to be done for the sake of some lesser good.
For we ought not to practise pity, patience and love, and the precepts of the virtues mentioned above, wherein there is what is good in its own nature, for the sake of fasting, but rather fasting for the sake of them. For our endeavour must be that those virtues which are really good may be gained by fasting, not that the practice of those virtues may lead to fasting as its end. For this then the affliction of the flesh is useful, for this the remedy of abstinence must be employed; viz., that by it we may succeed in attaining to love, wherein there is what is good without change, and continually with no exception of time. For medicines, and the goldsmith's art, and the systems of other arts which there are in this world are not employed for the sake of the instruments which belong to the particular work; but rather the implements are prepared for the practice of the art. And as they are useful for those who understand them, so they are useless to those who are ignorant of the system of the art in question; and as they are a great help to those who rely on their aid for doing their work, so they cannot be of the smallest use to those who do not know for what purpose they were made, and are contented simply with the possession of them; because they make all their value consist in the mere having of them, and not in the performance of work. That then is in its own nature the best thing, for the sake of which things indifferent are done, but the very chiefest good is done not for the sake of anything else but because of its own intrinsic goodness.
XVI. Quomodo a ceteris bonis principale discernatur bonum.
Quod quidem a ceteris, quae media esse praediximus, his secernitur modis: si per se bonum sit et non per aliud aliquid: si propter se necessarium sit et non propter aliud: si inmutabiliter semperque sit bonum ac perpetuo suam retinens qualitatem numquam possit in partem transire contrariam: si ademptio uel cessatio eius non possit non summam inferre perniciem: si id quod illi contrarium est similiter principale sit malum nec in partem bonam possit aliquando transire, quae definitiones, quibus principalium bonorum natura discernitur, adscribi ieiuniis omnino non possunt. neque enim ex semet ipsis bona aut propter se necessaria sunt, quia propter adquirendam cordis et corporis puritatem salubriter exercentur, ut aculeis carnis obtunsis mens pacifica suo reconcilietur auctori, nec inmutabiliter semperque sunt bona, quia plerumque eorum intermissione non laedimur, immo etiam in perniciem interdum animae inportunius celebrata uertuntur. sed nec principale malum est id quod illi uidetur aduersum, id est ciborum naturaliter iucunda perceptio: quae, nisi intemperantia atque luxuria uel alia quaedam uitia subsequantur, mala non potest definiri, quia non quod intrat in os, coinquinat hominem, sed quae procedunt de ore, haec coinquinant hominem. principali itaque derogat bono nec perfecte aut sine peccato illud exsequitur, quisquis id non propter se, sed propter aliud aliquid facit. omnia enim huius gratia facienda sunt, ipsum uero propter se solum est expetendum.
CHAPTER XVI. How what is good in its own nature can be distinguished from other things that are good.
And this may be distinguished from those other things which we have termed indifferent, in these ways: if a thing is good in itself and not by reason of something else: if it is useful for its own sake, and not for the sake of something else: if it is unchangeably and at all times good, and always keeps its character and can never become anything different: if its removal or cessation cannot fail to produce the greatest harm: if that which is its opposite is in the same way evil in its own nature, and can never be turned into anything good. And these descriptions by which the nature of things that are good in themselves can be distinguished, cannot possibly be applied to fasting, for it is not good of itself, nor useful for its own sake because it is wisely used for the acquisition of purity of heart and body, that the pricks of the flesh being dulled the soul may be pacified and reconciled to its Creator, nor is it unchangeably and at all times good, because often we are not injured by its intermission, and indeed sometimes if it is unreasonably practised it becomes injurious. Nor is that which seems its opposite evil in its own nature, i.e., the partaking of food, which is naturally agreeable, which cannot be regarded as evil, unless intemperance and luxury or some other faults are the result; "For not that which entereth into the mouth, defileth a man, but that which cometh out of the mouth, that defileth a man." And so a man disparages what is good in its own nature, and does not treat it properly or without sin, if he does it not for its own sake but for the sake of something else, for everything else should be done for the sake of it, but it should be sought for its own sake alone.
XVII. De ratione et utilitate ieiunii.
Talem igitur definitionem super ieiunii qualitate iugiter retinentes ita illud totis animi uiribus adpetamus, ut tamen tunc demum id nobis congruum nouerimus, si in eo temporum ratio, si qualitas, si mensura seruetur, nec ita ut in ipso spei nostrae terminum defigamus, sed ut per ipsum ad puritatem cordis et apostolicam caritatem peruenire possimus. igitur ex hoc ipso ieiunium, cui non solum specialia praefixa sunt tempora quibus uel exerceri debeat uel remitti, sed etiam qualitas modusque propositus est, non principale bonum, sed medium quiddam esse manifestum est. ceterum haec, quae praecepti auctoritate uel mandantur ut bona uel interdicuntur ut noxia, numquam ita exceptioni temporum subiacent, ut interdum aut quae uetita sunt fieri debeant aut quae imperata sunt praetermitti. nec enim ullus iustitiae, patientiae, sobrietati, pudicitiae, caritati statutus est modus, nec rursum iniustitiae, inpatientiae, furori, inpudicitiae, inuidiae atque superbiae libertas aliquando permissa est.
CHAPTER XVII. Of the reason for fasting and its value.
So then let us constantly remember this description of the character of fasting, and always aim at it with all the powers of the soul, in such a way as to recognize that then only is it suitable for us if in it we preserve regard for time, its character and degree, and this not so as to set the end of our hope upon it, but so that by it we may succeed in attaining to purity of heart and Apostolical love. Therefore from this it is clear that fasting, for which not only are there special seasons appointed at which it should be practised or relaxed, but conditions and rules also laid down, is not good in its own nature, but something indifferent. But those things which are either enjoined as good by the authority of a precept, or are forbidden as bad, are never subject to any exceptions of time in such a way that sometimes we should do what is forbidden or omit what is commanded. For there is no limit set to justice, patience, soberness, modesty, love, nor on the other hand is a licence ever granted for injustice, impatience, wrath, immodesty, envy, and pride.
XVIII. Non semper congruum esse ieiunium.
Quamobrem his de ieiunii qualitate praemissis subdenda adhuc sanctarum scripturarum uidetur auctoritas, per quam manifestius adprobetur ieiunium perpetuo custodiri nec debere nec posse, in euangelio ieiunantibus Pharisaeis una cum discipulis Iohannis Baptistae cum apostoli, utpote amici atque conuiuae caelestis illius sponsi, necdum ieiuniorum obseruantiam custodirent, discipuli Iohannis, qui summam iustitiae se ieiuniis possidere credebant, quippe illius sectatores qui eximius paenitentiae praedicator ita cunctis populis formam suo praebebat exemplo, ut non solum uaria escarum genera quae humanis usibus subgeruntur abnueret, uerum etiam communem panis ipsius esum penitus ignoraret, domino conqueruntur dicentes: quare nos et Pharisaei ieiunamus frequenter, discipuli autem tui non ieiunant? quibus respondens dominus euidenter ostendit non omni tempore congruum esse ieiunium nec necessarium, cum aliqua uel festiuitas temporum uel interueniens caritatis occasio indulgentiam refectionis admittit, numquid possunt, inquiens, filii sponsi lugere quamdiu cum illis est sponsus? uenient autem dies cum ab eis auferetur sponsus, et tunc ieiunabunt. quae uerba licet ante resurrectionem dixerit corporis sui, tamen proprie Quinquagensimae tempus ostendunt, in quo post resurrectionem per quadraginta dies domino cum discipulis epulante ieiunare illos cotidianae eius praesentiae gaudium non sinebat.
CHAPTER XVIII. How fasting is not always suitable.
Wherefore as we have premised this on the conditions of fasting, it seems well to subjoin the authority of Holy Scripture, by which it will be more clearly proved that fasting neither can nor should be always observed. In the Gospel when the Pharisees were fasting together with the disciples of John the Baptist, as the Apostles, as friends and companions of the heavenly Bridegroom, were not yet keeping the observance of a fast, the disciples of John (who thought that they acquired perfect righteousness by their fasts, as they were followers of that grand preacher of repentance who afforded a pattern to all the people by his own example, as he not only refused the different kinds of food which are supplied for man's use, but actually altogether did without eating the bread which is common to all) complained to the Lord and said: "Why do we and the Pharisees fast oft but thy disciples fast not?" to whom the Lord in His reply plainly showed that fasting is not suitable or necessary at all times, when any festival season or opportunity for love intervenes and permits an indulgence in food, saying: "Can the children of the bridegroom mourn while the bridegroom is with them? But the days will come when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them; and then shall they fast;" words which although they were spoken before the resurrection of His Body, yet specially point to the season of Eastertide, in which after His resurrection for forty days He ate with His disciples, and their joy in His daily Presence did not allow them to fast.
