Abbatia
Sancti Petri
de Curte

John Cassian, The Conferences

Conference XXIII. Abbot Theonas: of sinlessness

Conlatio abbatis Theonae tertia. De anamarteto.XXIII. The Third Conference of Abbot Theonas. On Sinlessness.

1

I. Disputatio abbatis Theonae de eo quod apostolus dicit: non enim quod uolo facio bonum.

Reuersa igitur luce cum ad perscrutandam abyssum apostolicae quaestionis summa a nobis senex conpelleretur instantia, ita effatus est. testimonia quibus probare conamini apostolum Paulum non ex sua, sed pro peccatorum dixisse persona: non enim quod uolo facio bonum, sed quod odi malum, hoc ago, uel illud: si autem quod nolo, hoc facio, iam non ego operor illud sed quod habitat in me peccatum, uel quod sequitur: condelector enim legi dei secundum interiorem hominem, uideo autem aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati quae est in membris meis, e contrario euidenter ostendunt peccatorum personae haec non posse omnimodis conuenire, sed ad solos quae dicta sunt adtinere perfectos et eorum tantum qui apostolorum merita subsequuntur congruere castitati. ceterum quo pacto hoc peccatorum personae poterit conuenire quod dicitur: non enim quod uolo facio bonum, sed quod odi malum, hoc ago? sed ne illud quidem: si autem quod nolo, hoc facio, iam non ego operor illud sed quod habitat in me peccatum. quis enim delinquentium nolens se adulteriis fornicationibusque contaminet? quis inuitus proximo tendat insidias? quis ineuitabili necessitate cogatur, ut falso testimonio hominem opprimat furtoue decipiat, ut alterius spolia concupiscat uel sanguinem fundat? quin immo, ut scriptum est, humanum genus diligenter intentum est ad nequitiam a iuuentute sua. in tantum enim omnes uitiorum amore flagrantes desiderant inplere quae cupiunt, ut etiam peruigili cura oportunitatem conmittendi sceleris aucupantes etiam timeant ne libidinum satietate tardius potiantur, et de ignominia sua et criminum cumulo gloriantes secundum sententiam obiurgantis apostoli laudem sibi quandam de confusione conquirant. quos etiam Hieremias propheta non solum non nolentes nec cum requie cordis et corporis flagitiorum crimina perpetrare, uerum etiam in tantum eos adserit laboriosis conatibus ut ad effectum eorum perueniant desudare, ut a letali scelerum adpetitu nec obsistentibus eis arduis difficultatibus reuocentur, dicens: ut inique agerent, laborauerunt. illud quoque quis dixerit peccatoribus conuenire: itaque ego ipse mente seruio legi dei, carne autem legi peccati, quos nec mente nec carne deo seruire manifestum est? aut quemadmodum hi qui corpore peccant mente seruiant deo, cum uitiorum fomitem caro ex corde concipiat et ipse auctor utriusque naturae fontem atque originem peccatorum ex eo pronuntiet emanare de corde, inquiens, procedunt cogitationes malae, adulteria, fornicationes, furta, falsa testimonia et cetera? quamobrem euidenter ostenditur nullo modo hoc de peccatorum intellegi posse personis, qui non solum non oderunt, sed etiam diligunt mala et in tantum deo nec mente nec carne deseruiunt, ut ante delinquant mente quam carne, et priusquam corporis expleant uoluptatem, praeueniantur mentis suae cogitationumque peccato.

CHAPTER I. Discourse of Abbot Theonas on the Apostle's words: "For I do not the good which I would."

At the return of light therefore, as the old man was forced by our intense urgency to investigate the depths of the Apostle's subject, he spoke as follows: As for the passages by which you try to prove that the Apostle Paul spoke not in his own person but in that of sinners: "For I do not the good that I would, but the evil which I hate, that I do;" or this: "But if I do that which I would not, it is no longer I that do it but sin that dwelleth in me;" or what follows: "For I delight in the law of God after the inner man, but I see another law in my members opposing the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members;" these passages on the contrary plainly show that they cannot possibly fit the person of sinners, but that what is said can only apply to those that are perfect, and that it only suits the chastity of those who follow the good example of the Apostles. Else how could these words apply to the person of sinners: "For I do not the good which I would, but the evil which I hate that I do"? or even this: "But if I do what I would not it is no longer I that do it but sin that dwelleth in me"? For what sinner defiles himself unwillingly by adulteries and fornication? Who against his will prepares plots against his neighbour? Who is driven by unavoidable necessity to oppress a man by false witness or cheat him by theft, or covet the goods of another or shed his blood? Nay rather, as Scripture says, "Mankind is diligently inclined to wickedness from his youth." For to such an extent are all inflamed by the love of sin and desire to carry out what they like, that they actually look out with watchful care for an opportunity of committing wickedness and are afraid of being too slow to enjoy their lusts, and glory in their shame and the mass of their crimes, as the Apostle says in censure, and seek credit for themselves out of their own confusion, of whom also the prophet Jeremiah maintains that they commit their flagitious crimes not only not unwillingly nor with ease of heart and body, but with laborious efforts to such an extent that they come to toil to carry them out, so that they are prevented even by the hindrance of arduous difficulty from their deadly quest of sin; as he says: "They have laboured to do wickedly." Who also will say that this applies to sinners: "And so with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin," as it is plain that they serve God neither with the mind nor the flesh? Or how can those who sin with the body serve God with the mind, when the flesh receives the incitement to sin from the heart, and the Creator of either nature Himself declares that the fount and spring of sin flows from the latter, saying: "From the heart proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, etc." Wherefore it is clearly shown that this cannot in any way be taken of the person of sinners, who not only do not hate, but actually love what is evil and are so far from serving God with either the mind or the flesh that they sin with the mind before they do with the flesh, and before they carry out the pleasures of the body are overcome by sin in their mind and thoughts.

2

II. Multa bona apostolum consummasse.

Superest igitur ut uirtutem sensus ex intimo dicentis metiamur adfectu, et quid beatus apostolus dixerit bonum quidue conparatione eius pronuntiauerit malum non nuda significatione uerborum, sed eodem quo ille discutiamus intuitu, intellectum quoque eius secundum dignitatem pronuntiantis ac meritum perscrutemur. tunc enim sententias deo inspirante prolatas secundum propositum ac uoluntatem eius conprehendere poterimus, cum eorum a quibus promulgatae sunt statum ac meritum perpendentes non uerbo, sed experimentis parem induerimus adfectum, pro cuius qualitate sine dubio uel concipiuntur uniuersi sensus uel sententiae proferuntur. quamobrem quid sit principaliter bonum quod apostolus non potuerit perficere cum uellet, diligentius indagemus. multa enim nouimus bona, quae beatum apostolum omnesque illius meriti uiros et habuisse per naturam et adquisisse per gratiam negare non possumus. est enim bona castitas, laudabilis continentia, miranda prudentia, larga humanitas, circumspecta sobrietas, modesta temperantia, pia misericordia, sancta iustitia: quae omnia in apostolo Paulo eiusdemque consortibus ita plena atque perfecta fuisse non dubium est, ut uirtutum magisterio potius quam uerborum ab eis religio doceretur. quid quod iugi ecclesiarum omnium cura ac peruigili sollicitudine semper exusti sunt? quantum hoc misericordiae bonum, quanta perfectio est, pro scandalizantibus uri, cum infirmantibus infirmari! cum ergo tantis apostolus abundauerit bonis, quid illud sit boni, cuius perfectione caruerit, non poterimus agnoscere, nisi in illum quo ipse locutus est profecerimus adfectum. omnes itaque quas diximus eum habuisse uirtutes quamuis uelut gemmae splendidissimae atque pretiosae sint, tamen si praeclaro illi atque praecipuo margarito, quod ille euangelicus negotiator inquirens uniuersis quae possidet uenditis conparare desiderat, conferantur, ita earum meritum reuilescit atque contemnitur, ut eis sine cunctatione distractis unius tantum boni possessio locupletet bonorum innumerabilium uenditorem.

CHAPTER II. How the Apostle completed many good actions.

It remains therefore for us to measure its meaning and drift from the inmost feelings of the speaker, and to discuss what the blessed Apostle called good, and what he pronounced by comparison evil, not by the bare meaning of the words, but with the same insight which he showed, and to investigate his meaning with due regard to the worth and goodness of the speaker. For then we shall be able to understand the words, which were uttered by God's inspiration, in accordance with his purpose and wish, when we weigh the position and character of those by whom they were spoken, and are ourselves clothed with the same feelings (not in words but by experience), in accordance with the character of which most certainly all the thoughts are conceived and opinions uttered. Wherefore let us carefully consider what was in the main that good which the Apostle could not do when he would. For we know that there are many good things which we cannot deny that the blessed Apostle and all men as good as he either have by nature, or acquire by grace. For chastity is good, continence is praiseworthy, prudence is to be admired, kindness is liberal, sobriety is careful, temperance is modest, pity is kind, justice is holy: all of which we cannot doubt existed fully and in perfection in the Apostle Paul and his companions, so that they taught religion by the lesson of their virtues rather than their words. What if they were always consumed with the constant care of all the churches and watchful anxiety? How great a good is this pity, what perfection it is to burn for them that are offended, to be weak with the weak! If then the Apostle abounded with such good things, we cannot recognize what that good was, in the perfection of which the Apostle was lacking, unless we have advanced to that state of mind in which he was speaking. And so all those virtues which we say that he possessed, though they are like most splendid and precious gems, yet when they are compared with that most beautiful and unique pearl which the merchant in the gospel sought and wanted to acquire by selling all that he possessed, so does their value seem poor and trifling, so that if they are without hesitation got rid of, the possession of one good thing alone will enrich the man who sells countless good things.

3

III. Quid sit uere bonum, quod apostolus semet ipsum perficere non posse testatur.

Quid ergo est unum quod illis tantis tamque innumeris bonis tam inconparabiliter praeponatur, ut spretis abiectisque omnibus solum debeat possideri? nimirum illa pars optima, cuius magnificentiam ac perpetuitatem cum relicto susceptionis atque humanitatis officio Maria praelegisset, ita praedicatur a domino: Martha Martha, sollicita es et turbaris circa multa: paucis uero opus est aut etiam uno. Maria bonam partem elegit, quae non auferetur ab ea. una ergo est theoria, id est contemplatio dei, cuius merito omnia iustificationum merita, uniuersa uirtutum studia postponuntur. et illa quidem omnia, quae in apostolo Paulo fulsisse praediximus, non solum bona et utilia, uerum etiam magna atque praeclara sunt, sed sicut uerbi gratia stagni metallum, quod alicuius utilitatis et gratiae putabatur, fit argenti contemplatione uilissimum et rursum auri conparatione meritum euanescit argenti, aurum quoque ipsum gemmarum conlatione contemnitur et ipsarum nihilominus quamuis insignium multitudo gemmarum unius margariti uincitur claritate, ita illa omnia merita sanctitatis quamuis non solum ad praesens bona et utilia sint, uerum etiam donum aeternitatis adquirant, tamen si diuinae contemplationis meritis conferantur, uilia atque ut ita dixerim uendibilia censebuntur. et ut hanc eandem conparationem etiam scripturarum confirmet auctoritas, nonne de uniuersis quae a deo creata sunt generaliter scriptura pronuntiat dicens: et ecce omnia quae fecit deus, bona ualde, et iterum: uniuersa quae fecit deus bona in tempore suo? haec igitur quae in praesenti non solum bona simpliciter, uerum etiam cum additamento ualde bona pronuntiantur (sunt enim re uera in hoc mundo commorantibus nobis aut ad usum uitae aut ad corporis medicinam aut ad aliquam causam ignotae nobis utilitatis adcommoda uel certe in eo etiam ualde bona, quod faciunt nos inuisibilia dei a creatura mundi per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspicere, sempiternam quoque uirtutem eius ac diuinitatem ex tanta tamque ordinata molitione fabricae mundialis et omnium quae in ea sunt subsistentia contemplari), haec tamen omnia nec boni nomen tenebunt, si futuro illi saeculo conparentur, ubi nulla bonorum inmutatio, nulla est uerae beatitudinis formidanda corruptio. cuius mundi ita beatitudo describitur: erit lux lunae sicut lux solis, et lux solis septempliciter sicut lux septem dierum. magna igitur haec et praeclara intuitu atque mirifica si futuris ex fide promissionibus conferantur, continuo uanitas apparebunt dicente Dauid: omnia sicut uestimentum ueterescent. et sicut opertorium mutabis ea, et mutabuntur: tu autem idem ipse es, et anni tui non deficient, ergo quia nihil est per semet ipsum stabile, nihil inmutabile, nihil bonum nisi deitas sola, omnis uero creatura, ut beatitudinem aeternitatis uel inmutabilitatis obtineant, non hoc per suam naturam, sed per creatoris sui participationem et gratiam consequuntur, tenere meritum bonitatis creatori suo conlata non possunt.