XVIIII. Interrogatio, cur totis Quinquagensimae diebus ieiunium resoluamus.
Germanus: Quare igitur tota Quinquagensima abstinentiae rigorem prandiis relaxamus, cum utique Christus quadraginta tantum diebus post resurrectionem cum discipulis fuerit conmoratus?
CHAPTER XIX. A question why we break the fast all through Eastertide.
Germanus: Why then do we relax the rigour of our abstinence in our meals all through the fifty days, whereas Christ only remained with His disciples for forty days after His resurrection?
XX. Responsio.
Theonas: Non incongrua interrogatio uestra rationem integerrimae ueritatis meretur agnoscere. post ascensionem saluatoris nostri, quae quadragensima resurrectionis eius acta est die, apostoli reuersi de monte Oliueti, in quo se ad patrem pergens praebuit intuendum, sicut etiam Actuum apostolorum lectio contestatur, ingressi Hierosolymam decem diebus aduentum spiritus sancti expectasse referuntur, quibus expletis quinquagensima eum die cum gaudio susceperunt. et ita est per haec festiuitatis huius numerus euidenter inpletus, quem in ueteri quoque legimus testamento figuraliter adumbratum, in quo consummatis ebdomadibus septem primitiarum panis per sacerdotes domino iubebatur offerri: qui uerissime per apostolorum praedicationem, qua in illo die contionati leguntur ad populum, oblatus domino conprobatur, uerus scilicet primitiarum panis, qui nouae doctrinae institutione prolatus quinque milibus uirorum escae suae munere satiatis primitiuum de Iudaeis Christianorum populum domino consecrauit. et idcirco hi quoque decem dies cum superioribus quadraginta pari sollemnitate sunt ac laetitia celebrandi. cuius festiuitatis traditio per apostolicos uiros ad nos usque transmissa eodem tenore seruanda est. ideo namque in ipsis diebus nec genua in oratione curuantur, quia inflexio genuum uelut paenitentiae ac luctus indicium est. unde etiam per omnia eandem in illis sollemnitatem quam die dominica custodimus, in qua maiores nostri nec ieiunium agendum nec genu flectendum ob reuerentiam resurrectionis dominicae tradiderunt.
CHAPTER XX. The answer.
Your pertinent question deserves to be told the perfect true reason. After the Ascension of our Saviour which took place on the fortieth day after His Resurrection, the apostles returned from the Mount of Olives, on which He had suffered them to see Him when He was returning to the Father, as the book of the Acts of the Apostles also testifies, and entered Jerusalem and are said to have waited ten days for the coming of the Holy Ghost, and when these were fulfilled on the fiftieth day they received Him with joy. And thus in this way the number of this festival was clearly made up, which as we read was figuratively foreshadowed also in the Old Testament, where when seven weeks were fulfilled the bread of the firstfruits was ordered to be offered by the priests to the Lord: and this was indeed shown to be offered to the Lord by the preaching of the Apostles which they are said on that day to have addressed to the people; the true bread of the firstfruits, which when produced from the instruction of a new doctrine, consecrated the firstfruits of the Jews as a Christian people to the Lord, five thousand men being filled with the gifts of the food. And therefore these ten days are to be kept with equal solemnity and joy as the previous forty. And the tradition about this festival, transmitted to us by Apostolic men, should be kept with the same uniformity. For therefore on those days they do not bow their knees in prayer, because the bending of the knees is a sign of penitence and mourning. Wherefore also during these days we observe in all things the same solemnities as on Sunday, on which day our predecessors taught that men ought not to fast nor to bow the knee, out of reverence for the Lord's Resurrection.
XXI. Interrogatio, utrum abstinentia ieiunii relaxata non obsit corporis castitati.
Germanus: Potestue haec caro insolitis blandimentis tam longae festiuitatis inlecta non aliquid sentuosum de illo quamuis absciso uitiorum fomite germinare, aut mens praesumptis ultra consuetudinem dapibus onerata non erga famulum corpus rigorem dominationis inflectere, praesertim cum in nobis uiridior aetas cito ad rebellionem subdita membra possit conpellere, si uel escas solitas abundantius uel certe insolitas licentius praesumamus?
CHAPTER XXI. A question whether the relaxation of the fast is not prejudicial to the chastity of the body.
Germanus: Can the flesh, attracted by the unwonted luxuries of so long a festival fail to produce something thorny from the incentives to sin although they have been cut down? or can the soul weighed down by the consumption of unaccustomed feasts fail to mitigate the rigour of its rule over its servant the body, especially when in our case our mature age can excite our subject members to a speedy revolt, if we venture to take our usual food in larger quantities, or unaccustomed food more freely than usual?
XXII. Responsio de seruando continentiae temperamento.
Theonas: Si rationabili mentis uniuersa quae gerimus adpendamus examine et de puritate cordis nostri non aliorum iudicia, sed nostram semper conscientiam consulamus, certum est istam refectionis intercapedinem iustae districtioni obesse non posse, si modo ut dictum est aequam indulgentiae continentiaeque mensuram pari lance perpendens utramque similiter nimietatem mens incorrupta castiget, et utrum spiritum nostrum deliciarum deprimat pondus, an uero alteram hoc est corporis partem maior abstinentiae inclinet austeritas, uera discretione distinguat, illam uel conprimens uel subleuans portionem, quam uel extolli senserit uel grauari. nihil enim dominus noster ad cultum atque honorem suum absque iudicii moderatione uult fieri, quia honor regis iudicium diligit. et idcirco sapientissimus Salomon, ut in neutram partem uergente iudicio declinemus, admonet dicens: honora deum de tuis iustis laboribus, et deliba ei de fructibus iustitiae tuae. etenim residet in conscientia nostra incorruptus quidam ac uerus iudex, qui nonnumquam super statu puritatis nostrae cunctis errantibus solus ipse non fallitur. omni igitur cautione atque sollertia iugis circumspecti cordis seruetur intentio, ne quo modo iudicio nostrae discretionis errante aut inconsideratae continentiae cupiditate succensi aut desiderio nimiae remissionis inlecti substantiam uirium nostrarum ad iniquae trutinae libremus examen, sed in altera quidem lance animae puritatem, in altera autem uires corporis conlocantes ita uero conscientiae iudicio utraque pendamus, ut in neutram partem unius rei adfectu praeponderante peruersi uel ad inmodicam districtionem uel ad nimiam remissionem aequitatis libram propensius inclinemus, et illud nobis uel pro remissionis uel pro districtionis nimietate dicatur: nonne si recte offeras, non recte autem diuidas, peccasti? illas etenim ieiuniorum uictimas, quas nobis uiolenta uiscerum conuulsione inconsiderate extorquentes domino recte offerre nos credimus, ille qui diligit misericordiam et iudicium execratur dicens: ego dominus diligens iudicium, odio habens rapinam in holocausto. illos etiam qui oblationum id est officiorum atque actuum suorum praecipua ad fotum carnis atque usus proprios praesumentes reliquias eorum domino ac minimam deferunt portionem, uelut operarios fraudulentos sermo diuinus ita condemnat: maledictus qui facit opera domini fraudulenter. non ergo inmerito eum, qui se ita iniquo fallit examine, increpat dominus dicens: uerumtamen uani filii hominum, mendaces filii hominum in stateris, ut decipiant. et idcirco beatus apostolus, ut discretionis moderamina retinentes in neutram partem inlecti nimietate uergamur, admonet dicens: rationabile obsequium uestrum. quam rem etiam legislator similiter interdicit ita praecipiens: statera iusta, et aequa sint pondera, iustus modius, aequusque sextarius, Salomone quoque parem super hoc sententiam proferente: pondus magnum et pusillum et mensurae duplices, inmunda sunt ante dominum utraque, et qui facit ea in adinuentionibus suis conpedietur. proinde non solum illo quo diximus, sed etiam hoc modo studendum est nobis, ut nec iniqua pondera in cordibus nostris nec in horreis conscientiae nostrae mensuras duplices habeamus, id est ne nobis ea quae ad districtionis regulam pertinent mollienda abundantiore remissionis indulgentia praesumentes eos, quibus uerbum domini praedicamus, districtioribus praeceptis et grauioribus quam ipsi sustinere possumus ponderibus obruamus: quod cum facimus, quid nisi duplici pondere atque mensura praeceptorum domini mercem frugemque uel adpendimus uel metimur? si enim aliter ea nobis, aliter nostris fratribus dispensemus, recte increpamur a domino, eo quod stateras dolosas ac mensuras duplices habeamus, secundum illam sententiam Salomonis qua dicitur abominatio est domino pondus duplex, et statera dolosa non est bonum in conspectu eius. hoc etiam modo reatum dolosi ponderis duplicisque mensurae euidenter incurrimus, si districtiora quaedam quam priuatim per nostras cellulas exercere consueuimus humanae laudis cupiditate coram fratribus ostentemus, abstinentiores scilicet et sanctiores apparere adfectantes humano conspectui quam diuino: qui morbus praecipue non modo uitandus, uerum etiam abominandus est nobis, sed interea a quaestione proposita paulo longius euagati ad eandem a qua discessimus reuertamur.