CHAPTER III. What is really the good which the Apostle testifies that he could not perform.

What then is that one thing which is so incomparably above those great and innumerable good things, that, while they are all scorned and rejected, it alone should be acquired? Doubtless it is that truly good part, the grand and lasting character of which is thus described by the Lord, when Mary disregarded the duties of hospitality and courtesy and chose it: "Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things: but there is but need of but few things or even of one only. Mary hath chosen the good part which shall not be taken away from her." Contemplation then, i.e., meditation on God, is the one thing, the value of which all the merits of our righteous acts, all our aims at virtue, come short of. And all those things which we said existed in the Apostle Paul, were not only good and useful, but even great and splendid. But as, for example, the metal of alloy which is considered of some use and worth, becomes worthless when silver is taken into account, and again the value of silver disappears in comparison with gold, and gold itself is disregarded when compared with precious stones, and yet a quantity of precious stones however splendid are outdone by the brightness of a single pearl, so all those merits of holiness, although they are not merely good and useful for the present life, but also secure the gift of eternity, yet if they are compared with the merit of Divine contemplation, will be considered trifling and so to speak, fit to be sold. And to support this illustration by the authority of Scripture, does not Scripture declare of all things in general which were created by God, and say: "And behold everything that God had made was very good;" and again: "And things that God hath made are all good in their season"? These things then which in the present time are termed not simply and solely good, but emphatically "very good" (for they are really convenient for us while living in this world, either for purposes of life, or for remedies for the body, or by reason of some unknown usefulness, or else they are indeed "very good," because they enable us "to see the invisible things of God from the creatures of the world, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead," from this great and orderly arrangement of the fabric of the world; and to contemplate them from the existence of everything in it), yet none of these things will keep the name of good if they are regarded in the light of that world to come, where no variation of good things, and no loss of true blessedness need be feared. The bliss of which world is thus described: "The light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold as the light of seven days." These things then which are great and wondrous to be gazed on, and marvellous, will at once appear as vanity if they are compared with the future promises from faith; as David says: "They all shall wax old as a garment, and as a vesture shall Thou change them, and they shall be changed. But Thou art the same, and Thy years shall not fail." Because then there is nothing of itself enduring, nothing unchangeable, nothing good but Deity alone, while every creature, to obtain the blessing of eternity and immutability, aims at this not by its own nature but by participation of its Creator, and His grace, they cannot maintain their character for goodness when compared with their Creator.

4

IIII. Bonitatem humanam atque iustitiam non esse bonam, si diuinae bonitati ac iustitiae conferatur.

Quodsi etiam manifestioribus adhuc testimoniis huius sententiae rationem uoluerimus adstruere, nonne cum multa pronuntiari bona in euangelio legerimus, et arborem bonam et thesaurum bonum et bonum hominem et bonum seruum, quia non potest, inquit, arbor bona malos fructus facere et bonus homo de bono thesauro cordis sui profert bona, et: euge, serue bone et fidelis, et utique hos omnes secundum se bonos esse non dubium sit, si respiciamus ad bonitatem dei, nullus eorum pronuntiabitur bonus dicente domino: nemo bonus nisi solus deus? cuius intuitu etiam ipsi apostoli, qui electionis merito bonitatem generis humani multis excesserant modis, mali esse dicuntur, domino ad eos ita loquente: si ergo uos, cum sitis mali, nostis bona dare filiis uestris, quanto magis pater uester qui in caelis est dabit bona petentibus se. denique sicut bonitas nostra supernae bonitatis intuitu in malitiam uertitur, ita etiam iustitia nostra diuinae conlata iustitiae panno menstruatae similis deputatur dicente Esaia propheta: sicut pannus menstruatae uniuersae iustitiae nostrae. et ut aliquid adhuc euidentius inferamus, legis quoque ipsius praecepta uitalia, quae dicitur data per angelos in manu mediatoris, et de qua idem apostolus: itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum et iustum et bonum, si perfectioni euangelicae conferantur, minime bona diuino pronuntiantur oraculo. ait enim: et dedi eis praecepta non bona, et iustitias, in quibus non uiuent in eis. apostolus quoque ita noui lumine testamenti gloriam legis adfirmat obtundi, ut euangelici conparatione fulgoris nec glorificandam esse proclamet dicens: nam nec gloriosum est id quod glorificatum est propter excellentem gloriam. quam conparationem etiam in parte contraria, id est in peccatorum meritis conpensandis scriptura conseruat, ut eos qui multo minus peccauerunt impiorum conlatione iustificet dicens: iustificata est Sodoma ex te, et iterum: quid enim peccauit soror tua Sodoma? et: iustificauit animam suam auersatrix Israhel, conparatione praeuaricatricis Iudae. ita igitur et uniuersarum merita uirtutum, quae superius conprehendi, cum per se bona atque pretiosa sint, tamen theoreticae claritatis conparatione fuscantur. multum etenim sanctos quamuis bonorum operum, terrenis tamen studiis occupatos a contemplatione sublimis illius boni retrahunt ac retardant.

CHAPTER IV. How man's goodness and righteousness are not good if compared with the goodness and righteousness of God.

But if we want also to establish the force of this opinion by still clearer proofs, is it not the case that while we read of many things as called good in the gospel, as a good tree, and good treasure, and a good man, and a good servant, for He says: "A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit;" and: "a good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things;" and: "Well done, good and faithful servant;" and certainly there can be no doubt that none of these are good in themselves, yet if we take into consideration the goodness of God, none of them will be called good, as the Lord says: "None is good save God alone"? In whose sight even the apostles themselves, who in the excellence of their calling in many ways went beyond the goodness of mankind, are said to be evil, as the Lord thus speaks to them: "If ye then being evil know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask Him." Finally as our goodness turns to badness in the eyes of the Highest so also our righteousness when set against the Divine righteousness is considered like a menstruous cloth, as Isaiah the prophet says: "All your righteousness is like a menstruous cloth." And to produce something still plainer, even the vital precepts of the law itself, which are said to have been "given by angels by the the hand of a mediator," and of which the same Apostle says: "So the law indeed is holy and the commandment is holy and just and good," when they are compared with the perfection of the gospel are pronounced anything but good by the Divine oracle: for He says: "And I gave them precepts that were not good, and ordinances whereby they should not live in them." The Apostle also affirms that the glory of the law is so dimmed by the light of the New Testament that he declares that in comparison with the splendour of the gospel it is not to be considered glorious, saying: "For even that which was glorious was not glorified by reason of the glory that excelleth." And Scripture keeps up this comparison on the other side also, i.e., in weighing the merits of sinners, so that in comparison with the wicked it justifies those who have sinned less, saying: "Sodom is justified above thee;" and again: "For what hath thy sister Sodom sinned?" and: "The rebellious Israel hath justified her soul in comparison of the treacherous Judah." So then the merits of all the virtues, which I enumerated above, though in themselves they are good and precious, yet become dim in comparison of the brightness of contemplation. For they greatly hinder and retard the saints who are taken up with earthly aims even at good works, from the contemplation of that sublime good.

5

V. Neminem summo illi bono intentum esse iugiter posse.

Nam quis eripiens inopem de manu fortiorum eius et egenum et pauperem a diripientibus eum, quis conterens molas iniquorum et de medio dentium eorum rapinas extorquens in ipso intercessionis opere diuinae gloriam maiestatis quieta mente suspiciat? quis alimoniam pauperibus subministrans aut aduenientium turbas beniuola humanitate suscipiens in eo temporis puncto, quo pro necessitatibus fratrum sollicita mente distenditur, inmensitatem supernae beatitudinis speculetur, et cum praesentis uitae angoribus curisque concutitur, futuri saeculi statum eleuato e terrenis contagiis corde prospiciat? unde beatus Dauid solum hoc bonum homini esse definiens deo iugiter inhaerere desiderat dicens: mihi autem adhaerere deo bonum est: ponere in domino spem meam. quod etiam Ecclesiastes a nemine sanctorum sine querella perfici posse pronuntians quia non est, inquit, iustus homo in terra, qui faciat bonum, et non peccabit. quis enim umquam quamuis praecipuus omnium iustorum atque sanctorum huius corporis uinculis conligatus summum hoc bonum ita possidere potuisse credendus est, ut numquam a diuina contemplatione discedens ne paruo quidem tempore ab eo qui solus bonus est terrenis cogitationibus putetur abstractus? qui umquam nullam cibi, nullam indumenti aliarumue carnalium rerum gesserit curam, numquam de fratrum susceptione, de loci conmutatione, de cellulae extructione sollicitus aut opem aliquam humani concupierit adiumenti aut inopiae sterilitate uexatus illam sententiam dominicae increpationis incurrerit: ne solliciti sitis animae uestrae quid manducetis, neque corpori uestro quid induamini? denique illum ipsum apostolum Paulum, qui omnium sanctorum laborem passionum numerositate transcenderat, nequaquam hoc inplere potuisse confidenter adstruimus, ipso in Actibus apostolorum discipulis adtestante: ipsi scitis quoniam ad ea quae mihi opus erant et his qui mecum sunt ministrauerunt manus istae, uel cum Thessalonicensibus scribens in labore et fatigatione nocte et die operatum se fuisse testatur. quibus licet magna eidem meritorum stipendia pararentur, tamen mens eius quamuis sancta atque sublimis non poterat non ab illa caelesti theoria intentione terreni operis aliquando diuelli. denique cum se tantis actualibus ditari fructibus cerneret et e contrario theoriae bonum corde pensaret ac uelut in una lance tantorum laborum profectum, in altera delectationem diuinae contemplationis adpenderet, diu examine pectoris sui quodammodo castigato, dum illum hinc laborum stipendia inmensa delectant, illinc desiderium unitatis et inseparabilis Christi societatis etiam ad resolutionem carnis inuitat, anxius tandem proclamat et dicit: quid eligam ignoro. coartor autem e duobus, desiderium habens dissolui et cum Christo esse, multo enim melius: permanere autem in carne magis necessarium propter uos. cum igitur multis modis boni huius excellentiam cunctis etiam praedicationis suae fructibus praetulisset, tamen caritatis, sine qua nemo dominum promeretur, contemplatione submittitur ac propter illos, quibus adhuc lac uelut nutricula uberibus euangelicis inmulgebat, diuulsionem a Christo sibi quidem noxiam sed ceteris necessariam non recusat. etenim ad electionem huius potissimum rei illa nimia pietatis uirtute conpellitur, qua pro salute fratrum suorum, si esset possibile, etiam ultimum anathematis malum optat se incurrere. optabam enim, inquit, ipse ego anathema esse a Christo pro fratribus meis, qui sunt cognati secundum carnem, qui sunt Israhelitae, hoc est: uellem ego non solum temporalibus, uerum etiam perpetuis addici poenis, dummodo omnes si fieri posset homines Christi consortio fruerentur: certus etenim sum utiliorem Christo et mihi omnium salutem esse quam meam. bonum ergo hoc summum, id est dei conspectu frui et Christo iugiter inhaerere ut perfecte apostolus posset adipisci, dissolui optat hoc corpore, quod caducum et multis fragilitatis suae necessitatibus inpeditum non potest a Christi consortio non auelli. inpossibile est enim etiam menti, quae tam crebris distenditur curis, tam uariis, tam molestis angoribus praepeditur, diuino frui semper intuitu, quod enim tam pertinax sanctorum studium, quod tam arduum potest esse propositum, cui non aliquando ille uersutus insidiator inludat? quis ita solitudinis secreta sectatus est et uniuersorum mortalium consortia declinauit, ut numquam cogitationibus superfluis laberetur et intuitu rerum uel occupatione actuum terrenorum ab illa quae uere sola et bona est dei contemplatione decideret? quis tantum spiritus umquam potuit retinere feruorem, ut non interdum lubricis cogitationibus ab ipsa quoque orationis intentione translatus repente de caelestibus ad terrena conrueret? quis nostrum, ut cetera peruagationum tempora praetermittam, non illo etiam momento, quo deo supplicans ad sublimia erigit mentem, quodam stupore conlapsus etiam per id uel inuitus offendat, per quod sperabat ueniam delictorum? quis, inquam, tam exertus ac uigilans est, ut dum psalmum deo canit numquam ab scripturae sensu eius animus abducatur? quis tam familiaris deo tamque coniunctus qui apostolicum illud imperium, quo sine intermissione orare nos praecipit, uel uno die se gaudeat exsecutum? quae licet omnia nonnullis, qui sunt crassioribus uitiis inuoluti, leuia atque a peccato paene aliena uideantur, scientibus tamen perfectionis bonum etiam minimarum rerum multitudo grauissima est.

CHAPTER V. How no one can be continually intent upon that highest good.

For who, when "delivering the poor from the hand of them that are too strong for him, and the needy and the poor from them that strip him," who when "breaking the jaws of the wicked and snatching their prey from between their teeth," can with a calm mind regard the glory of the Divine Majesty during the actual work of intervention? Who when ministering support to the poor, or when receiving with benevolent kindness the crowds that come to him, can at the very moment when he is with anxious mind perplexed for the wants of his brethren, contemplate the vastness of the bliss on high, and while he is shaken by the troubles and cares of the present life look forward to the state of the world to come with an heart raised above the stains of earth? Whence the blessed David when laying down that this alone is good for man, longs to cling constantly to God, and says: "It is good for me to cling to God, and to put my hope in the Lord." And Ecclesiastes also declares that this cannot be done without fault by any of the saints, and says: "For there is not a righteous man upon earth, that doeth good and sinneth not." For who, even if he be the chief of all righteous and holy men, can we ever think could, while bound in the chains of this life, so acquire this chief good, as never to cease from divine contemplation, or be thought to be drawn away by earthly thoughts even for a short time from Him Who alone is good? Who ever takes no care for food, none for clothing or other carnal things, or when anxious about receiving the brethren, or change of place, or building his cell, has never desired the aid of man's assistance, nor when harassed by scarcity and want has incurred this sentence of reproof from the Lord: "Be not anxious for your life what ye shall eat, nor for your body what ye shall put on"? Further we confidently assert that even the Apostle Paul himself who surpassed in the number of his sufferings the toils of all the saints, could not possibly fulfil this, as he himself testifies to the disciples in the Acts of the Apostles: "Ye yourselves know that these hands have ministered to my needs, and to the needs of those who were with me," or when in writing in the Thessalonians he testifies that he "worked in labour and weariness night and day." And although for this there were great rewards for his merits prepared, yet his mind, however holy and sublime it might be, could not help being sometimes drawn away from that heavenly contemplation by its attention to earthly labours. Further, when he saw himself enriched with such practical fruits, and on the other hand considered in his heart the good of meditation, and weighed as it were in one scale the profit of all these labours and in the other the delights of divine contemplation, when for a long time he had corrected the balance in his breast, while the vast rewards for his labours delighted him on one side, and on the other the desire for unity with and the inseparable companionship of Christ inclined him to depart this life, at last in his perplexity he cries out and says: "What I shall choose I know not. For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart and to be with Christ, for it were much better: but to abide in the flesh is more necessary for your sakes." Though then in many ways he preferred this excellent good to all the fruits of his preaching, yet he submits himself in consideration of love, without which none can gain the Lord; and for their sakes, whom hitherto he had soothed with milk as nourishment from the breasts of the gospel, does not refuse to be parted from Christ, which is bad for himself though useful for others. For he is driven to choose this the rather by that excessive goodness of his whereby for the salvation of his brethren he is ready, were it possible, to incur even the last evil of an Anathema. "For I could wish," he says, "that I myself were Anathema from Christ for my brethren's sake, who are my kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites," i.e., I could wish to be subject not only to temporal, but even to perpetual punishment, if only all men, were it possible, might enjoy the fellowship of Christ: for I am sure that the salvation of all would be better for Christ and for me than my own. That then the Apostle might perfectly gain this chief good, i.e., to enjoy the vision of God and to be joined continually to Christ, he was ready to be parted from this body, which as it is feeble and hindered by the many requirements of its frailties cannot help separating from union with Christ: for it is impossible for the mind, that is harassed by such frequent cares, and hampered by such various and tiresome troubles, always to enjoy the Divine vision. For what aim of the saints can be so persistent, what purpose can be so high that that crafty plotter does not sometimes destroy it? Who has frequented the recesses of the desert and shunned intercourse with all men in such a way that he never trips by unnecessary thoughts, and by looking on things or being occupied in earthly actions falls away from that contemplation of God, which truly alone is good? Who ever could preserve such fervour of spirit as not sometimes to pass by roving thoughts from his attention to prayer, and fall away suddenly from heavenly to earthly things? Which of us (to pass over other times of wandering) even at the very moment when he raises his soul in prayer to God on high, does not fall into a sort of stupor, and even against his will offend by that very thing from which he hoped for pardon of his sins? Who, I ask, is so alert and vigilant as never, while he is singing a Psalm to God, to allow his mind to wander from the meaning of Scripture? Who is so intimate with and closely joined to God, as to congratulate himself on having carried out for a single day that rule of the Apostle's, whereby he bids us pray without ceasing? And though all these things may seem to some, who are involved in grosser sins, to be trivial and altogether foreign to sin, yet to those who know the value of perfection a quantity even of very small matters becomes most serious.

6

VI. Quod lippis similes sint hi qui se credunt esse sine peccato.

Velut si in aliquam magnam domum multis sarcinis, instrumentis, uasculis inpeditam unum integra uisuum acie perspicacem, alterum cui oculorum lumen obtuderit lippitudo pariter ponamus ingressos, nonne cum ille, cui ad uidenda omnia hebens obsistit obtutus, nihil illic aliud esse confirmet nisi armaria, lectos, scamna, praesepia et quidquid non tam oculis speculantis quam manibus palpantis occurrerit, e contra hic, qui clarissimo luminum sidere etiam occulta rimatus est, multa illic minutissima et quae uix possint etiam numero conprehendi inesse proclamet, quae si aliquando in unum cumulum congregentur, paucorum quae ille palpauerat magnitudinem numerositate conpensent aut etiam forte transcendant? ita igitur etiam sancti atque ut ita dicamus uidentes, quibus summum perfectionis est studium, etiam illa, quae uelut tenebrosus animi nostri non intuetur aspectus, in semet ipsis sagaciter deprehendunt acerrimeque condemnant, usque adeo ut qui, sicut nostrae uidetur incuriae, ne tenui quidem peccati naeuo candorem uelut niuei corporis fuscauerunt, multis sibi maculis uideantur aspargi, si non dicam uanae cogitationis inprobitas in atria mentis inrepserit, sed uel psalmi qui dicendus est recordatio orationis tempore intentionem supplicantis auerterit. si enim, inquiunt, cum a quolibet sublimi homine non dicam pro uita ac salute nostra, sed etiam pro alicuius lucri conmodo supplicamus, totam in eum carnis et mentis aciem defigentes de nutu eius trepida expectatione pendemus, non mediocriter formidantes ne quod forte ineptum aut incongruum uerbum misericordiam audientis auertat, tum deinde si nobis in foro ac iudicum saecularium tribunalibus constitutis, adsistente etiam e contra aduersario, in media persecutione atque conflictu tussis, excreatus, risus, oscitatio, somnus obrepserit, quanta in perniciem nostram uigilantissimus inimicus seueritatem iudicis conmouebit inuidia: quanto magis, cum illi occultorum omnium cognitori pro inminenti perpetuae mortis periculo supplicamus, praesertim cum e diuerso callidus seductor pariter et criminator adsistat, intenta atque sollicita oratione iudicantis pietas inploranda est! nec iniuste non solum leui peccato, sed etiam grauissimo crimine inpietatis adstringetur, qui precem deo fundens subito a conspectu eius quasi ab oculis non uidentis nec audientis cogitationis inprobae uanitatem secutus abscedat. illi autem, qui oculos cordis sui contegunt crasso uelamine uitiorum ac secundum sententiam saluatoris uidentes non uident et audientes non audiunt neque intellegunt, uix in recessibus pectoris sui etiam illa quae magna et capitalia sunt crimina contemplantur, nullas autem cogitationum subreptiones, sed neque illos in se lubricos occultosque pruritus, qui mentem tenui atque subtili suggestione conpungunt, nec captiuitates animae suae possunt purgatis obtutibus intueri, sed inuerecundis semper cogitationibus euagantes nec dolere norunt, cum ab illa contemplatione quae singularis est distrahuntur, nec habent quod se doleant amisisse, quippe qui mentem suam ingruentibus ut libitum est cogitationibus expandentes nihil habent propositum, quod principaliter teneant uel quod omnimodis concupiscant.

CHAPTER VI. How those who think that they are without sin are like purblind people.

As if we were to suppose that two men, one of whom was clear sighted with perfect vision, and the other, one whose eyesight was obscured by dimness of vision, had together entered some great house that was filled with a quantity of bundles, instruments, and vessels, would not he, whose dullness of vision prevented his seeing everything, assert that there was nothing there but chests, beds, benches, tables, and whatever met the fingers of one who felt them rather than the eyes of one who saw them, while on the other hand would not the other, who searched out what was hidden with clear and bright eyes, declare that there were there many most minute articles, and what could scarcely be counted; which if they were ever gathered up into a single pile, would by their number equal or perhaps exceed the size of those few things which the other had felt. So then even saints, and, if we may so say, men who see, whose aim is the utmost perfection, cleverly detect in themselves even those things which the gaze of our mind being as it were darkened cannot see, and condemn them very severely, to such an extent that those who have not, as it seems to our carelessness, dimmed the whiteness of their body, which is as it were like snow, with even the slightest spot of sin, seem to themselves to be covered with many stains, if, I will not say any evil or vain thoughts creep into the doors of their mind, but even the recollection of a Psalm which has to be said takes off the attention of the kneeler at the time for prayer. For if, say they, when we ask some great man, I will not say for our life and salvation, but for some advantage and profit, we fasten all our attention of mind and body upon him, and hang with trembling expectation on his nod, with no slight dread lest haply some foolish or unsuitable word may turn aside the pity of our hearer, and then too, when we are standing in the forum or in the courts of earthly judges, with our opponent standing over against us, if in the midst of the prosecution and trial any coughing, or spitting, or laughing, or yawning, or sleep overtakes us, with what malice will our ever watchful opponent stir up the severity of the judge to our damage: how much more, when we entreat Him who knows all secrets, should we, by reason of our imminent danger of everlasting death, plead with earnest and anxious prayer for the kindness of the judge, especially as on the other side there stands one who is both our crafty seducer and our accuser! And not without reason will he be bound by no light sin, but by a grievous fault of wickedness, who, when he pours forth his prayer to God, departs at once from His sight as if from the eyes of one who neither sees nor hears, and follows the vanity of wicked thoughts. But they who cover the eyes of their heart with a thick veil of their sins, and as the Saviour says, "Seeing see not and hearing hear not nor understand," hardly regard in the inmost recesses of their breast even those faults which are great and deadly, and cannot with clear eyes look at any deceitful thoughts, nor even those vague and secret desires which strike the mind with slight and subtle suggestions, nor the captivities of their soul, but always wandering among impure thoughts they know not how to be sorry when they are distracted from that meditation which is so special, nor can they grieve that they have lost anything as while they lay open their mind to the entrance of any thought as they please, they have nothing set before them to hold to as the main thing or to desire in every way.