CHAPTER XXII. The answer on the way to keep control over abstinence.
Theonas: If we weigh everything that we do, by a reasonable judgment of the mind, and on the purity of our heart always consult not the opinions of other people but our own conscience, that interval for refreshment is sure not to interfere with our proper strictness, if only, as was said, our pure mind impartially considers the right limits of indulgence and abstinence, and fairly checks excess in either, and with real discrimination discerns whether the weight of the delicacies is a burden upon our spirits, or whether too much austerity in abstaining weighs down the other side, i.e., that of the body, and either depresses or raises that side which it sees to be raised or weighed down. For our Lord would have nothing done to His honour and glory without being tempered by judgment, for "the honour of a king loveth judgment," and therefore Solomon, the wisest of men, urges us not to let our judgment incline to either side, saying: "Honour God with thy righteous labours and offer to Him of the fruits of thy righteousness." For we have residing in our conscience an uncorrupt and true judge who sometimes, when all are wrong, is the only person not deceived as to the state of our purity. And so with all care and pains we should preserve a constant purpose in our circumspect heart for fear lest if the judgment of our discretion goes wrong, we may be fired with the desire for an ill-considered abstinence, or allured by the wish for an excessive relaxation, and so weigh the substance of our strength in the tongue of an unfair balance; but we should place in one of the scales our purity of soul, and in the other our bodily strength, and weigh them both in the true judgment of conscience, so that we may not perversely incline the scale of fairness to either side, either to undue strictness or to excessive relaxation, from the preponderating desire for one or the other, and so have this said to us by reason of excessive strictness or relaxation: "If thou offerest rightly, but dost not divide rightly, hast thou not sinned?" For those offerings of fasts, which we thoughtlessly extort by violently tearing our bowels, and fancy that we rightly offer to the Lord, these He execrates who "loves mercy and judgment," saying: "I the Lord love judgment, but I hate robbery in a burnt offering." Those also who take the main part of their offerings, i.e., their offices and actions, to benefit the flesh for their own use, but leave the remains of them and a tiny portion for the Lord, these the Divine Word thus condemns as fraudulent workmen: "Cursed is he that doeth the work of the Lord fraudulently." It is not then without reason that the Lord reproves him who thus deceives himself by unfair considerations, saying: "But vain are the children of men: the children of men are liars upon the balances that they may deceive." And therefore the blessed Apostle warns us to keep hold of the reins of discretion and not to be attracted by excess and swerve to either side, saying: "Your reasonable service." And the giver of the law similarly forbids the same thing, saying: "Let the balance be just and the weights equal, the bushel just and the sextarius equal," and Solomon also gives a like opinion on this matter: "Great and small weights and double measures are both unclean before the Lord, and one who uses them shall be hindered in his contrivances." Further not only in the way in which we have said, but also in this must we strive not to have unfair weights in our hearts, nor double measures in the storehouse of our conscience, i.e., not to overwhelm those, to whom we are to preach the word of the Lord, with precepts that are too strict and heavier than we ourselves can bear, while we take for granted that for ourselves those things which have to do with the rule of strictness are to be softened by a freer allowance of relaxation. For when we do this, what is it but to weigh and measure the goods and fruits of the Lord's commands in a double weight and measure? For if we dispense them in one way to ourselves and in another to our brethren, we are rightly blamed by the Lord because we have unfair balances and double measures, in accordance with the saying of Solomon which tells us that "A double weight is an abomination to the Lord, and a deceitful balance is not good in His sight." In this way also we plainly incur the guilt of using a deceitful weight and a double measure, if out of the desire for the praise of men, we make a show before the brethren of greater strictness than what we practice in private in our own cells, trying to appear more abstinent and holier in the sight of men than in the sight of God, an evil which we should not only avoid but actually loathe. But meanwhile as we have wandered some way from the question before us, let us return to the point from which we started.
XXIII. De refectionis tempore atque mensura.
Igitur praedictorum dierum ita est custodienda sollemnitas, ut corporis atque animae cultui prosit magis remissio indulta quam noceat, quia nec ullius festiuitatis gaudium aculeos carnis obtundere nec inmitis ille aduersarius dierum nouit reuerentia mitigari. ut ergo et diebus festis statuta consuetudinis sollemnitas conseruetur et saluberrimus parsimoniae modus minime transcendatur, sufficit ut indulgentiam remissionis eo usque progredi patiamur, ut cibus, qui hora diei nona fuerat capiendus, paulo citius id est sexta hora pro festiuitate temporis capiatur, ea ratione dumtaxat, ut escarum solitus modus uel qualitas non mutetur, ne puritas corporis uel integritas mentis abstinentia Quadragensimae conquisita Quinquagensimae remissione depereat nihilque nobis prosit obtinuisse ieiuniis, quod mox amitti cogat incauta saturitas, praesertim cum etiam hostis nostri non ignota uersutia tunc praecipue munitionem nostrae puritatis inpugnet, cum eius custodiam senserit sollemnitatis cuiusquam celebritate laxatam. quamobrem uigilantissime prouidendum est, ne umquam mentis nostrae uigor blandis seductionibus eneruetur neue ut supra iam dictum est castimoniae puritatem Quadragensimae continuo labore quaesitam Quinquagensimae requie ac securitate perdamus. et idcirco nulla penitus in ciborum qualitate uel modo admittatur adiectio, sed ab escis, quarum continentia diebus profestis integritatem pudicitiae tuebamur, etiam diebus celeberrimis similiter temperemus, ne laetitia festiuitatis perniciosissimam nobis carnalium incentiuorum suscitans pugnam uertatur in luctum illamque excellentiorem nobis quae gaudio incorruptionis exultat festiuitatem mentis eripiat et incipiamus post breuem carnalis laetitiae uanitatem amissam cordis pudicitiam longo paenitentiae maerore deflere. studendum quin immo est, ut non frustra ad nos illa propheticae adhortationis commonitio dirigatur: celebra Iuda festiuitates tuas, et redde uota tua. si enim continentiae iugitatem interiecta dierum sollemnitas non mutarit, spiritalibus feriis iugiter perfruemur, et ita nobis a seruili operatione cessantibus erit mensis ex mense, et sabbatum ex sabbato.
CHAPTER XXIII. Of the time and measure of refreshment.
So then we should keep the observance of the days mentioned in such a way that the relaxation allowed may be useful rather than harmful to the good of body and soul, because the joy of any festival cannot blunt the pricks of the flesh, nor can that fierce enemy of ours be pacified by regard for days. In order then that the observance of the customs appointed for festival seasons may be kept and that the most salutary rule of abstinence be not at all exceeded it is enough for us to allow the permitted relaxation to go so far, as for us out of regard for the festival season to take the food, which ought to be taken at the ninth hour, a little earlier; viz., at the sixth hour, but with this condition, that the regular allowance and character of the food be not altered, for fear lest the purity of body and uprightness of soul which has been gained by the abstinence of Lent be lost by the relaxation of Easter-tide, and it profit us nothing to have acquired by our fast what a careless satiety causes us presently to lose, especially as the well-known cunning of our enemy assaults the stronghold of our purity then chiefly when he sees that our guard over it is somewhat relaxed at the celebration of some festival. Wherefore we must most vigilantly look out that the vigour of our soul be never enervated by seductive flatteries, and we lose not the purity of our chastity, gained, as was said, by the continuous efforts of Lent, by the repose and carelessness of Eastertide. And therefore no addition at all should be made to the quality or the quantity of the food, but even on the highest festivals we should similarly abstain from those foods, by abstinence from which we preserve our uprightness on common days, that the joy of the festival may not excite in us a most deadly conflict of carnal desires, and so be turned to grief, and put an end to that most excellent festival of the heart, which exults in the joy of purity; and after a brief show of carnal joy we begin to mourn our lost purity of heart with a lasting sorrow of repentance. Moreover we should strive that this warning of the prophetic exhortation may not be uttered against us to no purpose: "Celebrate, O Judah, thy festivals, and pay thy vows." For if the occurrence of festival days does not interfere with the continuity of our abstinence, we shall continually enjoy spiritual festivals and so, when we cease from servile work, "there shall be month after month and Sabbath after Sabbath."
XXIIII. Interrogatio de diuersa obseruatione Quadragensimae.
Germanus: Quid causae est, ut sex ebdomadibus Quadragensima celebretur, licet in quibusdam prouinciis religionis forsitan propensior cura adiecisse ebdomadem etiam septimam uideatur, cum neuter numerus, die dominico sabbatoque subtracto, quadraginta dierum impleat summam? sex enim et triginta dies in ipsis ebdomadibus tantummodo concluduntur.
CHAPTER XXIV. A question on the different ways of keeping Lent.
Germanus: What is the reason why Lent is kept for six weeks, while in some countries a possibly more earnest care for religion seems to have added a seventh week as well, though neither number when you subtract Sunday and Saturday, gives the total of forty days? For only six and thirty days are included in these weeks.
XXV. Responsio, eo quod ad anni decimas Quadragensimae ieiunium referatur.
Theonas: Licet quorundam pia simplicitas huius rei amputet quaestionem, tamen, quia etiam illa, quae alius interrogatione indigna duxisset, scrupulosius perscrutantes integram obseruantiae nostrae ac mysterii ueritatem desideratis agnoscere, euidentissimam etiam huius rei percipite rationem, ut manifestius adprobetis nihil inrationabile nostros tradidisse maiores. lege Moysaica uniuerso populo generalis promulgata praeceptio est: decimas tuas et primitias offeres domino deo tuo. itaque qui substantiarum nostrarum omniumque fructuum decimas offerre praecipimur, multo magis necesse est ut ipsius quoque conuersationis nostrae et humani usus operumque nostrorum decimas offeramus, quae profecto in supputatione Quadragensimae euidenter inplentur. omnium enim dierum numerus, quibus reuolutus in orbem annus includitur, triginta sex semis dierum numero decimatur. in septem uero ebdomadibus, si dies dominici et sabbata subtrahantur, quinque et triginta supersunt dies ieiuniis deputati. sed adiecta illa uigiliarum die, qua usque in gallorum cantum inlucescente dominica ieiunium sabbati protelatur, non solum sex et triginta dierum numerus adimpletur, uerum etiam pro decimis quinque dierum, qui residui uidebantur, si illud quod superadiectum est noctis spatium conputetur, plenitudini totius summae nihil deerit.
CHAPTER XXV. The answer to the effect that the fast of Lent has reference to the tithe of the year.
Theonas: Although the pious simplicity of some folks would put aside a question on this subject, yet because you are more scrupulous in your examination of those things which another would consider unworthy to be asked about, and want to know the whole truth of this observance of ours and the secret of it, you shall have a very clear reason for this also, that you may still more plainly be convinced that our predecessors taught nothing unreasonable. By the law of Moses the command propounded to all the people generally was this: "Thou shalt offer to the Lord thy God thy tithes and firstfruits." And so, while we are commanded to offer tithes of our substance and all our fruits, it is much more needful for us to offer tithes of our life and ordinary employments and actions, which certainly is clearly arranged for in the calculation of Lent. For the tithe of the number of all the days included in the revolving circle of the year is thirty-six days and a half. But in seven weeks, if Sundays and Saturdays are subtracted, there remain thirty-five days assigned for fasting. But by the addition of Easter Eve when the Saturday's fast is prolonged to the cock-crowing at the dawn of Easter Day, not only is the number of thirty-six days made up, but in regard to the tithe of the five days which seemed to be over, if the bit of the night which was added be taken into account nothing will be wanting to the whole sum.
XXVI. Quomodo etiam primitias nostras domino debeamus offerre.
Quid uero de primitiis dicam, quas ab omnibus qui Christo fideliter famulantur cotidie certum est exhiberi? nam cum expergefacti a somno et quasi rediuiua post soporem alacritate surgentes, priusquam motum sensus ullius corde concipiant uel memoriam aut curam rei familiaris admittant, cogitationum suarum ortus atque principia diuinis consecrant holocaustis, quid nisi primitias uere suorum fructuum per summum pontificem Iesum Christum pro usu uitae huius et imagine cotidianae resurrectionis exsoluunt? quique etiam a somno exciti hostiam iubilationis suae deo similiter offerentes primo linguae suae motu ipsum inuocant, ipsius nomen laudesque concelebrant, atque ad canendos ei hymnos prima labiorum claustra reserantes immolant deo sui oris officia: cui etiam pari deferunt modo prima manuum suarum gressuumque libamina, cum e cubilibus consurgentes in oratione consistunt, et priusquam in propriis causis membrorum suorum fungantur officio, nihil sibi de ministerio eorum ante decerpunt, sed ad ipsius honorem promouent gressum atque in eius laudatione defigunt, et ita cunctorum motuum suorum primitias protensione manuum, incuruatione genuum et totius corporis prostratione persoluunt. illud enim quod decantatur in psalmo alias inplere non possumus: praeueni in maturitate, et clamaui, et: praeuenerunt oculi mei ad te diluculum: ut meditarer eloquia tua, et: mane oratio mea praeueniet te, nisi ut post quietem somni in hanc lucem ut supra diximus uelut e tenebris ac morte reuocati de uniuersis officiis mentis et corporis nihil omnino in nostris praesumere necessitatibus audeamus. nullus namque est alius quem aut propheta praeuenerit matutinus aut nos praeuenire similiter debeamus, nisi aut nosmet ipsos, id est occupationes nostras et adfectus curasque mortales, sine quibus esse non possumus, aut suggestiones subtilissimas inimici, quas nobis adhuc quiescentibus ac sopore demersis per phantasias inanium somniorum inferre conatur, quibus nos mox euigilaturos occupet et inuoluat, ut primitiarum nostrarum opima deflorans primus ipse decerpat. quamobrem omni nobis cautione curandum est, si tamen uim praedicti uersiculi opere uolumus adimplere, ut ita primos matutinarum cogitationum ortus sollers uigilantia tueatur, ne quid ex eis festina praesumptio liuentis adtaminet inimici nostrasque primitias tamquam uiles iam atque communes a domino faciat reprobari. qui si praeuentus a nobis peruigili mentis circumspectione non fuerit, anticipationis nequissimae consuetudinem non deponens cotidie nos fraudibus suis praeuenire non desinet. et idcirco si placitas et acceptabiles deo primitias ex fructibus mentis nostrae optamus offerre, non mediocrem sollicitudinem debemus inpendere, ut omnes nostri corporis sensus matutinis praecipue horis tamquam sacrosancta domini holocausta in omnibus inlibata atque intacta seruemus. quod deuotionis genus multi etiam saecularium summa cautione custodiunt, qui ante lucem uel diluculo consurgentes nequaquam familiaribus ac necessariis mundi huius actibus inplicantur, priusquam cunctorum actuum suorum operationumque primitias ad ecclesiam concurrentes diuino studeant sacrare conspectui.
CHAPTER XXVI. How we ought also to offer our firstfruits to the Lord.
But what shall I say of the firstfruits which surely are given daily by all who serve Christ faithfully? For when men waking from sleep and arising with renewed activity after their rest, before they take in any impulse or thought in their heart, or admit any recollection or consideration of business consecrate their first and earliest thoughts as divine offerings, what are they doing indeed but rendering the firstfruits of their produce through the High Priest Jesus Christ for the enjoyment of this life and a figure of the daily resurrection? And also when roused from sleep in the same way they offer to God a sacrifice of joy and invoke Him with the first motion of their tongue and celebrate His name and praise, and throwing open, the first thing, the door of their lips to sing hymns to Him they offer to God the offices of their mouth; and to Him also in the same way they bring the earliest offerings of their hands and steps, when they rise from bed and stand in prayer and before they use the services of their limbs for their own purposes, take to themselves nothing of their services, but for His glory advance their steps, and set them in His praise and so render the first fruits of all their movements by stretching forth the hands, bending the knees, and prostrating the whole body. For in no other way can we fulfil that of which we sing in the Psalm: "I prevented the dawning of the day and cried;" and: "Mine eyes to Thee have prevented the morning that I might meditate on Thy words;" and: "In the morning shall my prayer prevent Thee;" unless after our rest in sleep when, as we said above, we are restored as from darkness and death to this light, we have the courage not to begin by taking any of all the services both of mind and body for our own uses. For there is no other morning which the prophet "prevented," or which in the same way we ought to prevent, except either ourselves, i.e., our occupations and feelings and earthly cares, without which we cannot exist—or the most subtle suggestions of the adversary, which he tries to suggest to us, while still resting and overcome with sleep, by the phantoms of vain dreams, with which, when we presently awake, he will fill our minds and occupy us, that he may be the first to seize and carry off the spoils of our firstfruits. Wherefore we must take the utmost care (if we want to fulfil in act the meaning of the above quoted verse) that an anxious watchfulness takes regard of our first and earliest morning thoughts, that they may not be defiled beforehand being hastily taken possession of by our jealous adversary, and thus he may make our firstfruits to be rejected by the Lord as worthless and common. And if he is not prevented by us with watchful circumspection of mind, he will not lay aside his habit of miserably anticipating us nor cease day after day to prevent us by his wiles. And therefore if we want to offer firstfruits that are acceptable and well pleasing to God of the fruits of our mind, we ought to spend no ordinary care to keep all the senses of our body, especially during the hours of the morning, as a sacred holocaust to the Lord pure and undefiled in all things. And this kind of devotion many even of those who live in the world observe with the utmost care, as they rise before it is light or very early, and do not at all mix in the ordinary and necessary business of this world before hastening to church and striving to consecrate in the sight of God the firstfruits of all their actions and doings.