7

VII. Quod hi, qui pronuntiant esse hominem posse sine peccato, duplici in hoc agantur errore.

Haec sane nos in hunc errorem causa praecipitat, quia anamarteti, id est inpeccantiae ipsius uirtutem penitus ignorantes existimamus nullam omnino culpam ex istis otiosis ac lubricis cogitationum excursibus nos posse contrahere, sed hebitudine stupefacti et uelut oculorum caecitate percussi nihil in nobis nisi capitalia crimina contemplamur eaque tantummodo credimus euitanda, quae legum quoque saecularium seueritate damnantur, a quibus si nos inmunes uel paululum senserimus, nihil in nobis esse peccati protinus arbitramur. proinde ab illo uidentium numero segregati, quia minutias multarum sordium quae intra nos congestae sunt non uidemus, nequaquam salubri conpunctione mordemur, si sensum nostrum interpellauerit aegritudo tristitiae, nec dolemus nos uanae gloriae suggestione pulsari, nec de emissa tardius uel tepidius oratione deflemus, nec reputamus ad culpam cur psallentibus uel orantibus nobis aliquid aliud quam ipsa oratio uel psalmus occurrerit, nec illud horremus, quod multa, quae uel loqui uel agere coram hominibus pudet, non erubescimus uel ad horam corde concipere, quod diuino nouimus patere conspectui, nec pollutionem turpium somniorum larga fletuum ablutione purgamus, nec lugemus quod in ipsa elemosynae pietate, cum uel fratrum necessitatibus subuenimus uel alimonia pauperibus ministramus, serenitatem nostrae hilaritatis obnubilat auara cunctatio, nec feriri nos ullo credimus detrimento, cum derelicta memoria dei ea quae sunt temporalia atque corrupta cogitamus, ita ut nobis satis congrue Salomonis illud aptetur eloquium: feriunt me, sed non dolui: et deluserunt me, ego autem nesciui.

CHAPTER VII. How those who maintain that a man can be without sin are charged with a twofold error.

The reason however which drives us into this error is that, as we are utterly ignorant of the virtue of being without sin, we fancy that we cannot contract any guilt from those idle and random vagaries of our thoughts, but being rendered stupid by dullness and as it were smitten with blindness we can see nothing in ourselves but capital offences, and think that we have only to keep clear of those things which are condemned also by the severity of secular laws, and if we find that even for a short time we are free from these we at once imagine that there is no sin at all in us. Accordingly we are distinguished from the number of those who see, because we do not see the many small stains, which are crowded together in us, and are not smitten with saving contrition, if the malady of vexation overtakes our thoughts, nor are we sorry that we are struck by the suggestions of vainglory, nor do we weep over our prayers offered up so tardily and coldly, nor consider it a fault if while we are singing or praying, something else besides the actual prayer or Psalm fills our thoughts, nor are we horrified because we do not blush to conceive many things which we are ashamed to speak or do before men, in our heart, which, as we know, lies open to the Divine gaze; nor do we purge away the pollution of filthy dreams with copious ablutions of our tears, nor grieve that in the pious act of almsgiving when we are assisting the needs of the brethren, or ministering support to the poor, the brightness of our cheerfulness is clouded over by a stingy delay, nor do we think that we are affected by any loss when we forget God and think about things that are temporal and corrupt, so that these words of Solomon fairly apply to us: "They smite me but I have not grieved, and they have mocked me, but I knew it not."

8

VIII. Quod paucorum sit intellegere peccata.

E contra hi qui summam totius uoluptatis et gaudii et beatitudinis suae in diuinarum ac spiritalium rerum tantum contemplatione constituunt, cum ab ea inuiti uel paululum uiolentis cogitationibus abstrahuntur, uelut quoddam in se sacrilegii genus praesentis paenitudinis puniunt ultione, ac uilissimam creaturam, ad quam sit detortus mentis intuitus, creatori suo se praetulisse lugentes paene dixerim inpietatis sibi crimen adscribunt, et licet ad conspiciendam diuinae gloriae claritatem oculos cordis sui summa alacritate conuertant, tamen etiam breuissimas carnalium cogitationum tenebras non ferentes, quidquid ab illo uero lumine mentis aspectum retrahit, execrantur. denique cum hunc beatus apostolus Iohannes adfectum cunctis uellet infundere, filioli, inquit, nolite diligere mundum neque ea quae in mundo sunt, si quis diligit mundum, non est caritas dei in illo: quia omne quod in mundo est concupiscentia carnis et concupiscentia oculorum est et superbia uitae, quae non est ex patre, sed ex mundo est. et mundus perit et concupiscentia eius: qui autem facit uoluntatem dei, manet in aeternum. fastidiunt ergo sancti uniuersa quibus mundus iste subsistit, sed inpossibile est ut non ad ea uel breui cogitationum rapiantur excessu, nullusque etiamnunc hominum excepto domino et saluatore nostro naturalem peruagationem mentis ita defixam semper in dei contemplatione continuit, ut numquam ab ea raptus mundanae cuiusquam rei dilectione peccaret, dicente scriptura: sidera ipsa non sunt munda in conspectu eius, et iterum: si in sanctis suis non confidit, et in angelis suis repperit prauitatem, siue ut emendatior translatio habet: ecce inter sanctos eius nemo inmutabilis, et caeli non sunt mundi in conspectu eius.

CHAPTER VIII. How it is given to but few to understand what sin is.

Those on the other hand who make the sum of all their joy and delight and bliss consist in the contemplation of divine and spiritual things alone, if they are unwillingly withdrawn from them even for a short time by thoughts that force themselves upon them, punish this as if it were a kind of sacrilege in them, and avenge it by immediate chastisement, and in their grief that they have preferred some worthless creature (to which their mental gaze was turned aside) to their Creator, charge themselves with the guilt (I had almost said) of impiety, and although they turn the eyes of their heart with the utmost speed to behold the brightness of the Divine Glory, yet they cannot tolerate even for a very short time the darkness of carnal thoughts, and execrate whatever keeps back their soul's gaze from the true light. Finally when the blessed Apostle John would instill this feeling into everybody he says: "Little children, love not the world, neither the things which are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of God is not in him: for everything that is in the world is the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the pride of life, which is not of the Father but of the world. And the world perisheth and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth forever." The saints therefore scorn all those things on which the world exists, but it is impossible for them never to be carried away to them by a brief aberration of thoughts, and even now no man, except our Lord and Saviour, can keep his naturally wandering mind always fixed on the contemplation of God so as never to be carried away from it through the love of something in this world; as Scripture says: "Even the stars are not clean in His sight," and again: "If He puts no trust in His saints, and findeth iniquity in His angels," or as the more correct translation has it: "Behold among His saints none is unchangeable, and the heavens are not pure in His sight."

9

VIIII. Qua cautione memoriam dei monachus debeat custodire.

Recte igitur sanctos, qui memoriam dei stabiliter retinentes quasi per extentas in sublime lineas suspenso feruntur incessu, schoenobatis, quos uulgo funambulos uocant, dixerim conparandos, qui summam suae salutis ac uitae in angustissimo funiculi illius tramite conlocantes atrocissimam se mortem protinus incursuros esse non ambigunt, si uel exigua pes eorum titubatione deuiauerit aut modum illius salutaris directionis excesserit. qui dum arte mirifica aerios gressus per inania moliuntur, si illam angustiorem uestigio semitam non cauta atque sollicita moderatione seruauerint, terra, quae omnibus uelut naturalis est basis et solidissimum cunctis ac tutissimum fundamentum, fit illis praesens ac manifesta pernicies, non quia illius natura mutetur, sed quia illi ad eam praecipiti carnis pondere delabuntur. ita etiam indefessa illa dei bonitas inmutabilisque substantia ipsa quidem neminem laedit, sed nos declinando a summis atque ad ima tendendo nobis ipsi consciscimus mortem, immo ipsa declinatio mors efficitur declinanti. uae enim inquit eis, quoniam recesserunt a me: uastabuntur, quoniam praeuaricati sunt in me, et iterum: uae eis cum recessero ab eis. arguet namque te malitia tua, et auersio tua increpabit te. scito, et uide quam malum et amarum est reliquisse te dominum deum tuum. funiculis namque peccatorum suorum unusquisque constringitur. ad quos satis conpetenter a domino increpatio illa dirigitur: ecce, inquit, omnes uos accendentes ignem accincti flammis, ambulate in lumine ignis uestri, et in flammis, quas succendistis, et iterum qui incendit, inquit, malitiam, peribit ab ea.

CHAPTER IX. Of the care with which a monk should preserve the recollection of God.

I should say then that the saints who keep a firm hold of the recollection of God and are borne along, as it were, with their steps suspended on a line stretched out on high, may be rightly compared to rope dancers, commonly called funambuli, who risk all their safety and life on the path of that very narrow rope, with no doubt that they will immediately meet with a most dreadful death if their foot swerves or trips in the very slightest degree, or goes over the line of the course in which alone is safety. And while with marvellous skill they ply their airy steps through space, if they keep not their steps to that all too narrow path with careful and anxious regulation, the earth which is the natural base and the most solid and safest foundation for all, becomes to them an immediate and clear danger, not because its nature is changed, but because they fall headlong upon it by the weight of their bodies. So also that unwearied goodness of God and His unchanging nature hurts no one indeed, but we ourselves by falling from on high and tending to the depths are the authors of our own death, or rather the very fall becomes death to the faller. For it says: "Woe to them for they have departed from Me: they shall be wasted because they have transgressed against Me;" and again: "Woe to them when I shall depart from them." For "thine own wickedness shall reprove thee, and thy apostasy shall rebuke thee. Know thou and see that it is an evil and a bitter thing for thee to have left the Lord thy God;" for "every man is bound by the cords of his sins." To whom this rebuke is aptly directed by the Lord: "Behold," He says, "all you that kindle a fire, encompassed with flames, walk ye in the light of your fire and in the flames which you have kindled;" and again: "He that kindleth iniquity, shall perish by it."

10

X. Quod hi qui ad perfectionem tendunt in ueritate humilientur et dei gratia semper se sentiant indigere.

Cum ergo semet ipsos cotidie sentiant sancti terrenae cogitationis pondere praegrauatos ab illa mentis sublimitate decidere et inuitos, immo uero etiam nescientes in legem peccati mortisque transduci atque, ut cetera praetermittam, illis saltim quae superius conprehendi bonis quidem ac iustis, sed tamen terrenis a conspectu dei operibus auocari, habent profecto pro quibus ad dominum iugiter ingemescant, habent pro quibus in ueritate humiliati atque conpuncti non uerbis tantum, sed adfectu se pronuntient peccatores et ueniam pro omnibus, quae cotidie superati fragilitate carnis incurrunt, a gratia domini iugiter postulantes ueras paenitentiae lacrimas indesinenter effundant, quippe qui uideant isdem ipsis se pro quibus continuo dolore uexati sunt etiam usque ad ultimum uitae finem aestibus inuolutos etiam ipsas supplicationes suas offerre se sine cogitationum anxietate non posse, experti igitur se humanis uiribus desideratum finem obsistente carnis sarcina adtingere non ualere neque illi praecipuo summoque bono secundum cordis sui desiderium posse coniungi, sed ab eius intuitu captiuos ad mundana transduci, ad gratiam dei, qui impios iustificat, conuolantes cum apostolo protestantur: infelix ego homo: quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, sentiunt enim se bonum istud quod uolunt non posse perficere, sed in illud quod nolunt quodque oderunt malum, id est cogitationum motus uel curas carnalium rerum semper incurrere.

CHAPTER X. How those who are on the way to perfection are truly humble, and feel that they always stand in need of God's grace.