XXVII. Cur diuerso dierum numero Quadragensima a plerisque obseruetur.
Porro quod dicitis diuerso more, id est sex uel septem ebdomadibus per nonnullas prouincias Quadragensimam celebrari, una ratio idemque ieiuniorum modus diuersa ebdomadarum obseruatione concluditur. hi enim sex ebdomadarum sibi obseruantiam praefixerunt, qui putant die quoque sabbati ieiunandum. sex ergo in ebdomade ieiunia persoluunt, quae eosdem sex et triginta dies sexies reuoluta consummant. una ergo, quemadmodum diximus, ratio idemque est ieiuniorum modus, licet in ebdomadarum numero discrepare uideantur.
CHAPTER XXVII. Why Lent is kept by very many with a different number of days.
Further, as for what you say; viz., that in some countries Lent is kept in different ways, i.e., for six or seven weeks, it is but one system and the same manner of the fast that is preserved by the different observance of the weeks. For those who think one ought to fast also on the Saturday, have determined on the observance of six weeks. They therefore fast for six days out of the seven, and this being six times repeated makes up the six and thirty days. It is therefore, as we said, but one system and the same manner of the fast, although there seems to be a difference in the number of the weeks.
XXVIII. Quare uocetur Quadragensima, cum XXXVI diebus tantummodo ieiunetur.
Sed profecto cum rationem huius rei humana oblitterasset incuria, tempus hoc, quo anniuersariae ut dictum est decimae deo triginta sex semis ieiuniis offeruntur, Quadragensimae nomen accepit, quod fortasse uel propter hoc uisum sit hoc uocabulo debere censeri, quod Moyses uel Helias uel ipse dominus noster Iesus Christus quadraginta diebus ieiunasse traduntur. ad cuius numeri sacramentum illi quoque quadraginta anni, quibus Israhel est in solitudine commoratus, et quadraginta similiter mansiones, quibus eam mystice pertransisse describitur, non incongrue coaptantur. an fortasse ipsa decimatio recte quasi ab usu telonei Quadragensimae nomen acceperit? ita enim illa publica uulgo uocatur exactio, ex qua tanta lucri portio regis commodis deputatur, quantum et nobis a rege omnium saeculorum pro usu uitae nostrae legitimum Quadragensimae uectigal exigitur. sane licet ad propositam non pertineat quaestionem, tamen quia se obtulit narrationis occasio, nec hoc quidem praetereundum puto, quod frequentissime seniores nostri idcirco illis diebus maxime inpugnari omne monachorum genus antiqua inimicae gentis consuetudine testabantur et ad transmigrandum de suis sedibus acrius perurgueri, eo quod secundum illam similitudinem, qua tunc Aegyptii filios Israhel uiolentis adflictionibus opprimebant, nunc quoque uerum Israhel, id est monachorum plebem intellectualis Aegyptii duris ac lutulentis operibus incuruare conentur, ne per amicam deo quietem terram Aegyptiam deserentes ad heremum uirtutum salubriter transeamus, ita ut aduersum nos Pharao infremens dicat: otiosi sunt, et ideo uociferantur dicentes: eamus et sacrificemus domino deo nostro, opprimantur laboribus, et solliciti sint in operibus suis, et non sint solliciti in uerbis uanis. nam utique uanitas eorum sanctum domini sacrificium, quod non nisi in heremo liberi cordis offertur, summam adstruit uanitatem: abominatio enim peccatori religio.
CHAPTER XXVIII. Why it is called Quadragesima, when the fast is only kept for thirty-six days.
But further, as man's carelessness dropped out of sight the reason of this, this season when, as was said, the tithes of the year are offered by fasts for thirty-six days and a half, was called Quadragesima, a name which perhaps they thought ought to be given to it for this reason; viz., that it is said that Moses and Elijah and our Lord Jesus Christ Himself fasted for forty days. To the mystery of which number are not unsuitably applied those forty years in which Israel dwelt in the wilderness, and in like manner the forty stations which they are said to have passed through with a mystic meaning. Or perhaps the tithe was properly given the name of Quadragesima from the use of the custom-house. For so that state tax is commonly called, from which the same proportion of the increment is assigned for the king's use, as the legal tribute of Quadragesima, which is required of us by the King of all the ages for the use of our life. At any rate, although this has nothing to do with the question raised, yet I think that I ought not to omit the fact that very often our elders used to testify that especially on these days the whole body of monks was attacked according to the ancient custom of the people opposed to them, and was more vehemently urged to forsake their homes, for this reason, because in accordance with this figure, whereby the Egyptians formerly oppressed the children of Israel with grievous afflictions, so now also the spiritual Egyptians try to bow down the true Israel, i.e., the monastic folk, with hard and vile tasks, lest by means of that peace which is dear to God, we should forsake the land of Egypt, and for our good cross to the desert of virtues, so that Pharaoh rages against us and says: "They are idle and therefore they cry saying: Let us go and sacrifice to the Lord our God. Let them be oppressed with labours, and be harassed in their works, and they shall not be harassed by vain words." For certainly their folly imagines that the holy sacrifice of the Lord, which is only offered in the desert of a pure heart, is the height of folly, for "religion is an abomination to a sinner."
XXVIIII. Quod perfecti supergrediantur legem Quadragensimae.
Hac igitur Quadragensimae lege qui iustus ac perfectus est non tenetur nec exigui huius canonis subiectione contentus est, quem profecto illis, qui per totum anni spatium deliciis uel negotiis saecularibus inplicantur, ecclesiarum principes statuerunt, ut uel hac legali quodammodo necessitate constricti his saltim diebus uacare domino cogerentur ac dierum uitae suae, quos totos quasi fructus quosdam fuerant uoraturi, uel decimas domino dedicarent. ceterum iusti, quibus lex non est posita quique spiritalibus officiis non exiguam illam id est decimam partem, sed totum uitae suae tempus inpendunt, quia liberi sunt a decimarum legalium functione, idcirco si eos superueniens honesta et sancta necessitas coartarit, audent istam stationem ieiunii absque ulla disceptatione laxare. non enim ab eis decimarum exiguitas mutilatur, qui omnia sua domino secum pariter obtulerunt. quod profecto absque summo fraudis reatu facere ille non poterit, qui nihil uoluntarie offerens deo inexcusabiliter soluere decimas suas legis necessitate conpellitur. quapropter liquido conprobatur perfectum esse non posse famulum legis, qui uel illa quae prohibentur cauet uel illa quae praecipiuntur exsequitur, sed illos uere esse perfectos, qui etiam his quae a lege concessa sunt non utuntur. et hac ratione cum de Moysaica lege dicatur: nihil enim ad perfectum perduxit lex, nonnullos sanctorum in ueteri testamento perfectos legimus extitisse, quia transcendentes legis imperium sub euangelica perfectione uixerunt, scientes quod iustis lex non est posita, sed iniustis et non subditis, impiis et peccatoribus, sceleratis et contaminatis, et cetera.
CHAPTER XXIX. How those who are perfect go beyond the fixed rule of Lent.
By this law of Lent then the man who is upright and perfect is not restrained nor is he content with merely submitting to that paltry rule which the heads of the church have established for those who all the year round are involved in pleasure or business, that they may be bound by this legal requirement and forced at any rate during these days to find time for the Lord, and dedicate to Him the tithe of the days of their life, all of which they would have consumed as their profits. But the righteous, for whom the law is not appointed, and who devote to spiritual duties not a small part; viz., the tenth, but the whole time of their life, because they are free from the burden of tithes according to law, for this reason, if any worthy and pious occasion happening to them constrains them, are ready to relax their station fast without any hesitation. For in their case it is no paltry tithe that is diminished, as they offer all that they have to the Lord equally with themselves. And this certainly a man could not do without being guilty of a grievous wrong, who, offering nothing of his own free will to God, is forced to pay his tithes by the stern compulsion of the law which takes no excuse. Wherefore it is clearly established that the servant of the law cannot be perfect, who only shuns those things which are forbidden and does those things which are commanded, but that those are really perfect who do not take advantage even of those things which the law allows. And in this way, though it is said of the Mosaic law that "the law brought nothing to perfection," we read that some of the saints in the Old Testament were perfect because they went beyond the commands of the law and lived under the perfection of the Gospel: "Knowing that the law is not appointed for the righteous but for the unrighteous and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the wicked and defiled, etc."
XXX. De causa et initio Quadragensimae.
Sciendum sane hanc obseruantiam Quadragensimae, quamdiu ecclesiae illius primitiuae perfectio inuiolata permansit, penitus non fuisse. non enim praecepti huius necessitate nec quasi legali sanctione constricti artissimis ieiuniorum terminis claudebantur, qui totum anni spatium aequali ieiunio concludebant. uerum cum ab illa apostolica deuotione desciscens cotidie credentium multitudo opibus suis incubare coepisset nec eas usui cunctorum fidelium secundum apostolorum instituta diuideret, sed priuatim inpendiis suis consulens non seruare tantum sed etiam augere contenderet, Annaniae et Sapphirae exemplum non contenta sectari, id uniuersis tunc sacerdotibus placuit, ut homines curis saecularibus inligatos et paene ut ita dixerim continentiae uel conpunctionis ignaros canonica ieiuniorum ad sanctum opus indictione reuocarent et uelut legalium decimarum necessitate conpellerent, quae utique infirmis prodesse possit, perfectis praeiudicare non possit, qui sub gratia euangelii constituti uoluntaria legem deuotione transcendunt, ut ad illam apostolicae sententiae peruenire beatitudinem possint: peccatum enim in uobis non dominabitur: non enim estis sub lege sed sub gratia, uere enim dominationem in illo non potest exercere peccatum, qui fideliter sub gratiae libertate consistit.
CHAPTER XXX. Of the origin and beginning of Lent.
Howbeit you should know that as long as the primitive church retained its perfection unbroken, this observance of Lent did not exist. For they were not bound by the requirements of this order, or by any legal enactments, nor confined in the very narrow limits of the fast, as the fast embraced equally the whole year round. But when the multitude of believers began day by day to decline from that apostolic fervour, and to look after their own wealth, and not to portion it out for the good of all the faithful in accordance with the arrangement of the apostles, but having an eye to their own private expenses, tried not only to keep it but actually to increase it, not content with following the example of Ananias and Sapphira, then it seemed good to all the priests that men who were hampered by worldly cares, and almost ignorant, if I may say so, of abstinence and contrition, should be recalled to the pious duty by a fast canonically enjoined, and be constrained by the necessity of paying the legal tithes, as this certainly would be good for the weak brethren and could not do any harm to the perfect who were living under the grace of the gospel and by their voluntary devotion going beyond the law, so as to succeed in attaining to the blessedness which the Apostle speaks of: "For sin shall not have dominion over you; for ye are not under the law but under grace." For of a truth sin cannot exercise dominion over one who lives faithfully under the liberty of grace.
XXXI. Interrogatio, quemadmodum intellegi debeat quod apostolus ait: peccatum in uobis non dominabitur.
Germanus: Quia non potest fallax haec apostoli esse sententia, quae securitatem non solum monachis, sed etiam omnibus Christianis generaliter repromittit, nimium nobis uidetur obscura. cum enim cunctos qui euangelio credunt a iugo et dominatione peccati liberos atque alienos esse pronuntiet, quomodo paene in omnibus baptizatis uiget dominatio peccatorum secundum sententiam domini qua ait: omnis qui facit peccatum seruus est peccati?
CHAPTER XXXI. A question, how we ought to understand the Apostle's words: "Sin shall not have dominion over you."
Germanus: Because this saying of the Apostle, which promises freedom from care not only to monks but to all Christians in general, cannot lead us wrong, it seems to us somewhat obscure. For whereas he maintains that all those who believe the gospel are at liberty and free from the yoke and dominion of sin, how is it that the dominion of sin holds vigorous sway over almost all the baptized, in accordance with the Lord's words, where He says: "Every one that doeth sin is the servant of sin"?
XXXII. Responsio de differentia gratiae et legalium praeceptorum.
Theonas: Quaestionem nobis rursus inmodicam inquisitio uestra conmouet. cuius uim licet sciam ab inexpertis nec tradi posse nec percipi, tamen in quantum potero uerbis absoluere et breuiter expedire temptabo, si modo intellectus uester ea quae dicimus etiam operibus subsequatur. quaecumque enim non per doctrinam, sed per experientiam cognoscuntur, sicut tradi ab inexperto nequeunt, ita nec mente concipi uel teneri ab eo qui non simili studio fuerit atque institutione fundatus. et idcirco necessarium reor, ut primum diligentius inquiramus quodnam sit propositum uel uoluntas legis uel quae gratiae disciplina atque perfectio, ut consequenter ex his seu dominationem peccati seu expulsionem eius possimus agnoscere. itaque lex principaliter iubet expeti copulam nuptiarum dicens: beatus qui habet semen in Sion et domesticos in Hierusalem, et: male dicta sterilis quae non peperit. e contrario gratia ad incorruptionis perpetuae puritatem et castimoniam nos beatae uirginitatis inuitat beatae, inquiens, steriles, et ubera quae non lactauerunt, et: qui non oderit patrem et matrem et uxorem, non potest meus esse discipulus, et illud apostoli: reliquum est ut et qui habent uxores tamquam non habentes sint. lex dicit: decimas tuas et primitias non tardabis offerre, gratia: si uis perfectus esse, uade uende omnia quae habes et da pauperibus. lex talionem conuiciorum et iniuriarum non prohibet ultionem dicens: oculum pro oculo, dentem pro dente. gratia congeminatione iniuriarum uel caedis quae fuerit inrogata uestram patientiam uult probari et ad duplicis dispendii tolerantiam paratos esse nos praecipit, qui te percusserit, inquiens, in dextera maxilla tua, praebe illi alteram, et illi qui uult tecum in iudicio contendere et tunicam tuam tollere, remitte ei et pallium, illa inimicos odio habendos, haec ita diligendos esse decernit, ut pro ipsis etiam deo semper censeat supplicandum.
CHAPTER XXXII. The answer on the difference between grace and the commands of the law.
Theonas: Your inquiry once more raises before us a question of no small extent. The explanation of which though I know that it cannot be taught to or understood by the inexperienced, yet as far as I can, I will try to set forth in words and briefly to explain, if only your minds will follow up and act upon what we say. For whatever is known not by teaching but by experience, just as it cannot be taught by one without experience, so neither can it be grasped or taken in by the mind of one who has not laid the foundation by a similar study and training. And therefore I think it necessary for us first to inquire somewhat carefully what is the purpose or meaning of the law, and what is the system and perfection of grace, that from this we may succeed in understanding the dominion of sin and how to drive it out. And so the law chiefly commands men to seek the bonds of wedlock, saying: "Blessed is he that hath seed in Sion and an household in Jerusalem;" and: "Cursed is the barren that hath not borne." On the other hand grace invites us to the purity of perpetual chastity, and the undefiled state of blessed virginity, saying: "Blessed are the barren, and the breasts which have not given suck;" and: "he that hateth not father and mother and wife cannot be my disciple;" and this of the Apostle: "It remaineth that they that have wives be as though they had them not." The law says: "Thou shalt not delay to offer thy tithes and firstfruits;" grace says: "If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell all that thou hast and give to the poor:" The law forbids not retaliation for wrongs and vengeance for injuries, saying: "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." Grace would have our patience proved by the injuries and blows offered to us being redoubled, and bids us be ready to endure twice as much damage; saying: "If a man strike thee on one cheek, offer him the other also; and to him who will contend with thee at the law and take away thy coat, give him thy cloak also." The one decrees that we should hate our enemies, the other that we should love them so that it holds that even for them we ought always to pray to God.