When then holy men feel that they are oppressed by the weight of earthly thoughts and fall away from their loftiness of mind, and that they are led away against their will or rather without knowing it, into the law of sin and death, and (to pass over other matters) are kept back by those actions which I described above, which are good and right though earthly, from the vision of God; they have something to groan over constantly to the Lord; they have something for which indeed to humble themselves, and in their contrition to profess themselves not in words only but in heart, sinners; and for this, while they continually ask of the Lord's grace pardon for everything that day by day they commit when overcome by the weakness of the flesh, they should shed without ceasing true tears of penitence; as they see that being involved even to the very end of their life in the very same troubles, with continual sorrow for which they are tried, they cannot even offer their prayers without harassing thoughts. So then as they know by experience that through the hindrance of the burden of the flesh they cannot by human strength reach the desired end, nor be united according to their heart's desire with that chief and highest good, but that they are led away from the vision of it captive to worldly things, they betake themselves to the grace of God, "Who justifieth the ungodly," and cry out with the Apostle: "O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? Thanks be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ." For they feel that they cannot perform the good that they would, but are ever falling into the evil which they would not, and which they hate, i.e., wandering thoughts and care for carnal things.

11

XI. Expositio illius sententiae: condelector enim legi dei secundum interiorem hominem et cetera.

Et condelectantur quidem legi dei secundum interiorem hominem, qui uisibilia uniuersa transcendens conatur deo soli semper uniri, sed uident aliam legem in membris suis, id est in natura humanae condicionis insertam, quae repugnans legi mentis eorum captiuum pertrahit sensum uiolenta lege peccati, conpellens scilicet eum relicto illo principali bono terrena cogitatione submitti. quae quamuis necessaria atque utilis uideatur, cum dispensatione religiosae cuiuspiam necessitatis inpenditur, conparatione tamen illius boni, quod sanctorum omnium oblectat intuitum, mala utique ab eis ac fugienda decernitur, quia per eam quoquo modo uel ad modicum tempus ab illius perfectae beatitudinis gaudio retrahuntur. uere enim lex peccati est, quam humano generi praeuaricatio sui induxit auctoris, per illius noxam in quem lata est aequissimi iudicis illa sententia: maledicta terra in operibus tuis: spinas et tribulos germinabit tibi, et in sudore uultus tui edes panem tuum. haec, inquam, est lex membris omnium inserta mortalium, quae repugnat legi mentis nostrae eamque a diuino arcet intuitu, quaeque maledicta terra in operibus nostris post agnitionem boni ac mali cogitationum spinas coepit ac tribulos germinare, quarum aculeis naturalia uirtutum semina praefocantur, ne illum panem nostrum, qui de caelo descendit quique confortat cor hominis, edere absque sudore uultus nostri possimus. omne igitur humanum genus huic generaliter legi sine ulla exceptione subicitur. nullus enim est quamuis sanctus, qui supra dictum panem non cum sudore uultus sui et sollicita cordis intentione percipiat. ceterum communi isto pane multi, ut uidemus, diuites sine ullo uultus sui sudore uescuntur.

CHAPTER XI. Explanation of the phrase: "For I delight in the law of God after the inner man," etc.

And they "delight" indeed "in the law of God after the inner man," which soars above all visible things and ever strives to be united to God alone, but they "see another law in their members," i.e., implanted in their natural human condition, which "resisting the law of their mind," brings their thoughts into captivity to the forcible law of sin, compelling them to forsake that chief good and submit to earthly notions, which though they may appear necessary and useful when they are taken up in the interests of some religious want, yet when they are set against that good which fascinates the gaze of all the saints, are seen by them to be bad and such as should be avoided, because by them in some way or other and for a short time they are drawn away from the joy of that perfect bliss. For the law of sin is really what the fall of its first father brought on mankind by that fault of his, against which there was uttered this sentence by the most just Judge: "Cursed is the ground in thy works; thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to thee, and in the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread." This, I say, is the law, implanted in the members of all mortals, which resists the law of our mind and keeps it back from the vision of God, and which, as the earth is cursed in our works after the knowledge of good and evil, begins to produce the thorns and thistles of thoughts, by the sharp pricks of which the natural seeds of virtues are choked, so that without the sweat of our brow we cannot eat our bread which "cometh down from heaven," and which "strengtheneth man's heart." The whole human race in general therefore is without exception subject to this law. For there is no one, however saintly, who does not take the bread mentioned above with the sweat of his brow and anxious efforts of his heart. But many rich men, as we see, are fed on that common bread without any sweat of their brow.

12

XII. Item illius: scimus autem quoniam lex spiritalis est et cetera.

Quam etiam legem beatus apostolus spiritalem adserit dicens: scimus autem quia lex spiritalis est: ego autem carnalis sum, uenundatus sub peccato. spiritalis enim est lex haec quae iubet nobis, ut in sudore uultus nostri comedamus panem illum uerum qui de caelo descendit, sed nos carnales efficit uenundatio illa peccati. quod rogo istud cuiusue peccatum est? sine dubio Adae, cuius praeuaricatione atque ut ita dicam negotiatione damnosa fraudulentoque conmercio uenditi sumus. omnem enim prolem suam serpentis persuasione seductus inliciti cibi perceptione distractam iugo perpetuae seruitutis addixit. hic namque mos solet inter uendentem ementemque seruari, ut is qui se alieno cupit dominio mancipare, pretium pro iactura propriae libertatis et addictione perpetuae seruitutis a suo consequatur emptore. quod etiam inter Adam atque serpentem manifestissime uidemus impletum. ille enim a serpente pretium libertatis suae esu interdictae arboris capiens a naturali libertate discessit illique maluit semet ipsum perpetua dedere seruitute, a quo uetiti pomi letale pretium fuerat adsecutus: qua deinceps condicione constrictus non inmerito omnem posteritatis suae progeniem perpetuo eidem cuius effectus est seruus subdidit famulatu. quid enim aliud seruile coniugium potest procreare quam seruos? quid ergo? numquid emptor iste uersutus et callidus domino uero atque legitimo ius dominationis eripuit? non ita est. neque enim sic ille omne peculium dei unius fraudis dolositate peruasit, ut potentiam dominii sui uerus dominator amitteret, qui ipsum quoque emptorem quamuis refugam uel rebellem tamen iugo deprimit seruitutis: sed quia omnibus rationabilibus creaturis arbitrii libertatem creator indulserat, eos, qui se contra fas edacis concupiscentiae transgressione uendiderant, inuitos ad ingenitam libertatem reuocare non debuit. abhorret siquidem ab illo iustitiae ac pietatis auctore, quidquid bonitati aequitatique contrarium est. malum enim fuerat si concessae libertatis beneficium reuocasset, iniustum si liberum hominem potentia sua opprimens atque captiuans libertatis acceptae pontificium exequi non siuisset, cuius salutem in futura tunc saecula reseruauit, ut recto ordine conpleretur statuti temporis plenitudo. oportebat enim eius subolem tamdiu sub auita condicione durare, quousque eam de originalibus uinculis liberatam in antiquum libertatis statum prioris domini gratia pretio sui sanguinis reformaret, quam potuit etiam tunc saluare, sed noluit, quia eum decreti sui inrumpere sanctionem aequitas non sinebat. uis nosse causam uenditionis tuae? audi ipsum redemptorem tuum per Esaiam prophetam apertissime proclamantem: quis est liber repudii matris uestrae, quo dimisi eam? aut quis est creditor meus, cui uendidi uos? ecce in iniquitatibus uestris uenditi estis, et in sceleribus uestris dimisi matrem uestram. uis etiam euidenter agnoscere, cur te iugo seruitutis addictum redimere potentiae suae uirtute noluerit? audi quid ad superiora, quibus eisdem famulis peccatorum causam uoluntariae uenditionis exprobrat, adiecerit: numquid adbreuiata et paruula facta est manus mea, ut non possim redimere? aut non est in me uirtus ad liberandum? sed quid huic potentissimae misericordiae eius semper obstiterit, idem propheta demonstrans ecce, inquit, non est adbreuiata manus domini ut saluare nequeat, neque adgrauata est auris eius ut non exaudiat: sed iniquitates uestrae diuiserunt inter uos et deum uestrum, et peccata uestra absconderunt faciem eius a uobis ne exaudiret.

CHAPTER XII. Of this also: "But we know that the law is spiritual," etc.

And this law the Apostle also calls spiritual saying: "But we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin." For this law is spiritual which bids us eat in the sweat of our brow that "true bread which cometh down from heaven" but that sale under sin makes us carnal. What, I ask, or whose is that sin? Doubtless Adam's, by whose fall, and, if I may so say, ruinous transaction and fraudulent bargain we were sold. For when he was led astray by the persuasion of the serpent he brought all his descendants under the yoke of perpetual bondage, as they were alienated by taking the forbidden food. For this custom is generally observed between the buyer and seller, that one who wants to make himself over to the power of another, receives from his buyer a price for the loss of his liberty, and his consignment to perpetual slavery. And we can very plainly see that this took place between Adam and the serpent. For by eating of the forbidden tree he received from the serpent the price of his liberty, and gave up his natural freedom and chose to give himself up to perpetual slavery to him from whom he had obtained the deadly price of the forbidden fruit; and thenceforth he was bound by this condition and not without reason subjected all the offspring of his posterity to perpetual service to him whose slave he had become. For what can any marriage in slavery produce but slaves? What then? Did that cunning and crafty buyer take away the rights of ownership from the true and lawful lord? Not so. For neither did he overcome all God's property by the craft of a single act of deception so that the true lord lost his rights of ownership, who though the buyer himself was a rebel and a renegade, yet oppressed him with the yoke of slavery; but because the Creator had endowed all reasonable creatures with free will, he would not restore to their natural liberty against their will those who contrary to right had sold themselves by the sin of greedy lust. Since anything that is contrary to goodness and fairness is abhorrent to Him who is the Author of justice and piety. For it would have been wrong for Him to have recalled the blessing of freedom granted, unfair for Him to have by His power oppressed man who was free, and by taking him captive, not to have allowed him to exercise the prerogative of the freedom he had received, as He was reserving his salvation for future ages, that in due season the fulness of the appointed time might be fulfilled. For it was right that his offspring should remain under the ancient conditions for so long a time, until by the price of His own blood the grace of the Lord redeemed them from their original chains and set them free in the primeval state of liberty, though He was able even then to save them, but would not, because equity forbade Him to break the terms of His own decree. Would you know the reason for your being sold? Hear thy Redeemer Himself proclaiming openly by Isaiah the prophet: "What is this bill of the divorce of your mother with which I have put her away? Or who is My creditor to whom I sold you? Behold you are sold for your iniquities and for your wicked deeds have I put your mother away." Would you also plainly see why when you were consigned to the yoke of slavery He would not redeem you by the might of His own power? Hear what He added to the former passage, and how He charges the same servants of sin with the reason for their voluntary sale. "Is My hand shortened and become little that I cannot redeem, or is there no strength in Me to deliver?" But what it is which is always standing in the way of His most powerful pity the same prophet shows when he says: "Behold the hand of the Lord is not shortened that it cannot save, neither is His ear heavy that it cannot hear: But your iniquities have divided between you and your God and your sins have hid His face from you that He should not hear."

13

XIII. Item illius: scio autem quod non habitat in me, hoc est in carne mea bonum.

Quia ergo carnales nos fecit et spinis ac tribulis condemnauit illa dei prima maledictio, nosque ita iniquo pater noster conmercio uenundauit, ut bonum quod uolumus agere nequeamus, dum diuulsi a memoria summi dei ea quae humanae fragilitatis sunt cogitare conpellimur, dum puritatis amore flagrantes incentiuis naturalibus, quae penitus ignorare uellemus, etiam inuiti plerumque conpungimur: scimus quia non habitat in carne nostra bonum, id est huius quam diximus theoriae atque puritatis perpetua iugisque tranquillitas, sed factum est in nobis istud pessimum ac lugubre diuortium, ut, cum mente legi dei seruire uelimus, numquam scilicet uolentes a claritate diuina dimouere conspectum, tamen carnalibus tenebris circumfusi quadam lege peccati ab eo quod bonum nouimus cogamur auelli, scilicet ad curas cogitationesque terrenas ab illa mentis celsitudine decidentes, ad quas nos lex peccati, id est illa sententia dei non inmerito condemnauit, quam primus delictor excepit. et inde est quod beatus apostolus, cum apertissime fateatur ineuitabili se uel omnes sanctos peccati huius necessitate constringi, tamen neminem eorum ob hoc esse damnandum audenter enuntiat dicens: nihil ergo nunc damnationis est his qui sunt in Christo Iesu. lex enim spiritus uitae in Christo Iesu liberauit me a lege peccati et mortis: id est cotidiana gratia Christi omnes sanctos suos ab hac lege peccati et mortis, in qua iugiter nolentes incurrere coguntur, cum remissionem debitorum suorum dominum deprecantur, absoluit. uidetis ergo non ex persona peccatorum, sed ex illorum qui uere sancti atque perfecti sunt hanc beatum apostolum prompsisse sententiam: non enim quod uolo facio bonum, sed quod odi malum, hoc ago, et: legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati quod est in membris meis.