XXXIII. De eo, quod leniora sint euangelii praecepta quam legis.
Quisquis igitur hoc euangelicae perfectionis culmen ascenderit, iste profecto supra omnem legem tantarum uirtutum meritis sublimatus et uniuersa quae per Moysen praecepta sunt quasi parua despiciens tantum sub gratia saluatoris se esse cognoscit, cuius adiutorio se ad illum sublimissimum statum intellegit peruenisse. non ergo dominatur in eo peccatum, quia caritas dei quae diffusa est in cordibus nostris per spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis omnem alterius cuiusquam rei excludit adfectum, nec potest aut uetita concupiscere aut imperata contemnere, cuius totum studium totumque desiderium diuino amori semper intentum usque adeo uilium rerum oblectatione non capitur, ut etiam his quae concessa sunt non utatur. in lege autem, in qua coniugiorum iura seruantur, quamuis cohibita luxuriae euagatio uni tantum feminae mancipetur, tamen nequaquam possunt carnalis concupiscentiae aculei non uigere, et difficile est ut ignis, cui etiam studiose pabula suggeruntur, ita praefixis terminis includatur, ut non etiam extra euagatus amburat quidquid adtigerit. cui etiamsi sua illa ita semper occurrat obiectio, ut exaestuare extrinsecus non sinatur, tamen etiam dum cohibetur incendit, quia uoluntas ipsa culpabilis est et ad uelocissimos adulteriorum raptatur excessus consuetudo concubitus. ceterum quos gratia saluatoris sancto incorruptionis amore flammauerit, ita omnes carnalium desideriorum spinas dominicae caritatis igne consumunt, ut nec tepens fauilla uitiorum refrigerium integritatis inminuat. legis ergo famuli licitorum usu ad inlicita prolabuntur, gratiae participes, dum licita contemnunt, inlicita non nouerunt. sicut autem uiuit in coniugii amatore peccatum, ita etiam in eo qui decimas suas ac primitias tantum redhibere contentus est. necesse est enim eum, dum tardat aut neglegit, aut in qualitate earum aut quantitate aut in cotidiana distributione peccare. qui enim iubetur ea quae sua sunt infatigabiliter indigentibus ministrare, quamlibet ea summa fide ac deuotione dispenset, tamen difficile est ut non laqueos peccatorum frequenter incurrat. in illis uero qui consilium domini non spreuerunt, sed omnem substantiam suam pauperibus praerogantes sumpta cruce sua largitorem gratiae subsequuntur, peccatum non potest dominari. non enim eum sacratas iam Christo opes et quasi alienas pia distributione pecunias dispensantem infidelis seruandi uictus cura mordebit nec elemosynae hilaritatem abiget maesta cunctatio, quia quod semel totum obtulit deo, id iam alienum sine propriae necessitatis recordatione aut angusti uictus timore dispergit, qui se certus est cum ad desideratam peruenerit nuditatem multo magis a deo quam uolucrem caeli esse pascendum. e contrario is qui substantiam retinens mundialem aut decimas fructuum suorum atque primitias aut partem pecuniarum constrictus legis antiquae sanctione distribuit, licet peccatorum suorum ignem maxime hoc elemosynae rore restinguat, tamen, quantauis opes suas magnanimitate dispenset, inpossibile est ut se ad plenum eruat a dominatione peccati, nisi forte per gratiam saluatoris cum re etiam ipsum adfectum deposuerit possidendi. pari modo non potest non cruento peccati imperio famulari, quicumque oculum pro oculo, dentem pro dente ex praecepto legis eruere aut odio habere inimicum suum mauult, quia necesse est eum, dum talionis uicissitudine ulcisci suam optat iniuriam, dum contra inimicos odii amaritudinem seruat, furoris atque irae perturbatione semper accendi. quicumque uero sub euangelicae gratiae inluminatione uersatur, ac malum non resistendo superans sed ferendo dexteram percutienti maxillam etiam alteram praebere uoluntarius non moratur, uolenti aduersum se de tunica litigium conmouere remittit et pallium, quique diligit inimicos suos et orat pro calumniantibus sibi, hic peccati reppulit iugum ac uincla disrupit. non enim uiuit sub lege, quae non interimit seminaria peccatorum (unde non inmerito de ipsa beatus apostolus reprobatio, inquit, fit praecedentis mandati propter infirmitatem eius et inutilitatem: nihil enim ad perfectum perduxit lex, et dominus per prophetam et dedi, inquit, eis praecepta non bona, et iustificationes, in quibus non uiuent in eis), sed sub gratia, quae non ramos tantum nequitiae amputat, sed ipsas penitus radices noxiae uoluntatis euellit.
CHAPTER XXXIII. Of the fact that the precepts of the gospel are milder than those of the law.
Whoever therefore climbs this height of evangelical perfection, is at once raised by the merits of such virtue above every law, and disregarding as trivial all that is commanded by Moses, recognizes that he is only subject to the grace of the Saviour, by whose aid he knows that he attained to that most exalted condition. Therefore sin has no dominion over him, "because the love of God, which is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given to us," shuts out all care for everything else, and can neither desire what is forbidden, or disregard what is commanded, as its whole aim and all its desire is ever fixed on divine love, and to such an extent is it not caught by the delights of worthless things, that it actually does not take advantage of those things which are permitted. But under the law, where lawful marriages are observed, although the rovings of wantonness are restrained, and bound down to one woman alone, yet the pricks of carnal lust cannot help being vigorous; and it is hard for the fire, for which fuel is expressly supplied, to be thus shut in within prearranged limits, so as not to spread further and burn up anything it touches. As even if this objection occurs to it that it is not allowed to be kindled beyond these limits, yet even while it is kept in check, it is on fire because the will itself is in fault, and its habit of carnal intercourse hurries it into too speedy excesses of adultery. But those whom the grace of the Saviour has fired with the holy love of chastity, so consume all the thorns of carnal desires in the fire of the Lord's love, that no dying embers of sin interfere with the coldness of their purity. The servants of the law then from the use of lawful things fall away to unlawful; the partakers of grace while they disregard lawful things know nothing of unlawful ones. But as sin is alive in one who loves marriage, so is it also in one who is satisfied with merely paying his tithes and firstfruits. For, while he is dawdling or careless, he is sure to sin in regard to either their quality or quantity, or the daily distribution of them. For as he is commanded unweariedly to minister to those in want of what is his, although he may dispense it with the fullest faith and devotion, yet it is hard for him not to fall often into the snares of sin. But over those who have not set at naught the counsel of the Lord, but who, disposing of all their property to the poor, take up their cross and follow the bestower of grace, sin can have no dominion. For no faithless anxiety for getting food will annoy him who piously distributes and disperses his wealth already consecrated to Christ and no longer regarded as his own; nor will any grudging hesitation take away from the cheerfulness of his almsgiving, because without any thought of his own needs or fear of his own food running short he is distributing what has once for all been completely offered to God, and is no longer regarded as his own, as he is sure that when he has succeeded in stripping himself as he desires, he will be fed by God much more than the birds of the air. On the other hand he who retains his goods of this world, or, bound by the rules of the old law, distributes the tithe of his produce, and his firstfruits, or a portion of his income, although he may to a considerable degree quench the fire of his sins by this dew of almsgiving, yet, however generously he gives away his wealth, it is impossible for him altogether to rid himself of the dominion of sin, unless perhaps by the grace of the Saviour, together with his substance he gets rid of all love of possessing. In the same way he cannot fail to be subject to the bloody sway of sin, whoever chooses to pull out, as the law commands, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, or to hate his enemy, for while he desires by retaliation in exchange to avenge an injury done to himself, and while he cherishes bitter hatred against an enemy, he is sure always to be inflamed with the passion of anger and rage. But whoever lives under the light of the grace of the gospel, and overcomes evil by not resisting it, but by bearing it, and does not hesitate of his own free will to give to one who smites his right cheek, the other also, and to one who wants to raise a lawsuit against him for his coat, gives his cloak also, and who loves his enemies, and prays for those who slander him, this man has broken the yoke of sin and burst its chains. For he is not living under the law, which does not destroy the seeds of sin (whence not without reason the Apostle says of it: "There is a setting aside of the former commandment because of the weakness and unprofitableness thereof: for the law brought nothing to perfection;" and the Lord says by the prophet: "And I gave them commands that were not good, and ordinances, whereby they could not live", but under grace which does not merely lop off the boughs of wickedness, but actually tears up the very roots of an evil will.