CHAPTER XIII. Of this also: "But I know that in me, that is in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing."

Because then the original curse of God has made us carnal and condemned us to thorns and thistles, and our father has sold us by that unhappy bargain so that we cannot do the good that we would, while we are torn away from the recollection of God Most High and forced to think on what belongs to human weakness, while burning with the love of purity, we are often even against our will troubled by natural desires, which we would rather know nothing about; we know that in our flesh there dwelleth no good thing viz., the perpetual and lasting peace of this meditation of which we have spoken; but there is brought about in our case that miserable and wretched divorce, that when with the mind we want to serve the law of God, since we never want to remove our gaze from the Divine brightness, yet surrounded as we are by carnal darkness we are forced by a kind of law of sin to tear ourselves away from the good which we know, as we fall away from that lofty height of mind to earthly cares and thoughts, to which the law of sin, i.e., the sentence of God, which the first delinquent received, has not without reason condemned us. And hence it is that the blessed Apostle, though he openly admits that he and all saints are bound by the constraint of this sin, yet boldly asserts that none of them will be condemned for this, saying: "There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus: for the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath set me free from the law of sin and death," i.e., the grace of Christ day by day frees all his saints from this law of sin and death, under which they are constantly reluctantly obliged to come, whenever they pray to the Lord for the forgiveness of their trespasses. You see then that it was in the person not of sinners but of those who are really saints and perfect, that the blessed Apostle gave utterance to this saying: "For I do not the good that I would, but the evil which I hate, that I do;" and: "I see another law in my members resisting the law of my mind and bringing me captive to the law of sin which is in my members."

14

XIIII. Obiectio, quod neque infidelium personis conueniat neque sanctorum quod ait: non enim quod uolo facio bonum et cetera.

Germanus: Neque eorum qui capitalibus criminibus inplicantur neque apostoli uel illorum qui ad eius profecere mensuram hoc dicimus congruere posse personis, sed de his proprie hoc intellegi debere censemus, qui post dei gratiam agnitionemque ueritatis a carnalibus se uitiis abstinere cupientes antiqua adhuc consuetudine uelut naturali lege in membris suis uiolentissime dominante ad inolitam passionum concupiscentiam pertrahuntur. usus enim et frequentia delinquendi uelut lex efficitur naturalis, quae membris humanae infirmitatis inserta adfectus animae necdum plenis uirtutum studiis eruditae, sed adhuc rudis ac tenerae ut ita dixerim castitatis captiuos rapit ad uitia, ac morti eos antiqua lege subiciens iugo peccati dominantis addicit, non sinens eos bonum quod diligunt puritatis adipisci, sed potius malum quod execrantur exercere conpellens.

CHAPTER XIV. An objection, that the saying: "For I do not the good that I would," etc., applies to the persons neither of unbelievers nor of saints.

Germanus: We say that this does not apply to the persons either of those who are involved in capital offences, or of an Apostle and those who have advanced to his measure, but we think that it ought properly to be taken of those who after receiving the grace of God and the knowledge of the truth, are anxious to keep themselves from carnal sins but, as ancient custom like a natural law rules most forcibly in their members, they are carried away to the ingrained lust of their passions. For the custom and frequency of sinning becomes like a natural law, which, implanted in the man's weak members, leads the feelings of the soul that is not yet instructed in all the pursuits of virtue, but is still, if I may say so, of an uninstructed and tender chastity, captive to sin and subjecting them by an ancient law to death, brings them under the yoke of sin that rules over them, not suffering them to obtain the good of purity which they love, but rather forcing them to do the evil which they hate.

15

XV. Responsio ad obiectionem propositam.

Theonas: Non parum uestra profecit opinio: siquidem etiam uos ipsi adstruere iam coepistis in illorum persona qui omnino peccatores sunt hoc penitus stare non posse, illis autem qui se a uitiis carnalibus abstinere contendunt proprie conuenire. quos quoniam a peccatorum iam numero segregastis, consequens est ut etiam fidelium atque sanctorum paulatim coetibus inseratis. quae enim genera peccatorum istos dicitis posse conmittere, quibus si fuerint post gratiam baptismatis inuoluti, rursum per cotidianam Christi gratiam liberentur? aut de quo mortis corpore apostolus dixisse credendus est: quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum? nonne manifestum est, sicut uos quoque ipsos ueritas conpulit confiteri, non de illis capitalium criminum membris quibus stipendium aeternae mortis adquiritur, id est homicidii, fornicationis, adulteriorum, ebrietatis, furtorum atque rapinarum, sed de illo praedicto cui gratia Christi cotidiana succurrit corpore memorari? quisquis enim post baptismum et scientiam dei in illud mortis corpus inruerit, sciat se non cotidiana gratia Christi, id est facili remissione, quam momentis singulis exoratus dominus noster erroribus nostris donare consueuit, sed aut diuturna adflictione paenitudinis ac poenali dolore purgandum aut certe pro his in futurum aeterni ignis suppliciis addicendum, ita eodem apostolo pronuntiante: nolite falli: neque fornicarii neque idolis seruientes neque adulteri neque molles neque masculorum concubitores neque fures neque auari neque ebriosi neque maledici neque rapaces regnum dei possidebunt. aut quae ista lex est militans in membris nostris, quae repugnet legi mentis nostrae, cumque nos resistentes atque captiuos in lege peccati ac mortis abduxerit eique nos fecerit carne seruire, nihilominus mente legi dei seruire permittat? nec enim hic puto legem peccati flagitia designare aut de supra dictis intellegi posse criminibus, quae si quis facit, legi dei mente non seruit, a qua necesse est eum animo ante desciscere quam aliquid eorum carne conmittat. quid est enim seruire legi peccati, nisi illa quae a peccato imperantur inplere? quod ergo peccati genus est, quo cum se tanta sanctitas atque perfectio sentiat captiuari, gratia tamen Christi non ambigat liberandam dicens: infelix ego homo: quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum? quam, inquam, membris nostris legem inesse firmabitis, quae abstrahens nos a lege dei et captiuans in lege peccati infelices nos potius faciat quam nocentes, ut non aeternis suppliciis addicamur, sed quasi de interrupto beatitudinis gaudio suspiremus et auxiliatorem qui nos ad id retrahat inquirentes cum apostolo proclamemus: infelix ego homo: quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? abduci namque captiuum in lege peccati quid est aliud quam in effectu peccati atque opere permanere? aut quod aliud principale dabitur bonum quod sancti explere non possint, nisi id, ad cuius conparationem ut supra diximus uniuersa nec bona sunt? equidem nouimus multa esse in hoc mundo bona praecipueque pudicitiam, continentiam, sobrietatem, humilitatem, iustitiam. misericordiam, temperantiam, pietatem: sed haec omnia et summo illi bono paria esse non possunt et perfici non dicam ab apostolis, sed etiam a mediocribus possunt, et a quibus inpleta non fuerint, aut aeterno supplicio puniuntur aut grandi ut supra dictum est labore paenitentiae, non cotidiana Christi gratia liberantur. superest igitur ut hanc apostoli sententiam soli sanctorum personae recte fateamur aptari, qui in hanc quam praediximus incurrentes cotidie peccati, non criminum legem de statu salutis suae certi non praecipitantur in facinus, sed ut saepe dictum est de contemplatione diuina ad miseriam cogitationum corporalium deuoluti uerae illius beatitudinis bono plerumque fraudantur. si enim se per hanc membrorum suorum legem cotidianis sentirent sceleribus inligari, non utique de felicitatis amissione, sed de innocentiae causarentur, nec diceret apostolus Paulus infelix ego homo, sed inpurus aut scelestus ego homo, nec de corpore mortis huius, hoc est de condicione mortali, sed a flagitiis atque criminibus carnis huius uellet absolui. sed quia se pro condicione fragilitatis humanae senserat captiuatum, id est abductum ad sollicitudines curasque carnales, quae lex peccati et mortis operatur, ingemescens super hac quam inuitus incurrerat lege peccati confestim recurrit ad Christum et praesentissima gratiae eius redemptione saluatur. quidquid ergo lex illa peccati, quae spinas et tribulos cogitationum curarumque mortalium naturaliter gignit, etiam in apostolici pectoris terra sollicitudinis germinarit, ista lex gratiae mox auellit. lex enim, inquit, spiritus uitae in Christo Iesu liberauit te a lege peccati et mortis.

CHAPTER XV. The answer to the objection raised.

Theonas: Your notion does not come to much; as you yourselves have actually now begun to maintain that this cannot possibly stand in the person of those who are out and out sinners, but that it properly applies to those who are trying to keep themselves clear from carnal sins. And since you have already separated these from the number of sinners, it follows that you must shortly admit them into the ranks of the faithful and holy. For what kinds of sin do you say that those can commit, from which, if they are involved in them after the grace of baptism, they can be freed by the daily grace of Christ? or of what body of death are we to think that the Apostle said: "Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord"? Is it not clear, as truth compels you yourselves also to admit, that it is spoken not of those members of capital crimes, by which the wages of eternal death are gained; viz., murder, fornication, adultery, drunkenness, thefts and robberies, but of that body before mentioned, which the daily grace of Christ assists? For whoever after baptism and the knowledge of God falls into that death, must know that he will either have to be cleansed, not by the daily grace of Christ, i.e., an easy forgiveness, which our Lord when at any moment He is prayed to, is wont to grant to our errors, but by a lifelong affliction of penitence and penal sorrow, or else will be hereafter consigned to the punishment of eternal fire for them, as the same Apostle thus declares: "Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor defilers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous persons, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners shall possess the kingdom of God." Or what is that law warring in our members which resists the law of our mind, and when it has led us resisting but captives to the law of sin and death, and has made us serve it with the flesh, nevertheless suffers us to serve the law of God with the mind? For I do not suppose that this law of sin denotes crimes or can be taken of the offences mentioned above, of which if a man is guilty he does not serve the law of God with the mind, from which law he must first have departed in heart before he is guilty of any of them with the flesh. For what is it to serve the law of sin, but to do what is commanded by sin? What sort of sin then is it to which so great holiness and perfection feels that it is captive, and yet doubts not that it will be freed from it by the grace of Christ, saying: "O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord"? What law, I ask, will you maintain to be implanted in our members, which, withdrawing us from the law of God and bringing us into captivity to the law of sin, could make us wretched rather than guilty so that we should not be consigned to eternal punishment, but still as it were sigh for the unbroken joys of bliss, and, seeking for a helper who shall restore us to it, exclaim with the Apostle:' "O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" For what is it to be led captive to the law of sin but to continue to perform and commit sin? Or what other chief good can be given which the saints cannot fulfil, except that in comparison with which, as we said above, everything else is not good? Indeed we know that many things in this world are good, and chiefly, modesty, continence, sobriety, humility, justice, mercy, temperance, piety: but all of these things fail to come up to that chief good, and can be done I say not by apostles, but even by ordinary folk; and, those by whom they are not done, are either chastised with eternal punishment, or are set free by great exertions, as was said above, of penitence, and not by the daily grace of Christ. It remains then for us to admit that this saying of the Apostle is rightly applied only to the persons of saints, who day after day falling under this law, which we described, of sin not of crimes, are secure of their salvation and not precipitated into wicked deeds, but, as has often been said, are drawn away from the contemplation of God to the misery of bodily thoughts, and are often deprived of the blessing of that true bliss. For if they felt that by this law of their members they were bound daily to crimes, they would complain of the loss not of happiness but of innocence, and the Apostle Paul would not say: "O wretched man that I am," but "Impure," or "Wicked man that I am," and he would wish to be rid not of the body of this death, i.e., this mortal state, but of the crimes and misdeeds of this flesh. But because by reason of his state of human frailty he felt that he was captive, i.e., led away to carnal cares and anxieties which the law of sin and death causes, he groans over this law of sin under which against his will he had fallen, and at once has recourse to Christ and is saved by the present redemption of His grace. Whatever of anxiety therefore that law of sin, which naturally produces the thorns and thistles of mortal thoughts and cares, has caused to spring up in the ground of the Apostle's breast, that the law of grace at once plucks up. "For the law," says he, "of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath set me free from the law of sin and death."