XXXIIII. Quemadmodum quis probetur esse sub gratia.
Quisquis ergo perfectionem euangelicae studuerit tenere doctrinae, hic sub gratia constitutus peccati dominatione non premitur: hoc est enim esse sub gratia, quae a gratia mandantur inplere. quicumque uero perfectionis euangelicae plenitudini subiectus esse noluerit, non ignoret se, quamuis baptizatus sibi uideatur ac monachus, non esse sub gratia, sed legis adhuc uinculis praepeditum peccati pondere praegrauari. propositum namque est eius, qui omnes a quibus receptus fuerit gratia adoptionis adsumit, non destruere, sed superaedificare, nec euacuare, sed adimplere Moysaicas sanctiones. quod nonnulli penitus ignorantes et consiliorum atque exhortationum Christi magnificentiam neglegentes ita praesumptiuae libertatis securitate soluuntur, ut non solum Christi praecepta tamquam ardua non adtingant, uerum etiam illa ipsa, quae illis incipientibus paruulisque Moysaica lege mandata sunt, uelut antiquata contemnant, illud quod apostolus execratur noxia libertate dicentes: peccauimus, quia non sumus sub lege sed sub gratia, qui ergo nec sub gratia est, quia nequaquam dominicae doctrinae culmen ascendit, nec sub lege, quia etiam ipsa illa paruula legis mandata non suscepit, hic duplici peccatorum oppressus imperio ob hoc solum gratiam Christi percepisse se credit, ut per noxiam libertatem ab eo fieret alienus, in illud incidens quod apostolus Petrus ne incurramus denuntiat: quasi liberi, inquit, agite, et non quasi uelamentum habentes malitiae libertatem. beatus quoque apostolus Paulus uos enim, inquit, in libertatem uocati estis, fratres, id est ut absoluti sitis a dominatione peccati, tantum ne libertatem in occasionem carnis detis, id est frustrationem legalium praeceptorum credatis esse licentiam uitiorum. haec uero libertas quia nusquam nisi ibi sit tantum ubi dominus commoratur, Paulus apostolus docet dominus, inquiens, spiritus est: ubi autem spiritus domini, ibi libertas. quapropter ignoro utrum hunc beati apostoli sensum, sicut hi qui experti sunt sapiunt, exprimere atque elucidare potuerim unum scio apertissime illum etiam sine expositione cuiusquam omnibus reserari, qui πρακτικήν, id est actualem perfecte tenuerunt disciplinam. non enim laborabunt, ut quod iam operando didicerunt intellegant disputando.
CHAPTER XXXIV. How a man can be shown to be under grace.
Whoever then strives to reach the perfection of evangelical teaching, this man living under grace is not oppressed by the dominion of sin, for to be under grace is to do those things which grace commands. But whoever will not submit himself to the complete requirements of evangelical perfection, must not remain ignorant that, although he seems to be baptized and to be a monk, yet he is not under grace, but is still shackled by the chains of the law, and weighed down by the burden of sin. For it is the aim of Him, who by the grace of adoption accepts all those by whom He has been received, not to destroy but to build upon, not to abolish but to fulfil the Mosaic requirements. But some knowing nothing about this, and disregarding the splendid counsels and exhortations of Christ, are so emancipated by the carelessness of a freedom too hastily assumed, that they not only fail to carry out the commands of Christ as if they were too hard, but actually scorn as antiquated, the commands given to them as beginners and children by the law of Moses, saying in this dangerous freedom of theirs that which the Apostle execrates: "We have sinned, because we are not under the law but under grace." He then who is neither under grace, because he has never climbed the heights of the Lord's teaching, nor under the law, because he has not accepted even those small commands of the law, this man, ground down beneath a twofold rule of sin, fancies that he has received the grace of Christ, simply and solely for this, that by this dangerous liberty of his he may make himself none of His, and falls into that state, which the Apostle Peter warns us to avoid, saying: "Act as free, and not having your liberty as a cloak of wickedness." The blessed Apostle Paul also says: "For ye, brethren, were called to liberty," i.e., that ye might be free from the dominion of sin, "only use not your liberty for an occasion of the flesh," i.e., believe that the doing away with the commands of the law is a licence to sin. But this liberty, the Apostle Paul teaches us is nowhere but where the Lord is dwelling, for he says: "The Lord is the Spirit, but where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty." Wherefore I know not whether I could express and explain the meaning of the blessed Apostle, as those know how, who have experience; one thing I do know, that it is very clearly revealed even without anyone's explanation to all those who have perfectly acquired πρακτική, i.e., practical training. For they will need no effort to understand in discussion what they have already learnt by practice.
XXXV. Interrogatio, cur interdum propensius ieiunantes carnalibus incentiuis acrius urgueamur.
Germanus: Obscurissimam quaestionem et multis etiam ut putamus incognitam apertissime reuelasti. unde ut hoc quoque profectui nostro adicias deprecamur, ut cur interdum etiam propensius ieiunantibus nobis et exhaustis atque defectis uehementiores pugnae corporis excitentur, diligenter edisseras. nam plerumque etiam expergefacti e somno cum deprehenderimus nos sordidi liquoris contagium pertulisse, ita deicimur conscientia, ut ne ad ipsam quidem consurgere orationem fiducialiter audeamus.
CHAPTER XXXV. A question, why sometimes when we are fasting more strictly than usual, we are troubled by carnal desires more keenly than usual.
Germanus: You have very clearly explained a most difficult question, and one which, as we think, is unknown to many. Wherefore we pray you to add this also for our good, and carefully to expound why sometimes when we are fasting more strictly than usual, and are exhausted and worn out, severer bodily struggles are excited. For often on waking from sleep, when we have discovered that we have been defiled we are so dejected in heart that we do not even venture faithfully to rise even for prayer.
XXXVI. Responsio, quod haec quaestio futurae conlationi debeat reseruari.
Theonas: Studium quidem uestrum, quo perfectionis uiam non transitorie, sed plene atque perfecte desideratis adtingere, infatigabiliter nos disputationi huic prouocat inhaerere. nec enim de exteriore castimonia et circumcisione manifesta, sed de illa quae in occulto est diligenter inquiritis, scientes in hac uisibili carnis continentia perfectionis plenitudinem non inesse, quae haberi uel per necessitatem uel per hypocrisin etiam ab infidelibus potest, sed in illa cordis uoluntaria et inuisibili puritate, quam beatus apostolus ita praedicat: non enim qui in manifesto, Iudaeus, neque quae in manifesto in carne, est circumcisio, sed qui in occulto, Iudaeus, et circumcisio cordis spiritu non littera, cuius laus non ex hominibus sed ex deo est, qui solus scilicet cordium secreta rimatur. tamen quia satisfieri desiderio uestro ad plenum non potest (breue enim quod superest spatium noctis ad indagandam hanc abstrusissimam non sufficit quaestionem), congruum reor ut interim differatur. sensim namque haec et corde ab omni cogitationum strepitu penitus absoluto ut a nobis proferri, ita uestris debent mentibus intimari, quae sicut propter communem purificationem oportet inquiri, ita nisi ab eo qui donum integritatis expertus est tradi adsignarique non possunt. non enim quaeritur quid inanium argumenta uerborum, sed quid interna conscientiae fides et maior uis ueritatis inculcet. et idcirco de emundationis huius scientia atque doctrina nec proferri aliquid nisi ab experto nec transfundi quicquam potest nisi in cupidissimum et ualde sollicitum ueritatis ipsius amatorem, qui non eam uacuis nudisque sermonibus sciscitando, sed totis animi uiribus adnitendo optet adtingere, scilicet non studio loquacitatis infructuosae, sed desiderio purificationis internae.
CHAPTER XXXVI. The answer, telling that this question should be reserved for a future Conference.
Theonas: Your zeal indeed, whereby you desire to reach the way of perfection, not for a moment only but fully and perfectly, urges us to continue this discussion unweariedly. For you are anxiously inquiring not about external chastity or outward circumcision, but about that which is secret, as you know that complete perfection does not consist in this visible continence of the flesh which can be attained either by constraint, or by hypocrisy even by unbelievers, but in that voluntary and invisible purity of heart, which the blessed Apostle describes as follows: "For he is not a Jew which is so outwardly, nor is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh, but he is a Jew which is one inwardly, and the circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit not in the letter, whose praise is not of men but of God," who alone searches the secrets of the heart. But because it is not possible for your wish to be fully satisfied (as the short space of the night that is left is not enough for the investigation of this most difficult question,) I think it well to postpone it for a while. For these matters, as they should be propounded by us quietly and with an heart entirely free from all bustling thoughts, so should they be received into your minds; for just as the inquiry ought to be undertaken for the sake of our common purity, so they cannot be learnt or acquired by one who is without the gift of uprightness. For we do not ask what arguments of empty words, but what the inward faith of the conscience and the greater force of truth can persuade. And therefore with regard to the knowledge and teaching of this purification nothing can be brought forward except by one who has had experience of it, nor can anything be committed except to one who is a most eager and very earnest lover of the truth itself, who does not hope to attain it by asking questions with mere vain words, but by striving with all his might and main, with no wish for useless chattering but with the desire to purify himself internally.
Latin text: Conlationes XXIIII, ed. M. Petschenig, Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 13, Vienna, 1886, checked against the scans; without the critical apparatus. · English translation by E. C. S. Gibson († 1924), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd series, vol. 11, New York, 1894. Gibson left Conferences XII and XXII untranslated. Public-domain text in France (art. L123-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code). Transcription and revision: Abbatia Sancti Petri de Curte. Report an error