16

XVI. Quid sit corpus peccati.

Hoc ergo ineuitabile corpus est mortis, in quo perfecti quique qui gustauerunt quam suauis est dominus cotidie reuoluti sentiunt cum propheta quam malum sibi et amarum sit discedere a domino deo suo. hoc est corpus mortis, quod a caelesti eos intuitu retrahens ad terrena deducit, quod psallentes eos atque in oratione prostratos uel humanas effigies uel sermones uel negotia uel actus facit superfluos retractare. hoc est corpus mortis, quo aemulantes angelicam sanctitatem et uolentes domino iugiter inhaerere perfectionem tamen huius boni, quia mortis corpus obsistit, inuenire non possunt, sed faciunt malum quod nolunt, id est traducuntur mente etiam ad illa quae ad profectum uirtutum perfectionemque non pertinent, denique ut hoc de sanctis atque perfectis sibique similibus se dixisse beatus apostolus euidenter exprimeret, digito quodammodo semet ipsum tantum designans continuo infert itaque ego ipse, id est qui haec pronuntio, meae, non alterius conscientiae latebras pando. hoc sane elocutionis genere familiariter uti apostolus solet, si quando uult se specialiter designare, sicut ibi: ipse ego Paulus obsecro uos per mansuetudinem et modestiam Christi, et rursum: nisi quod ego ipse non grauaui uos, et iterum: sed esto, ego ipse non grauaui uos, et alibi: ego ipse Paulus dico uobis: si circumcidamini, Christus uobis nihil proderit, et ad Romanos: optabam enim anathema esse ipse ego a Christo pro fratribus meis. potest autem non absurde etiam sic accipi, ut expressius cum emphasi pronuntietur itaque ego ipse, id est quem nostis esse apostolum Christi, quem tota suspicientia ueneramini, quem creditis summum esse atque perfectum et in quo loquitur Christus, cum mente seruiam legi dei, carne tamen legi peccati seruire me fateor, hoc est distentione condicionis humanae interdum de caelestibus ad terrena deuoluor et ad curas humilium rerum mentis meae altitudo prolabitur: per quam peccati legem ita momentis singulis me sentio captiuari, ut quamuis inmobili circa legem dei desiderio perseuerem, nullo tamen modo uim huius captiuitatis euadere posse me sentiam, nisi confugero semper ad gratiam saluatoris.

CHAPTER XVI. What is the body of sin.

This then is that body of death from which we cannot escape, pent in which those who are perfect, who have tasted "how gracious the Lord is," daily feel with the prophet "how bad for himself and bitter it is for a man to depart from the Lord his God." This is the body of death which restrains us from the heavenly vision and drags us back to earthly things, which causes men while singing Psalms and kneeling in prayer to have their thoughts filled with human figures, or conversations, or business, or unnecessary actions. This is the body of death, owing to which those, who would emulate the sanctity of angels, and who long to cling continually to God, yet are unable to arrive at the perfection of this good, because the body of death stands in their way, but they do the evil that they would not, i.e., they are dragged down in their minds even to the things which have nothing to do with their advance and perfection in virtue. Finally that the blessed Apostle might clearly denote that he said this of saintly and perfect men, and those like himself, he in a way points with his finger to himself and at once proceeds: "And so I myself," i.e., I who say this, lay bare the secrets of my own not another's conscience. This mode of speech at any rate the Apostle is familiarly accustomed to use, whenever he wants to point specially to himself, as here: "I, Paul, myself beseech you by the mildness and modesty of Christ;" and again: "except that I myself was not burdensome to you;" and once more: "But be it so: I myself did not burden you;" and elsewhere: "I, Paul, myself say unto you: if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing;" and to the Romans: "For I could wish that I myself were Anathema from Christ for my brethren." But it cannot unreasonably be taken in this way, that "And so I myself" is expressly said with emphasis, i.e., I whom you know to be an Apostle of Christ, whom you venerate with the utmost respect, whom you believe to be of the highest character and perfect, and one in whom Christ speaks, though with the mind I serve the law of God, yet with the flesh I confess that I serve the law of sin, i.e., by the occupations of my human condition I am sometimes dragged down from heavenly to earthly things and the height of my mind is brought down to the level of care for humble matters. And by this law of sin I find that at every moment I am so taken captive that although I persist in my immovable longing around the law of God, yet in no way can I escape the power of this captivity, unless I always fly to the grace of the Saviour.

17

XVII. Quod sancti omnes ueraciter inmundos se et peccatores esse confessi sunt.

Et idcirco cotidianis suspiriis sancti omnes pro hac substantiae suae fragilitate conpuncti, dum cogitationum uarietates et conscientiae suae latebras ac penetralia perscrutantur, suppliciter clamant: non intres in iudicio cum seruo tuo: quia non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens, et illud: quis gloriabitur castum se habere cor? aut quis fiduciam habebit se mundum esse a peccato? et iterum: non est iustus homo in terra, qui faciat bonum, et non peccabit, sed et illud: delicta quis intellegit? et ita infirmam hominum inperfectamque iustitiam ac misericordiae dei semper indiguam esse censuerunt, ut unus ex his, cuius iniquitates atque peccata deus misso de altari ignito uerbi sui carbone purgauit, post illam mirificam contemplationem dei, post intuitum sublimium Seraphin et reuelationem sacramentorum caelestium dicat: uae mihi, quia uir pollutus labiis ego sum, et in medio populi polluta labia habentis ego habito. qui, sicut arbitror, labiorum suorum inmunditiam ne tunc quidem fortasse sensisset, nisi ueram perfectionis et integram puritatem contemplatione dei meruisset agnoscere, cuius intuitu pollutionem suam sibi ante incognitam repente cognouit. cum enim ait: uae mihi, quia uir pollutus labiis ego sum, de suorum hoc eum labiorum, non de populi pollutione confessum id quod sequitur manifestat: et in medio populi polluta labia habentis ego habito. sed etiam cum orans peccatorum quasi uniuersalium inmunditiam confitetur, non iniquorum tantum, sed etiam iustorum plebem generali supplicatione conplectitur dicens: ecce tu iratus es, et peccauimus: in ipsis fuimus semper, et saluabimur. facti sumus ut inmundus omnes nos, tamquam pannus menstruatae uniuersae iustitiae nostrae. rogo quid euidentius hac potest esse sententia, qua non unam tantum, sed uniuersas iustitias nostras propheta conplexus et circumspiciens omnia, quae uel inmunda uel horrida iudicantur, quia nihil in hominum conuersatione sordidius neque inpurius potuit repperire, panno eas conparare maluit menstruatae. frustra ergo manifestissimae ueritati spinosae obiectionis acumen opponitur, sicut paulo ante dixistis si nemo sine peccato, nullus est sanctus, si nemo sanctus, nullus ergo saluabitur. hoc enim prophetae testimonio potest nodus huius quaestionis absolui: ecce, inquit, tu iratus es, et peccauimus: id est cum elationem nostri cordis uel neglegentias auersatus tuo nos auxilio denudasti, confestim nos uorago absorbuit peccatorum, uelut si quis splendidissimo solis diceret elemento: ecce tu obcubuisti, et nos ilico tenebrosa contexit obscuritas. et tamen cum hic sanctos peccasse dicat et non solum peccasse, sed etiam in ipsis semper permansisse peccatis, non desperat penitus de salute, sed subicit: in ipsis fuimus semper, et saluabimur. hanc ego sententiam ecce tu iratus es, et peccauimus illi apostolicae conparabo: infelix ego homo: quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? rursum quod propheta subiungit in ipsis fuimus semper, et saluabimur consequentibus apostoli congruit uerbis: gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum, similiter etiam illud eiusdem prophetae uae mihi, quia uir pollutus labiis ego sum, et in medio populi polluta labia habentis ego habito uidetur supra dictos sapere sermones: infelix ego homo: quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? itemque quod sequitur in propheta et ecce uolauit ad me unus de Seraphin, et in manu eius carbunculus (siue calculus), quem forcipe tulerat de altari. et tetigit os meum, et dixit: ecce hoc tetigi labia tua, et auferetur iniquitas tua, et peccatum tuum mundabitur tale est ut Pauli uideatur ore prolatum, qui ait: gratia dei per Iesum Christum dominum nostrum. uidetis ergo quemadmodum omnes sancti non tam ex persona populi quam ex sua et peccatores se ueraciter fateantur et tamen nequaquam de sua salute desperent, sed iustificationis plenitudinem, quam pro condicione fragilitatis humanae consequi se posse diffidunt, de gratia domini et miseratione praesumant.

CHAPTER XVII. How all the saints have confessed with truth that they were unclean and sinful.

And therefore with daily sighs all the saints grieve over this weakness of their nature and while they search into their shifting thoughts and the secrets and inmost recesses of their conscience, cry out in entreaty: "Enter not into judgment with Thy servant, for in Thy sight shall no man living be justified;" and this: "Who will boast that he hath a chaste heart? or who will have confidence that he is pure from sin?" and again: "There is not a righteous man upon earth that doeth good and sinneth not;" and this also: "Who knoweth his faults?" And so they have recognized that man's righteousness is weak and imperfect and always needs God's mercy, so that one of those whose iniquities and sins God purged away with the live coal of His word sent from the altar, after that marvellous vision of God, after his view of the Seraphim on high and the revelation of heavenly mysteries, said: "Woe is me! for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips." And I fancy that perhaps even then he would not have felt the uncleanness of his lips, unless it had been given him to recognize the true and complete purity of perfection by the vision of God, at the sight of Whom he suddenly became aware of his own uncleanness, of which he had previously been ignorant. For when he says: "Woe is me! for I am a man of unclean lips," he shows that his confession that follows refers to his own lips, and not to the uncleanness of the people: "and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips." But even when in his prayer he confesses the uncleanness of all sinners, he embraces in his general supplication not only the mass of the wicked but also of the good, saying: "Behold Thou art angry, and we have sinned: in them we have been always, and we shall be saved. We are all become as one unclean, and all our righteousnesses as filthy rags." What, I ask, could be clearer than this saying, in which the prophet includes not one only but all our righteousnesses and, looking round on all things that are considered unclean and disgusting, because he could find nothing in the life of men fouler or more unclean, chose to compare them to filthy rags. In vain then is the sharpness of a nagging objection raised against this perfectly clear truth, as a little while back you said: "If no one is without sin, then no one is holy; and if no one is holy, then no one will be saved." For the puzzle of this question can be solved by the prophet's testimony. "Behold," he says, "Thou art angry and we have sinned," i.e., when Thou didst reject our pride of heart or our carelessness, and deprive us of Thine aid, at once the abyss of our sins swallowed us up, as if one should say to the bright substance of the sun: Behold thou hast set, and at once murky darkness covered us. And yet though he here says that the saints have sinned, and have not only sinned but also have always remained in their sins, he does not altogether despair of salvation but adds: "In them we have been always, and we shall be saved." This saying: "Behold Thou art angry and we have sinned," I will compare to that one of the Apostle's: "O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" Again this that the prophet subjoins: "In them we have been always, and we shall be saved," corresponds to the following words of the Apostle: "Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord." In the same way also this passage of the same prophet: "Woe is me! for I am a man of unclean lips and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips," seems to agree with the words quoted above: "O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" And what follows in the prophet: "And behold there flew to me one of the Seraphim, having in his hand a coal (or stone) which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar. And he touched my mouth and said: Lo, with this I have touched thy lips, and thine iniquity is taken away and thy sin is purged," is just what seems to have fallen from the mouth of Paul, who says: "Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord." You see then how all the saints with truth confess not so much in the person of the people as in their own that they are sinners, and yet by no means despair of their salvation, but look for full justification (which they do not hope that they cannot obtain by virtue of the state of human frailty) from the grace and mercy of the Lord.

18

XVIII. Etiam iustos et sanctos sine peccato non esse.

Neminem uero in hac uita quamuis sanctum inmunem esse a debitis peccatorum etiam magisterium nos edocet saluatoris, qui discipulis suis perfectae orationis formulam tradens inter reliqua illa sublimia sacratissimaque mandata, quae, quoniam non nisi sanctis perfectisque sunt tradita, malis et infidelibus conuenire non possunt, hoc iussit interseri: et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. si ergo uera haec et a sanctis profertur oratio, sicut indubitanter credere nos oportet, quis tam contumax et praesumptor, tam superbia diabolici furoris elatus poterit inueniri, qui sine peccato se esse pronuntians non solum maiorem se apostolis credat, uerum etiam ipsum quasi ignorantiae aut uanitatis arguat saluatorem, ut scilicet aut nescierit esse posse aliquos inmunes a debitis, aut frustra docuerit eos quos scierit orationis istius remedio non egere? sed cum regis sui praecepta seruantes omnes omnino sancti cotidie dicant dimitte nobis debita nostra, si uerum dicunt, uere nemo est inmunis a culpa, si autem fingunt, aeque uerum est eos mendacii non carere peccato. unde etiam ille sapientissimus Ecclesiastes uniuersos actus et humana studia mente percurrens sine ulla exceptione pronuntiat: quia non est iustus homo in terra, qui faciat bonum, et non peccabit: id est nemo in hac terra tam sanctus, tam diligens, tam intentus uel potuit umquam uel poterit inueniri, qui uero illi ac singulari bono ita iugiter ualeat inhaerere, ut non cotidie ab eo distractum se sentiat deliquisse. qui tamen cum pronuntietur inmunis a noxa esse non posse, iustus esse nihilominus non negatur.

CHAPTER XVIII. That even good and holy men are not without sin.

But that no one however holy is in this life free from trespasses and sin, we are told also by the teaching of the Saviour, who gave His disciples the form of the perfect prayer; and among those other sublime and sacred commands, which as they were only given to the saints and perfect cannot apply to the wicked and unbelievers, He bade this to be inserted: "And forgive us our debts as we also forgive our debtors." If then this is offered as a true prayer and by saints, as we ought without the shadow of a doubt to believe, who can be found so obstinate and impudent, so puffed up with the pride of the devil's own rage, as to maintain that he is without sin, and not only to think himself greater than apostles, but also to charge the Saviour Himself with ignorance or folly, as if He either did not know that some men could be free from debts, or was idly teaching those whom He knew to stand in no need of the remedy of that prayer? But since all the saints who altogether keep the commands of their King, say every day "Forgive us our debts," if they speak the truth, there is indeed no one free from sin, but if they speak falsely, it is equally true that they are not free from the sin of falsehood. Wherefore also that most wise Ecclesiastes reviewing in his mind all the actions and purposes of men declares without any exception: "that there is not a righteous man upon earth, that doeth good and sinneth not," i.e., no one ever could or ever will be found on this earth so holy, so diligent, so earnest as to be able continually to cling to that true and unique good, and not day after day to feel that he is drawn aside from it and fails. But still though he maintains that he cannot be free from wrong doing, yet none the less we must not deny that he is righteous.

19

XVIIII. Quod in ipsa quoque orationis hora peccatum declinari uix possit.

Quisquis itaque anamarteton, id est inpeccantiam naturae adscribit humanae, non inanibus uerbis, sed conscientiae suae nobiscum testimonio ac probatione confligat et tunc demum se absque peccato esse pronuntiet, cum se ab hoc summo bono senserit non auulsum: immo uero quisquis considerans conscientiam suam, ut non dicam amplius, unam saltim synaxin sine ulla uerbi uel facti uel cogitationis interpellatione se deprehenderit celebrasse, absque peccato se esse pronuntiet. proinde quia his omnibus otiosis ac superfluis rebus uolucrem humanae mentis excursum fatemur carere non posse, per hoc utique consequenter sine peccato nos non esse ueraciter confitemur. nam quantauis circumspectione unusquisque cor suum seruare contendat, numquam id secundum desiderium spiritus sui repugnante carnis condicione custodiet. quanto enim magis profecerit mens humana et ad sinceriorem contemplationis peruenerit puritatem, tanto se inmundiorem quasi per speculum suae puritatis inspiciet, quia necesse est ut, dum animus ad sublimiorem se extendit intuitum et maiora quam agit prospiciens concupiscit, illa in quibus est ut inferiora semper ac uiliora despiciat. plura siquidem denotat sincerior obtutus paritque sibi maiorem reprehensionis dolorem inreprehensibilis uita et multiplicat gemitus atque suspiria emendatio morum et aemulatio adtenta uirtutum. nemo enim illo in quo profecerit gradu potest esse contentus et quantum quis fuerit mente purgatior, tanto se sordidiorem uidens magis humilitatis quam elationis inuenit causas, quantoque pernicius ad sublimiora conscenderit, tanto amplius praeuidet sibi superesse quo tendat. denique ille apostolorum eximius, quem diligebat Iesus, recumbens supra pectus eius, hanc quasi ex dominico protulit corde sententiam: si dixerimus quia peccatum non habemus, ipsi nos seducimus et ueritas in nobis non est. itaque si dicentes nos non habere peccatum ueritatem, id est Christum non habemus in nobis, quid aliud proficimus, nisi ut nos hac ipsa professione ex peccatoribus sceleratos atque impios adprobemus.

CHAPTER XIX. How even in the hour of prayer it is almost impossible to avoid sin.

Whoever then ascribes sinlessness to human nature must fight against no idle words but the witness and proof of his conscience which is on our side, and then only should maintain that he is without sin, when he finds that he is not torn away from this highest good: nay rather, whoever considering his own conscience, to say no more, finds that he has celebrated even one single service without the distraction of a single word or deed or thought, may say that he is without sin. Further because we admit that the discursive lightness of the human mind cannot get rid of these idle and empty things, we thus consequently confess with truth that we are not without sin. For with whatever care a man tries to keep his heart, he can never, owing to the resistance of the nature of the flesh, keep it according to the desire of his spirit. For however far the human mind may have advanced and progressed towards a finer purity of contemplation, so much the more will it see itself to be unclean, as it were in the mirror of its purity, because while the soul raises itself for a loftier vision and as it looks forth yearns for greater things than it performs, it is sure always to despise as inferior and worthless the things in which it is mixed up. Since a keener sight notices more; and a blameless life produces greater sorrow when found fault with; and amendment of life, and earnest striving after goodness multiplies groans and sighs. For no one can rest content with that stage to which he has advanced, and however much a man may be purified in mind, so much the more does he see himself to be foul, and find grounds for humiliation rather than for pride, and, however swiftly he may climb to greater heights, so much more does he see above him whither he is tending. Finally that chosen Apostle "whom Jesus loved," who lay on His bosom, uttered this saying as if from the heart of the Lord: "If we say that we have no sin we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." And so if when we say that we have no sin, we have not the truth, that is Christ, in us, what good do we do except to prove ourselves by this very profession, criminals and wicked among sinners?

20

XX. A quibus sit peccati euacuatio et uirtutum discenda perfectio.

Postremo si cordi est uerius explorare, utrum possibile sit humanae substantiae anamarteton possidere, a quibus hoc manifestius discere poterimus quam ab his qui carnem suam crucifixerunt cum uitiis et concupiscentiis, et quibus uere crucifixus est mundus? qui cum de cordibus suis non solum radicitus uitia uniuersa conuulserint, uerum etiam cogitationes ac memoriam peccatorum conentur excludere, nihilominus tamen cotidie fideliter profitentur ne una quidem hora macula se posse carere peccati.

CHAPTER XX. From whom we can learn the destruction of sin and perfection of goodness.

Lastly if you would like to investigate more thoroughly whether it is possible for human nature to attain sinlessness, from whom can we more clearly learn this than from those who "have crucified the flesh with its faults and lusts," and to whom "the world is really crucified"? Who though they have not only utterly eradicated all faults from their hearts, but also are trying to shut out even the thought and recollection of sin, yet still day after day faithfully maintain that they cannot even for a single hour be free from spot of sin.

21

XXI. Quod licet agnoscamus nos sine peccato non esse, non debeamus tamen nosmet ipsos a dominica conmunione suspendere.

Nec tamen ex eo debemus nos a dominica communione suspendere, quia nos agnoscimus peccatores, sed ad eam magis ac magis est propter animae medicinam ac purificationem spiritus auide festinandum, uerumtamen ea humilitate mentis ac fide, ut indignos nos perceptione tantae gratiae iudicantes remedia potius nostris uulneribus expetamus. alioquin nec anniuersaria quidem digne est praesumenda communio, ut quidam faciunt, qui in monasteriis consistentes ita sacramentorum caelestium dignitatem et sanctificationem ac meritum metiuntur, ut aestiment ea non nisi sanctos atque inmaculatos debere praesumere, et non potius ut sanctos mundosque nos sua participatione perficiant. qui profecto maiorem arrogantiae praesumptionem, quam declinare sibi uidentur, incurrunt, quia uel tunc cum ea percipiunt dignos se esse perceptione diiudicant. multo autem iustius est ut cum hac cordis humilitate, qua credimus et fatemur illa sacrosancta mysteria numquam pro merito nos posse contingere, singulis ea dominicis ob remedium nostrarum aegritudinum praesumamus, quam ut uana persuasione cordis elati uel post annum dignos eorum participio nos esse credamus. quapropter ut haec intellegere et fructuose tenere possimus, misericordiam domini, ut nos ad perficienda haec adiuuet, adtentius inploremus, quae nequaquam ita ut ceterae humanae artes praecedente quadam ratione uerborum, sed actu potius et experientia praeeunte discuntur, quaeque rursum nisi tam conlationibus spiritalium uirorum frequenter examinata fuerint et polita quam documentis et cotidiana experientia sollicite uentilata, aut obsolescunt incuria aut otiosa obliuione depereunt.

CHAPTER XXI. That although we acknowledge that we cannot be without sin, yet still we ought not to suspend ourselves from the Lord's Communion.

Yet we ought not to suspend ourselves from the Lord's Communion because we confess ourselves sinners, but should more and more eagerly hasten to it for the healing of our soul, and purifying of our spirit, and seek the rather a remedy for our wounds with humility of mind and faith, as considering ourselves unworthy to receive so great grace. Otherwise we cannot worthily receive the Communion even once a year, as some do, who live in monasteries and so regard the dignity and holiness and value of the heavenly sacraments, as to think that none but saints and spotless persons should venture to receive them, and not rather that they would make us saints and pure by taking them. And these thereby fall into greater presumption and arrogance than what they seem to themselves to avoid, because at the time when they do receive them, they consider that they are worthy to receive them. But it is much better to receive them every Sunday for the healing of our infirmities, with that humility of heart, whereby we believe and confess that we can never touch those holy mysteries worthily, than to be puffed up by a foolish persuasion of heart, and believe that at the year's end we are worthy to receive them. Wherefore that we may be able to grasp this and hold it fruitfully, let us the more earnestly implore the Lord's mercy to help us to perform this, which is learnt not like other human arts, by some previous verbal explanation, but rather by experience and action leading the way; and which also unless it is often considered and hammered out in the Conferences of spiritual persons, and anxiously sifted by daily experience and trial of it, will either become obsolete through carelessness or perish by idle forgetfulness.

Latin text: Conlationes XXIIII, ed. M. Petschenig, Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 13, Vienna, 1886, checked against the scans; without the critical apparatus. · English translation by E. C. S. Gibson († 1924), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2nd series, vol. 11, New York, 1894. Gibson left Conferences XII and XXII untranslated. Public-domain text in France (art. L123-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code). Transcription and revision: Abbatia Sancti Petri de Curte. Report an error